Banks Declare War on Crypto: Will the OCC Cave to the ABA’s Whims?

by

A Tale of Two Worlds: The Great Crypto-Banking Schism

  • The American Bankers Association, in a fit of bureaucratic piety, beseeches the OCC to halt its crypto trust bank approvals.
  • Banks, clutching their ledgers like sacred relics, cry “Regulatory uncertainty!” and “Financial stability risks!”
  • The OCC’s recent approvals for crypto titans like Ripple and BitGo have sent traditional banks into a tailspin of envy and dread.
  • Crypto firms, with a wink and a nod, label the ABA’s efforts as protectionist-a desperate bid to guard their crumbling fiefdoms.

In a missive dated February 11, the ABA, with all the gravitas of a medieval scribe, implored the OCC to tread cautiously as the digital asset landscape metamorphoses. This plea, dripping with thinly veiled panic, underscores the growing chasm between the stodgy banks and the crypto upstarts yearning to infiltrate the federal banking sanctum.

Regulatory Woes: A Farce in Three Acts

At the heart of the ABA’s lament lies the specter of regulatory uncertainty. With the fervor of a prophet, they declare that the OCC must await the divine decree of the GENIUS Act before granting any more charters. To proceed otherwise, they warn, would sow chaos and supervisory risks-a calamity of biblical proportions.

The banking lobby, ever vigilant, also raises the alarm about safety and soundness. They scoff at crypto firms’ lack of traditional fiduciary activities, painting them as reckless adventurers prone to insolvency and cyber doom. “Granting these mavericks national trust charters without the same capital and compliance standards?” they cry. “It’s financial heresy!”

And let us not forget the branding debacle. The ABA, with a straight face, demands that crypto firms be barred from using the word “bank” in their names, lest the unwashed masses mistake them for proper financial institutions. Heaven forbid!

Fair Competition? A Comedy of Errors

Banking groups, led by the august Bank Policy Institute, wail that limited-purpose charters give crypto firms a free pass into the federal oversight club without the burdensome regulations that traditional banks endure. “It’s an uneven playing field!” they moan, clutching their pearls.

The OCC’s recent antics have only fanned the flames. In December 2025, they bestowed conditional national trust bank approvals upon crypto luminaries like Ripple, BitGo, and Paxos. And as if that weren’t enough, they clarified that national banks could dabble in “riskless” crypto transactions and hold digital assets for blockchain gas fees. The ABA’s response? A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in January 2026, which prompted the ABA’s latest tirade.

Crypto Strikes Back: A Satire in Progress

The crypto sector, ever the provocateur, has fired back with gusto. The Blockchain Association dismisses the ABA’s efforts as protectionist drivel, accusing traditional banks of clinging to their financial thrones while innovation marches on. For crypto firms, national trust charters are the golden ticket to legitimacy and federal oversight-a pathway to regulated digital asset services. For banks, they’re a harbinger of doom.

As federal agencies continue their Sisyphean task of shaping stablecoin and digital asset rules, the outcome of this clash will determine crypto’s place in the US banking system. Will the banks retain their grip on the financial reins, or will the crypto upstarts usurp their throne? Only time-and the OCC-will tell.

Disclaimer: This article is a satirical reinterpretation and should not be taken as financial, investment, or trading advice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Read More

2026-02-12 15:42