Movies

The Shocking True Story Behind Good American Family’s Heartbreaking Finale You Can’t Miss

BBG News

Katie Robbins, writer and producer of Hulu’s Good American Family, understands how tales can sometimes be deceptive. The series is based on the true account of the Barnett family adopting Natalia Grace, a child with dwarfism, in 2010. However, their family life took a dark turn as they came to believe that Natalia was an adult trying to swindle them, only ending their relationship after this conviction.

The tale is stranger than any work of imagination. As Robbins delved into the lives of the individuals in this narrative, she found that each account she encountered presented a vastly different perspective. Her personal views kept shifting, making it incredibly challenging to discern the true facts behind the story.

Robbins decided to narrate ‘Good American Family’ from various viewpoints, initially focusing on Kristine and Michael Barnett (portrayed by Ellen Pompeo and Mark Duplass) during the initial episodes. However, as the series progressed, it moved to Natalia Grace (played by Imogen Faith Reid). The final episode, airing on Hulu this Wednesday, compiles all these viewpoints, as the Barnetts find themselves facing neglect charges, leading to a heated courtroom showdown.

In this piece, Robbins examines the key disclosures from the finale of “The Good American Family“, such as an important flaw that significantly altered the course of Natalia’s situation.

Making a show that makes you question everything

The concept for producing “Good American Family” resurfaced in 2020, which was two years prior to the actual trial. However, due to COVID-related delays, the scriptwriting didn’t begin until after the court proceedings had ended. As Robbins explains, by that time, we had a wealth of information at our disposal, including depositions, court documents, Facebook messages, and medical records – an abundance that was both amazing and overwhelming. She likened it to a sculptor working with a massive block of stone: “You have to chip away at it to reveal the story you’re trying to tell hidden within.

In my opinion, one of the most impactful aspects of the show “Good American Family” lies in the shift from the Barnett family’s perspective to that of Natalia. This change has been instrumental in giving us, as viewers, an opportunity to challenge our own prejudices and question why we accept certain narratives. It wasn’t until later that many of us came to understand that Natalia was simply an innocent child, not a villain bent on destroying the Barnett family.

In simpler terms, Robbins mentions that people often ask themselves questions like, “Why did I believe them? Why did I trust what I saw? Why didn’t I ask more questions?” This is a crucial habit we should all practice in our daily lives – approaching the world with a sense of curiosity and compassion. Remarkably, this seems to be a trend that’s emerging with this show, according to Robbins.

What happens in the finale?

In the final episode of “Good American Family,” I found myself huddled with my lawyers, gathering evidence for our impending trial where we’re accused of neglecting a dependent and conspiring to do so. The pieces seemed to be falling into place, but one crucial element was missing: character witnesses. As we delved deeper, I began to question the allegiance of those I once considered allies – the school principal, Natalia’s first adoptive mother, even our doctors. Their perspectives on our situation were starkly different from ours. The editing of that scene felt like a tense cross-examination in court, leaving me feeling as if my confidence was being tested to its limits.

In a surprising turn of events, Kristine’s closest confidante and supporter, Val (Sarayu Blue), begins to question her loyalty towards Kristine. Kristine had been a pillar of support for Val’s daughter, and Val had provided emotional and financial aid to Kristine in return. However, when Kristine asks Val to vouch for Natalia’s character in court, Val finds herself in a quandary. She hadn’t personally witnessed any of the terrible incidents that Kristine claimed. As Robbins puts it, “When a friend confides in you, you trust them without question.

On the opposite side of the legal battle, Natalia’s legal team has unearthed a significant finding: distressing Facebook conversations between Kristine and Michael concerning Natalia. In these messages, they make derogatory comments about her, referring to her as a “thing” and a “hungover hooker who had been smoking something.” The sheer volume of these messages adds to the emotional impact. A gradual camera pull-back unveils a substantial table laden with what appears to be an endless supply of paper stacks, each filled with messages. Robbins, a team member, confirms that all the messages are authentic and that the towering piles truly reflect the magnitude of the messages exchanged. “There’s no exaggeration here,” Robbins explains. “The dialogue presented in the show is merely the tip of the iceberg.

Natalia, understandably saddened as she reads the messages, manages to hold herself together. It appears that years of mistreatment have made her resilient. Robbins notes a certain world-weariness in Natalia, despite her youth. She’s carried the weight of society’s prejudice against disabled individuals for her entire life. However, glimpses of vulnerability can be seen: “It’s how many people speak about people like me,” Natalia shares with Detective Drysdale.

In the last episode, the most stunning twist of the series is unveiled. Prior to the trial, the Barnetts’ lawyer employs a clever legal tactic that prevents any mention of Natalia’s true age during the court proceedings. This seemingly straightforward case for Natalia has now turned into an insurmountable challenge. With this rule in place, how can they prove she was abused as a child when no evidence of her childhood is admissible?

In the end, what truly counted in the courtroom wasn’t as crucial as I expected, given how compellingly the Barnetts had narrated their story prior. This fact left me utterly astonished, and it was genuinely terrifying for me.

This situation results in a scene filled with growing agitation, as multiple onlookers are continually silenced when they attempt to bring up Natalia’s age as relevant information. A medical professional even exclaims in exasperation, “Is it that we don’t care about the truth here?

As stated by Robbins, a significant number of these instances are directly taken from medical records like transcripts and depositions. The doctors expressed their frustration by asking questions such as, “What is expected of me to do my job effectively? Aren’t we concerned about uncovering the truth?

In essence, Robbins argues that facts backed by evidence should hold weight, but they often don’t within a justice system designed for safety and rights protection. He finds this disconnect to be deeply troubling, as it’s one of the most disturbing aspects portrayed in the series.

In the series, Natalia finds herself in a tough spot where she’s forced to falsely claim her birth year as 1989 instead of her actual birthdate in 2003 under oath. As the lawyer presses for her true birth year, the show shifts between her sad expression and a sequence recounting her journey with the Barnetts – from their initial adoption to their subsequent abandonment. At this juncture, Natalia realizes she’s lost the case. However, what hurts even more is the feeling that her identity has been stolen and any hope for justice after the hardships she endured at the hands of the Barnetts seems unattainable.

How Good American Family ends

In time, Natalia goes to see Michael in the hope of finding out why he allowed the mistreatment to occur. Michael offers an explanation that “those who inflict pain are often hurt themselves,” and attempts to rationalize his actions, but never expresses remorse. The only one to offer an apology is Jacob, Michael and Kristine’s eldest son (played by Aaron Potter): “You made us fear you, but you were just a child. I shouldn’t have obeyed. I am truly sorry.” It should be noted that Jacob himself was also young at the time.

In simpler terms, Robbins explains that Michael often refuses to acknowledge significant aspects of the show, but occasionally glimpses what these revelations might imply about himself, which he finds frightening. Consequently, he can’t sustain this state for long periods and only experiences these moments briefly. Meanwhile, Jacob’s apology provides Natalia with hope amidst their difficult situation.

In the show titled “Good American Family,” there’s an exploration of inherited emotional wounds. We catch glimpses into Kristine and Michael’s past, hinting at difficult childhoods they may have experienced. As Jacob and Natalia share a brief moment of kindness, director Robbins muses that this moment might be a sign of hope for breaking the cycle of their troubled past.

In the last installment of “Good American Family”, it’s quite an emotional ride, yet it concludes on a positive note. Natalia comes back home, feeling downcast, but her newly adopted siblings display to her the encouraging messages people are posting online. This catches Natalia off guard and leaves her in a state of surprise and overwhlem. A warm smile spreads across her face, and she lets out a sigh of relief. Although she didn’t prevail in court, she has triumphed in the court of public opinion.

In Robbins’ view, the ending serves as a culmination for Natalia. He explains, “The narrative begins with the portrayal of Natalia as a monster by Kristine and Michael, and it’s fascinating to see how this initial depiction sets off an extensive character journey that ultimately impacts her in court.

From now on, I’m dreading that people will always view me as the villain and a fraud, like the Barnetts portray me to be. To my adoptive mother, Cynthia Mans, I lamented, ‘I’ll spend the rest of my days being seen as a monster at 33 years old.’

Robbins states, “That’s not reality,” and throughout the book “Good American Family“, Natalia yearned for recognition and affection. She endured more mistreatment than many could fathom. However, in the end, she’s asserting her strength, accepting the love she had long sought. Although she may not secure legal retribution, she understands that people truly comprehend her, despite the Barnett family’s attempts to portray her as a villain.

 All you can do is hope that’s enough.

Read More

2025-04-30 23:07

Previous post ‘We Had Resources for Sure’: Thunderbolts* Director Reveals Explicit Instructions from Kevin Feige
Next post Raw