Will VIRTUAL Flip $2? 🤔 Whale Wars & Retail Armageddon Await!

by

a short squeeze could erupt if buying pressure persists. 🎪

Speculative flows have surged, fueled by AI-agent hype, metaverse buzz, and abnormal whale-sized wallet activity. The market’s pricing momentum like a caffeinated squirrel-upward bursts possible, but one wrong turn and it’s back to the nut bin. 🐿️

Table of Contents

Virtuals Protocol price scenario

On October 28, 2025, VIRTUAL consolidates around $1.50-$1.55, with short-term traders bouncing between $1.38 and $1.68 like kangaroos on a pogo stick. Resistance clusters at $1.90-$2.00, while 24-hour volume surges suggest AI-themed crypto is the new black. 🦘

More tokens vanish into whale wallets, hinting at liquidity hoarding. This is standard pre-run-up behavior-liquidity gets pulled from the order book like a magician’s rabbit. Meanwhile, retail investors are buying in, presumably because they’ve run out of better ideas. 🎩🐇

Upside outlook for VIRTUAL price

If whales keep buying and retails join the party, VIRTUAL might break above $1.90-$2.00 like a dam bursting. Algo bots and FOMO-driven traders could then send prices to $2.30-$2.50. 🚀

VIRTUAL’s metaverse-AI narrative is a gold-plated story, but stories are flimsy things. Still, SDK expansions and developer chatter might keep the hype train rolling. Just don’t forget to wear a seatbelt. 🚂

Downside risks to Virtuals Protocol

The same speculative fire that fuels upside could backfire. If VIRTUAL falters below $2, profits will flee like a startled gazelle, dragging prices to $1.30-$1.40. Without real on-chain action or developer love, this could all collapse faster than a house of cards in a hurricane. 🏠🌪️

Virtuals Protocol price prediction based on current levels

To reach $2.30-$2.50, whales must keep stacking, volumes must roar, and $1.90-$2.00 must fall like a rotten apple. If not? Expect a slide to $1.30-$1.40. Traders should track volume-weighted closes and short-interest data-because if you don’t know what you’re doing, you’re probably doing it wrong. 🍎📉

Read More

2025-10-29 16:22