Senator Lummis Says US Bitcoin Reserve Funding Can Begin ‘Anytime’

by

Senator Cynthia Lummis, in her ever-dramatic flair, proclaimed that funding for a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve “can start anytime.”

Her timely (and rather impulsive) remark has undoubtedly stoked the fiery debate in Washington about how quickly the Treasury can start making moves, even before Congress manages to iron out the finer details in legislation. Who needs a plan when you’ve got a tweet, right?

Senator’s Remark Ignites Push for a Strategic Crypto Stockpile

While a few draft bills are still languishing in the review stages in Congress, Lummis’ comments suggest that the Treasury Department might already have the political green light to get cracking-maybe even set up infrastructure or make allocations. Who needs formal legislation when you’ve got the will to make things happen?

“Legislating is a slog and we continue to work toward passage. But, thanks to President Trump, the acquisition of funds for an SBR can start anytime,” Lummis posted on X. A tweet. Nothing screams “official” quite like that.

Thanks to President Trump’s executive order from March, the Treasury now manages roughly 200,000 BTC-valued at an impressive $17 billion as of mid-March-laid out as the bedrock for this mysterious reserve. White House adviser David Sacks, with a straight face, assures us that the program is “budget-neutral,” using seized assets rather than taxpayer funds. Because who doesn’t love a good seized asset?

This order also established two sparkling new accounts: the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, which holds BTC that’s too precious to ever be sold (just to admire), and the Digital Asset Stockpile for other seized tokens. Both have been neatly packed under the Treasury’s watchful eye, with zero-cost upkeep. Sounds like a steal, right?

Trump, ever the visionary, called Bitcoin “a fantastic new ledger-based asset” that empowers people globally. He framed the policy as a brilliant way to reduce debt and solidify US financial dominance. Ah, the good ol’ days of “making America financially great again” with crypto.

The House’s 2026 appropriations bill, H.R. 5166, directs the Treasury to conduct a 90-day study on issues like custody, cybersecurity, and accounting for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. It also throws in a classified NSA briefing, boosts the budget for the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence to explore AI sanctions, and slaps a ban on Treasury from using funds to design a central bank digital currency. Because why not cover all the bases?

Although this bill doesn’t authorize new purchases of Bitcoin (yet!), it marks the first time that Bitcoin has found itself at the center of a fiscal policy discussion. A small step for Bitcoin, a giant leap for fiscal policy?

Economic Models and Market Outlook

Vitallaw, in its infinite wisdom, points out that this executive order designates the Treasury as a “digital Fort Knox,” consolidating all forfeited BTC under federal custody with rigorous key management and multi-signature security. Because, after all, why leave your digital gold unguarded?

Asset manager VanEck, clearly having a lot of time on their hands, modeled that acquiring one million BTC by 2029 could offset 18% of the US debt by 2049. All this, based on a nifty 25% annual growth. Nothing like some good old-fashioned optimism.

Lummis, not to be outdone, argues that such a reserve would bolster America’s position as a “financial and technological superpower.” Well, we can’t deny it: she has a way with words. 👑

BeInCrypto’s analysis predicts that if Congress passes the reserve law without forcing mandatory purchases, Bitcoin could hover around $115,000-$125,000. However, with a mandate to purchase 200,000 BTC annually? Oh, prices could surge to $130,000-$160,000. Because, really, what’s Bitcoin without some dramatic price jumps? 🚀

CoinShares, ever the optimist, argues that a sovereign Bitcoin allocation could serve as a hedge against inflation, diversify reserves, and, of course, signal technological supremacy. They pointed to early state-level projects like New Hampshire’s HB 302 and Arizona’s “crypto reserve” as proof that the idea is catching on. 🏆

However, not everyone is on board. Chainalysis raised a cautionary eyebrow, warning that mass sovereign Bitcoin acquisitions could strain liquidity if multiple nations start stockpiling at once. Economist David Krause, ever the skeptic, labeled the reserve as a “high-risk experiment in financial symbolism,” warning that it could blur the line between fiscal responsibility and speculative madness. But hey, what’s the point of being cautious when you’ve got the power of crypto behind you?

For now, it seems that a single senator’s tweet has turned what was once a theoretical fiscal idea into a full-blown political circus. The burning question is whether Washington can manage a digital reserve without destabilizing the very market it aspires to lead. 🍿

Read More

2025-10-07 17:48