Quantum Computers vs. Bitcoin: The Sky Is Falling… Or Is It?

by

PsiQuantum, a company that seems to have mistaken itself for a Bond villain, has announced it’s building what it calls the “first utility-scale quantum computer” in the United States. Because, you know, what the world really needs is another thing to worry about.

This news has sent the crypto crowd into a tizzy, with some folks claiming Bitcoin is doomed and others insisting it’s all just a bunch of hooey. Honestly, it’s like watching a debate about whether the Earth is flat, but with more math.

PsiQuantum’s Chicago Quantum Facility: Bitcoin’s New Boogeyman?

In a recent post on X (formerly known as Twitter, because why not add more confusion to the world?), PsiQuantum’s co-founder, Pete Shadbolt, boasted about raising 500 tons of steel in six days at the Illinois Quantum and Microelectronics Park (IQMP). Apparently, this is where they plan to build a million-qubit quantum computer. Because, clearly, we haven’t already got enough problems with regular computers.

“Time to build really big quantum computers,” Shadbolt said, presumably while stroking a white cat.

Follow us on X for more updates on how the world is ending, one qubit at a time.

Current quantum computers are extremely impressive but we’ve known for decades that much bigger, faster, more capable systems will be needed to solve truly valuable problems. This site unlocks orders of magnitude of scaling – and is just the first step in our long-term plan to take over the world.

– Pete Shadbolt (@PeteShadbolt) March 5, 2026

Back in September 2025, PsiQuantum raised a cool $1 billion in funding. Because, let’s face it, building a quantum computer isn’t cheap. Unless you’re stealing it from a spy movie.

They’re also teaming up with NVIDIA, because apparently, quantum computing isn’t complicated enough without adding GPUs to the mix.

But PsiQuantum isn’t alone in this quantum arms race. IBM is working on its own quantum computer, Starling, which they claim will be 20,000 times more powerful than current models. Because, you know, why stop at 1,000 qubits when you can have millions?

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch experts explain why we should all be panicking… or not.

Is Bitcoin’s Future in Jeopardy? Or Are We Just Being Dramatic?

The crypto community is, as usual, divided. Michael Saylor, the Executive Chairman of Strategy, thinks the quantum threat is overblown. Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, agrees. And Cory Klippsten, CEO of Swan, calls it “FUD”-fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Because nothing says “I’m not worried” like dismissing concerns as “lazy and wrong.”

“A quantum attacker needs your public key to even start. If you never reuse addresses, your public keys stay hidden, as secret as your private keys. Your Bitcoin at rest is safe,” Klippsten said. “And the hardware needed to crack a Bitcoin key in a day? 13 million physical qubits. Best machines today have about 1,000. We’re four orders of magnitude away from the threat these people are fear-mongering about.”

Of course, there are those who think the threat is imminent. David Carvalho, CEO of Naoris Protocol, warns that quantum computers could break secure algorithms in just 2 to 3 years. The Quantum Doomsday Clock, meanwhile, has us all doomed by March 8, 2028. Because nothing says “relax” like a countdown to apocalypse.

PsiQuantum’s co-founder Terry Rudolph has tried to reassure everyone that they’re not planning to use their quantum computers to steal Bitcoin. But let’s be honest, no one’s really convinced.

Weird I was told quantum computers were theoretical and not ready for prime time.

– nic carter (@nic_carter) March 5, 2026

In the end, PsiQuantum’s progress has added a bit of reality to a debate that’s been mostly theoretical. Whether the threat is real or not, one thing’s for sure: the crypto world loves a good drama. So grab your popcorn, folks. This is going to be entertaining.

Read More

2026-03-06 10:01