Vitalik Buterin, one of the creators of Ethereum, has been speaking about how quickly Artificial Intelligence (AI) is developing. He believes AI is consistently surpassing human abilities, even in unexpected areas.
Vitalik Buterin points out that people often try to compare humans and AI by focusing on just one thing, like how smart they are or how much they produce economically.
He argues that using this one metric for comparison isn’t helpful, because it leads people to incorrectly compare AI and human abilities.
Shiba Inu (SHIB), Solana (SOL), Hyperliquid (HYPE) and XRP Price Analysis for July 20: Fresh Week Without Fresh Liquidity
Ethereum Developer Consensys Denies User Data Was Compromised
Buterin discusses human vs AI capabilities
Vitalik Buterin recently stated that we should see both people and artificial intelligence as having diverse skills and abilities.
These abilities include both physical actions – like walking or using your hands – and mental skills such as problem-solving, understanding emotions, and quick calculations.
Vitalik Buterin pointed to the year 1500 as an example, noting that even then, machines were only better than people at a limited number of specific jobs.
He pointed to watermills and windmills, explaining that while these machines were much more efficient than people at harnessing natural power, humans excelled in nearly everything else.
Buterin says AI is expanding
As a researcher, I’ve been following Vitalik Buterin’s insights on AI, and he’s pointed out an interesting parallel to past technological leaps. He suggests that current AI systems are developing in a comparable way, but at a much faster pace and larger scale. In fact, he believes AI is already exceeding human capabilities in areas we haven’t even fully considered yet.
Buterin pointed out that AI isn’t likely to suddenly replace people. Instead, it’s slowly becoming capable of more and more things, improving bit by bit and exceeding human abilities in specific areas.
Vitalik Buterin believes we should track AI’s progress by how many things it can do *well*, instead of trying to determine if it’s generally “more intelligent” than people.
2026-07-20 19:05