Crypto Drama Unfolds: Hidden Evidence and Legal Shenanigans! 🚨

by

Crypto developers dodge legal bullets — or do they? Find out the shocking truth! 😲

In the grand theatre of jurisprudence, the attorneys for the esteemed Tornado Cash architect, Roman Storm, have, with a flourish of legal fervor, submitted a motion most daring. They beseeched the court to reconsider the prior dismissal of their client’s case, alleging that the prosecutors, in their infinite wisdom—or perhaps in their boundless zeal—failed to disclose exculpatory evidence. This evidence, a series of clandestine communications with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) dating back to the year of our Lord 2023, appears to cast a shadow of doubt upon the prosecution’s narrative. Truly, one would think such revelations might cause a moment’s hesitation, but no—facts, it seems, are mere trifles in the grand game of law and order. 📜

According to an epistle dated May 16, penned by Storm’s legal champions to the venerable Judge Katherine Polk Failla, these FinCEN documents illuminate that non-custodial cryptographic mixers are not, in the eyes of law, “money transmitting businesses.” A revelation that, if true, perhaps ought to have stayed their hand. But still, the prosecutors—either blind or stubborn—charged ahead against the developers of Samourai Wallet and Tornado Cash, as if the truth was but a mere shadow in the moonlight. The attorneys suggest, with a hint of sarcasm, that perhaps the prosecutors have known of this legal clarity since the mystical year of 2023, yet chose to ignore it like an unwelcome guest at a soirĂŠe. 😏

Crypto courtroom drama

The defenders of Storm, with a flourish, deny that any evidence was withheld, claiming the documents found their way into the court’s hands within the agreed-upon timeframe—a rather delicate ballet of legal discovery. However, their words echo those of their counterparts in the Samourai case, who, in a legal missive on May 5, accused the government of playing fast and loose with the facts, and—worse—of attempting to deceive the court with polished tales about FinCEN guidance. Indeed, if the court were a stage, one might say the government’s performance was at best a comedy of errors, at worst a trick played on the honest audience. 🎭

“The disclosures in the Samourai case reveal that the government, at the very least, played fast and loose and, at worst, affirmatively misled this Court with its arguments about FinCEN guidance when responding to the motions to dismiss and to compel discovery.”

They further argued that although the government feigns innocence and claims the cases bear only superficial resemblance, in reality they share the very DNA of cryptocurrency mixers, rendering the FinCEN documents remarkably pertinent to the matter at hand. Or so they say, with a tone that might suggest a pinch of sarcasm—because who doesn’t enjoy a good legal soap opera? 📺

Legal theatrics

Roman Storm’s trial presses on despite unlawful sanctions—what a twist! 🤔

In an episode worthy of the most dramatic of dramas, Judge Robert Pitman, in a noteworthy ruling on April 28, declared that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) could not, under any circumstances, reimpose sanctions upon Tornado Cash—a victory, some might say, for justice against the oppressive, but perhaps only for now. This decision sets a precedent—an anchor in the turbulent sea of cryptocurrency law.

Yet, in a move seemingly orchestrated for effect, the federal prosecutors brushed aside this legal victory and pressed forward with their case against Storm, albeit with charges altered, as if rewriting the script mid-performance. The drama continues, dear reader, and one can only wonder—will justice truly prevail, or is this merely a game of shadows and smoke? 🕵️‍♂️

Read More

2025-05-19 01:07