Congress Sneaks CBDC into Housing Bill – Larry David Would Have a Field Day

by

So, here’s the deal. Economist Peter St. Onge-yeah, the guy with the fancy degree-goes viral on X (formerly Twitter, because why not complicate things?) warning that Congress is pulling a classic “hide the pea under the thimble” move. Apparently, they’ve stuffed a CBDC ban into a housing bill like it’s a last-minute guest at a dinner party no one invited. And get this-80% of voters are like, “Hard pass.” But hey, who cares about the voters, right? It’s not like they’re the ones paying taxes or anything.

  • Peter St. Onge’s post got 196,000 views in three hours. Probably because everyone’s like, “Wait, what’s a CBDC again?”
  • The Senate passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act with an 89-10 vote. Because nothing says “bipartisan” like sneaking in financial policy into a housing bill.
  • House Republicans want a permanent CBDC ban. Because temporary bans are like temporary tattoos-they’re fun until you realize they’re still there.

So, Peter St. Onge-Heritage Foundation guy, big brain-drops this bombshell on X: “Congress is trying to sneak a CBDC into their must-pass housing bill.” And what’s a CBDC? Oh, just a government-controlled crypto-token that’s supposed to replace the US dollar. No biggie. Only 80% of voters are against it. But hey, who’s counting?

Congress is trying to sneak a CBDC into their must-pass housing bill.

It would replace the US dollar with a government-controlled crypto-token that 80% of voters reject.

– Peter St Onge, Ph.D. (@profstonge) March 26, 2026

The bill? Oh, it’s called the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. Sounds impressive, right? It’s basically a housing reform package with a side of financial policy. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Senator Elizabeth Warren teamed up on this one. Because nothing says “bipartisan” like two people who probably can’t agree on what to order for lunch.

Buried in there? Title X. It’s like the fine print on a contract you never read. Basically, it bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a digital dollar until 2031. Because who doesn’t love a good temporary ban? It’s not like the problem will magically disappear in nine years.

House conservatives pushed for this anti-CBDC language. Why? Because they figured it’s easier to sneak it into a housing bill than to pass a standalone crypto bill. Genius. Or sneaky. Tomato, tomahto.

The CBDC Provision Dividing Washington

Here’s the kicker: this debate is like a political salad-everyone’s tossing in their two cents. Senate says ban until 2031. House Republicans want it gone forever. And the left? They’re like, “Why is this even in a housing bill? Can we just focus on making housing affordable?” Meanwhile, Wall Street’s like, “We’ll take our cut either way.”

Wall Street commentator @WallStreetMav chimes in with a post that got 92,000 views. His take? “Republicans aren’t banning CBDCs, they’re redesigning them. Same surveillance, same control, just routed through banks so Wall Street gets its cut.” Ouch. That’s gotta sting.

And let’s not forget the CLARITY Act. Because one stalled bill isn’t enough. Coinbase pulled their support because they didn’t like the stablecoin yield provisions. Senator Cynthia Lummis says they’re “largely reached” on sticking points. April 2026 is the big month. Mark your calendars. Or don’t. I’m not your mom.

A Temporary Ban or a Political Stunt?

For CBDC opponents, this ban is less about the details and more about drawing a line in the sand before the midterms. The ban expires in 2030-right after Trump’s hypothetical second term. Coincidence? I think not. The Federal Reserve’s like, “We’re just researching, we promise.” Sure, Jan.

Will the CBDC provision survive the House-Senate conference? Who knows. House leaders are already saying they won’t accept the Senate version as is. Because nothing says “bipartisan” like renegotiating everything at the last minute.

Read More

2026-03-26 19:10