SEC vs. Ripple Showdown: Curtain Call or a Devious Plot? 🎭💸

In a legal fracas that has stretched longer than a Manchester United season, the SEC vs. Ripple showdown concluded on 7 August 2025 with a resounding “No more“. Yet, lo and behold, the crypto fiends of X began whispering in hushed tones: Is this a final bow or merely the overture? Cryptocurrencies often resemble a bumbling butler-a delightful chaos-and now it’s time to uncork the facts with the precision of a Jeeves in a Whitechapel wine cellar.

To quash the sturm und drang, Coinpedia duty-knelt to separate truth from the sort of hot air that fills a poor Aunt Matilda’s knitting. Let the Œdipal unraveling commence.

Who Made This Nonsense?

The claim, as elegant as a trapeze artist atop a haystack, surfaced on X-ahem, Tweetdeck and social media-thanks to XRP-obsessed scribes and crypto newsletters with the rigor of a toddler with crayons. The rumor mill spun tales of Ripple’s $125 million “civil penalty” and the SEC’s lazy samizdat of no appeals, leaving listeners to gawk like owls clutching a Quickie Mart coupon. But is it true? Let’s pivot to the evidence with all the drama of a pantomime horse in a thunderstorm.

Coinpedia’s Key Findings: A Masterclass in Sobriety

  • Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Is Officially Over 💡📌

The decade-long duel (or so it felt) has finally entered the history books. Coinpedia’s trawl through the legal morass revealed the court’s gavel fell on 7 August 2025, period. As for Ripple, it bid adieu to $125M-split into nice, marketable chunks for institutional sales, thanks to the court’s laser-like rejection of requests to “lighten up on the money” like a Victorian nanny with a strict tea ration.

  • SEC Case Cannot Be Reopened 🚫🔥

Lovely legal guru, Bill Morgan (esq.), chuckled at the clamor surrounding res judicata, a doctrine as sturdy as a Victorian footbridge. Once the judge says “cue the violins,” the SEC’s lawyers can’t waltz back with the same tunes. No reprise, no encore. Just… mutual sighs of relief from a court as exhausted as a tea-soaked rug. 🧴

  • XRP Is Not a Security (Unless You Count Tuesday Meetings) 🎩💼

Exemplary legal sleight-of-hand! The SEC’s quixotic attempt to vilify XRP as a security collapsed under the weight of logic (and some very niche legal footnotes). The court dissected institutional, programmatic, and other XRP sales with the grace of a performing penguin, concluding that XRP stands tall as its own sovereign entity-neither pawn nor phony. The SEC might as well try to sue moonbeams for being too bright.

Coinpedia’s Evidence Against the Theory

Claim Made by TheoryCoinpedia’s Counter-Evidence
SEC vs Ripple case fully closedYes – The lawsuit itself is closed
Ripple pays $125M fineTrue – the court kept the full amount.
XRP is a securityThe court ruled that XRP itself is not
SEC can’t relitigate XRP statusTrue-res judicata locks it in.

Conclusion

ClaimIs the SEC vs. Ripple case officially closed?
Verdict True
Fact-Check by CoinpediaAs per Coinpedia research and a review, the SEC vs Ripple lawsuit has officially ended, with no further appeals pending. As clarified by Bill Morgan, the SEC cannot reopen or relitigate the same issues, including whether XRP itself is a security.

In conclusion, dear reader, the curtain has fallen on this particular melodrama. The SEC and Ripple may now retire to their respective parlors, sip their tea, and forget the whole affair ever occurred. Or, as the weasels of X would say: “Plot twist-RIP Ripple?” 🙃🧨

SEC vs. Ripple Showdown: Curtain Call or a Devious Plot? 🎭💸

Read More

2026-01-19 13:24