China’s “Mining Crackdown” or Just Market Hysteria? 😂

by

In the manner of a Russian winter, wherein even a solitary gust of wind incites widespread dread, the crypto market has endured its fair share of unfounded panics. Indeed, the past has observed Donald Trump’s tariff declaration in October, which, like a tempest, brought about a staggering liquidation of $19 billion, casting a long shadow over Q4.

Once again, the market teeters on the edge of a similar precipice. The whispers of a renewed crusade against Bitcoin [BTC] mining in China have swiftly become the talk of the narrative, gaining credibility after BTC’s hashrate plummeted approximately 8%, as if confirming the fears of the superstitious.

Yet, for those who seek enlightenment rather than succumbing to delusions, these are plain “speculations” more fit for a fireside yarn than serious discourse.

In the annals of recent happenings, our tale gains momentum when Jack Jianping Kong, known for his eloquence on the platforms, proclaimed on X that BTC mining in Xinjiang was under scrutiny. Two days thence, he asserted that China had bid farewell to at least 400k miners. Such proclamations were declared as definitive evidence of a vast shutdown. Thus arises the question: Was the 8% hashrate dip a mere coincidence or a herald of a significant market upheaval?

Separating the Substantive from the Mere Chatter in Bitcoin’s World

Bitcoin’s hashrate, which has plummeted notably, presents a narrative more intricate than it appears at first glance.

One might ponder whether the decline originated solely from Xinjiang or if it truly reflects a comprehensive mining crackdown within China. To unravel this mystery, observe the chart below, which illustrates the intricacies of BTC’s hashrate as reported by diverse mining pools.

Curiously, it is the North American pools, such as Foundry USA, which have relinquished 200 EH/s in total. Meanwhile, China-based pools like Antpool and F2Pool observed a more modest decline of approximately 100 EH/s. Indeed, one might posit, the notion of a grandiose shutdown within China’s borders appears rather exaggerated.

By the 18th of December, most of the pools had recovered, nearly returning to their habitual levels, indicating the interruption was of a fleeting nature. Moreover, it is conceivable that some miners opted to momentarily cease operations, possibly to elude inspection.

In summation, the spectacle presented by the available data suggests a transient disturbance rather than a substantial cessation in Bitcoin mining. Once more, the crypto realm has found itself ensnared by FUD, and we are gently reminded-through what could be considered an exercise in nostalgia-that a discerning investigation into the details is paramount, lest we give in to the echoing chorus of the “market cousin.”

Final Musings

  • Bitcoin’s transient hashrate decline may have caused a stir, yet most pools swiftly returned to their customary vigor, revealing the “shutdown” was but an ephemeral shadow rather than a substantial occurrence.
  • Reports of a 100 EH/s loss, when scrutinized with a discerning eye, prove to be inflated, underscoring the necessity for meticulous data analysis prior to succumbing to the allure of market theatrics.

Read More

2025-12-20 08:11