Kalshi Takes New York to Court Over Crypto.com Chaos – Guess Who’s Winning?

by

In a thrilling tale of legal drama, Kalshi, the federally regulated prediction market that operates in Manhattan (you know, the place with the big buildings and lots of people), has filed a lawsuit against the New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC). Why? Because the NYSGC decided to throw its weight around and demanded Kalshi immediately shut down its sports-event contracts. Who knew sports could be so controversial?

This delightful little confrontation came after New York sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter on October 24, in which they warned that Kalshi’s sports markets are apparently “illegal gambling” under state law. And guess what? This could result in civil fines and criminal penalties. Yikes! 🤑

The letter was issued under New York’s racing laws (seriously, who knew New York had so many laws about racing?) and listed 20 of Kalshi’s federally self-certified contracts as unlawful. Because, apparently, who needs financial innovation when you can have a perfectly good blanket of bureaucracy?

Kalshi, not one to take legal punches lying down, argues that New York doesn’t have the authority to make such a call. Kalshi insists that its markets are under the watchful eye of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the body tasked with monitoring derivatives trading. “Who needs state law when you have federal law?” Kalshi might as well have said, while shaking a fist towards Albany. 💼

The company is now asking a federal judge to step in and block New York from enforcing its state gambling rules. Because, well, if they’re going to do business in this market, they’d rather do it with the big federal boys and not get caught in the tangled web of state-level red tape.

Why this fight matters

This isn’t just your run-of-the-mill legal spat. Oh no, this is part of the much larger tug-of-war between states and federal regulators trying to figure out who controls the fast-growing world of prediction markets. Kalshi, with its heart in the right place (and a generous dash of optimism), claims its sports contracts are actually financial hedging tools, not bets. After all, who wouldn’t want to hedge on the outcome of a game like it’s a stock market rally? 📈

New York, on the other hand, is having none of it. The state sees these contracts as unlicensed sports betting, which is totally the opposite of what Kalshi says it’s doing. In this corner, we have a complicated web of federal and state law, and in the other corner, Kalshi just wants to offer financial products, thank you very much.

Kalshi, being the strategic thinker it is, wants to keep this fight focused on federal preemption. That’s the legal fancy talk for “federal law trumps state law” – always a handy argument when you’re in a sticky situation. So instead of discussing whether these contracts are gambling (yawn), Kalshi just wants to focus on the real question: Is New York even allowed to play in this legal sandbox?

And, let’s not forget the CFTC’s “Core Principles,” which require markets to be equally accessible nationwide. Kalshi says if it blocks specific states, it’ll be violating those principles, putting them in an awkward, no-win situation. State laws are one thing, but messing with the CFTC? That’s a whole different can of worms.

Other states are watching

The drama isn’t confined to New York, of course. Other states are keeping their eyes on this case like it’s the season finale of a reality TV show. Kalshi won early protection in New Jersey and Nevada, but, of course, lost in Maryland, where a judge had the audacity to order it to stop offering sports contracts. Maryland’s still letting Kalshi operate, though, while the case continues – so, you know, there’s hope!

And in case you thought things couldn’t get juicier, a Nevada judge recently ruled against Crypto.com, saying that sports results aren’t swaps under federal law. Because of this, Nevada regulators are free to treat the contracts as gambling. Now Crypto.com must block state residents and close open positions, just in time for a thrilling deadline of November 3. Guess who’s setting up geofencing? You bet they are. 🎯

And Illinois? Well, they’re also starting to wave their regulatory fingers at operators. Looks like New York might not be the only state on the brink of turning this whole crypto-sports situation into a nationwide legal rollercoaster ride. Buckle up!

Read More

2025-10-28 14:51