Movies

Utter Nonsense

BBG News

James Gunn, once more, dismisses speculations about his forthcoming Superman movie encountering insurmountable financial barriers due to an inflated budget. In a recent conversation with GQ, the director and joint head of DC Studios debunked the rumors, particularly challenging the widespread notion that the film needs to earn $700 million merely to cover its costs.

Is there a lot at stake for this project? Yes, but not as much as some might think,” Gunn explained. “People get worked up over figures suggesting the film needs to earn $700 million or more to succeed, and it’s all just exaggerated. The situation doesn’t need to be as critical as it’s being portrayed.

As a die-hard film enthusiast, I’d like to weigh in on the buzz surrounding Superman. Contrary to some opinions, I don’t view it as the most daring project out there. Rather, it’s one of those ventures that, with careful planning and execution, could very well pay off handsomely.

Nevertheless, Gunn’s previous remarks about the Superman budget have been disputed by The Hollywood Reporter. In early June, they published an article revealing the true costs of the movie, citing state documents and industry experts who present a significantly contrasting image.

$363.8 Million Budget Filed with Ohio

As reported by THR, the team behind Superman has submitted documents to the Ohio government revealing a total production budget of approximately $363.8 million. This amount is significant enough to make them eligible for tax incentives, meaning this figure is a matter of public record rather than conjecture.

Last year when the figure initially appeared, Gunn expressed his doubts on the internet, questioning: “In what way could they possibly guess what our budget amounts to?

He did not offer an alternative figure at the time.

After that announcement, DC Studios has been said to have a net budget of around $225 million, considering tax incentives and subsidies. However, The Hollywood Reporter maintains the initial gross figure of $363.8 million, stating that this amount was directly reported from the production itself in official documents. Soon, we’ll delve deeper into how tax breaks could influence this narrative.

Marketing Costs May Add Another $200 Million

The THR probe hinted at a potential global marketing expenditure of up to $200 million for Warner Bros., pushing the film’s overall budget potentially beyond $550 million, and perhaps even surpassing $600 million when accounting for additional costs like overhead and interest.

A seasoned film funding expert explained to the publication: “It’s impossible to justify these budgets. This is because when a movie requires earnings of around $700 million to $900 million from both box office sales and additional income streams, it simply doesn’t add up.

That stands in sharp opposition to Gunn’s public assertion that the $700 million break-even claim is “baseless.”

Or:

This is a clear contradiction to Gunn’s public stance, where he called the $700 million break-even figure “nonsensical.

Could Gunn Be Right About the Superman Budget? A Closer Look at the Tax Break Defense

James Gunn’s assertion that Superman doesn’t necessarily require earning $700 million to turn a profit has sparked some surprise, but it could indeed be valid—provided we consider the numbers in a certain way.

Gunn and DC Studios have indicated a production budget estimate of approximately $225 million, which is less than the reported $363.8 million in taxes filed in Ohio. This discrepancy might be due to tax incentives at both state and local levels, which could potentially save studios like Warner Bros. up to tens of millions of dollars on eligible expenses. These savings are indeed genuine, and they do mean that Warner Bros. spends less money directly when producing the film.

Furthermore, Gunn might be factoring in supplementary income sources – such as home video sales, Max streaming, international television licensing, and merchandise – into his internal profit calculations. If Warner Bros. anticipates robust earnings from post-theatrical performances, it’s plausible that the film could become profitable without needing to earn a substantial amount solely at the box office.

Nevertheless, it’s important to note some significant conditions. Marketing expenses, estimated to be as high as $200 million, do not qualify for tax breaks and significantly increase the overall expenditure. Added to the reduced net budget, the studio’s total spend could still surpass $425 million. Moreover, Warner Bros. doesn’t retain all ticket sales revenues; they usually get about 45-50% of the global box office earnings. This implies that a film with a total cost of $425 million would need to gross more than $800 million just to cover its theatrical expenses.

While Gunn’s technical analysis in a broader financial sense might hold merit, labeling a $700 million break-even point as “nonsense” overlooks essential factors that financial experts and industry professionals consider when evaluating risk. In essence, both perspectives could be pieces of the same puzzle—yet it’s only Gunn who seems to be presenting the entire picture.

DC’s Track Record and Industry Pressure

The intense examination of Superman is happening during a challenging period for comic book movie productions. Previous DC films by Warner Bros., such as “Shazam! Fury of the Gods” and “The Flash,” have been significant financial letdowns at the box office. Meanwhile, Marvel’s “Captain America: Brave New World” faltered earlier this year, and even the more favorably received “Thunderbolts” didn’t manage to make a profit.

In this current environment, initiating a new cinematic universe involves genuine financial risk. Gunn’s Superman, however, is not just another film; it serves as the foundation for a revamped DC Universe. Films such as Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, a fresh Batman interpretation, and innovative reimaginings of classic characters are already in development, building upon this initial project.

Gunn’s History of Denials

As a devoted movie enthusiast, I can’t help but address the fact that this isn’t my first dance with social media debunking reports about Superman, especially since I frequently use Threads for such matters. On numerous occasions, I’ve refuted speculations regarding the film’s tone, length, and test screenings. In some instances, I’ve even poked fun at the reporting outlets or subtly suggested they might be spreading inaccuracies.

This particular Superman budget report originated not from unverified sources like anonymous tipsters or internet commentators, but rather from The Hollywood Reporter, a reputable industry magazine that relies on official documents and insights from industry professionals.

Facing an increasingly tricky predicament, Gunn must either persist in refuting the alleged numbers or concede that the movie might be carrying a heavier financial weight than he’s currently admitting.

Read More

2025-07-07 18:58

Previous post Watch now: The “best documentary” about Oasis is now streaming for free in the UK
Next post Ozzy Osbourne and Black Sabbath farewell ending not what it seemed (this is why)