Uncovering Hidden Relationships in Complex Data

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new visualization technique reveals nonlinear connections and feature importance, offering a clearer path to understanding multifaceted datasets.

This paper introduces KAN-Matrices-Pairwise and Multivariate-as novel tools for interpreting complex data by visualizing nonlinear associations and improving feature selection.

Despite advances in data science, interpreting complex, high-dimensional datasets remains a persistent challenge, particularly when linear methods fail to capture underlying relationships. This paper introduces the ‘KAN-Matrix: Visualizing Nonlinear Pairwise and Multivariate Contributions for Physical Insight’ and presents novel visualization tools – Pairwise and Multivariate KAN Matrices – designed to reveal nonlinear associations and quantify feature contributions with improved interpretability. By moving beyond traditional correlation analyses, these matrices offer robust insights for both pre-processing tasks like feature selection and post-hoc model explanation. Can these techniques unlock hidden physical patterns and ultimately accelerate domain-informed model development across diverse scientific fields?

The Limits of Linearity: Why Traditional Analysis Often Falls Short

Many conventional statistical analyses, such as Pearson correlation – a mainstay for quantifying relationships between variables – operate under the assumption of linearity. This means they effectively measure how well data points cluster around a straight line. However, the natural world rarely adheres to such simplistic patterns; relationships are often curvilinear, exponential, or involve more intricate dependencies. Consequently, applying linear methods to non-linear data can significantly underestimate the true strength of association, or even fail to detect a relationship altogether. For instance, a U-shaped relationship between two variables might yield a near-zero Pearson correlation, despite a strong, predictable connection. This limitation is particularly problematic in fields like ecology, economics, and neuroscience, where complex, non-linear dynamics are commonplace, potentially leading to flawed interpretations and inaccurate predictive models.

Traditional statistical analyses frequently falter when confronted with datasets boasting numerous variables – a condition known as high dimensionality – and the frequent interrelation between those variables, termed collinearity. When variables are highly correlated, methods like Pearson correlation can produce misleadingly low values, masking the true strength of individual relationships because the shared variance is not properly accounted for. This occurs because these techniques attempt to isolate the unique contribution of each variable, an increasingly difficult task as the number of correlated predictors increases. Consequently, the apparent significance of certain variables may be underestimated, and the overall predictive power of a model built upon such analyses may be substantially reduced, hindering accurate interpretation and potentially leading to flawed conclusions about the underlying data.

The reliance on traditional analytical techniques presents a significant obstacle to effectively interpreting and utilizing complex datasets. When predictive models are built upon assumptions of linearity or are hampered by issues like collinearity, their accuracy and generalizability are compromised, leading to unreliable forecasts and flawed conclusions. This is particularly critical in fields dealing with high-dimensional data – such as genomics or financial modeling – where numerous interacting variables obscure simple relationships. Consequently, researchers may overlook crucial insights, misinterpret patterns, or develop models that fail to perform adequately when applied to new, unseen data, ultimately hindering progress and informed decision-making. A shift toward more nuanced analytical approaches is therefore essential to unlock the full potential of these complex information sources.

Mapping Complexity: Introducing the KAN Matrix

The KAN Matrix is a visualization tool leveraging the mathematical framework of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) to represent complex relationships between variables. Unlike traditional methods focused on linear correlations, the KAN Matrix can depict both pairwise associations – the relationship between two variables – and multivariate associations, which capture interactions among three or more variables. KANs achieve this by decomposing a function representing the association into a series of univariate transformations, effectively mapping high-dimensional relationships onto a lower-dimensional space for visualization. This decomposition allows for the identification of functional dependencies beyond simple linear or monotonic relationships, offering a more complete characterization of the association structure within a dataset. The resulting matrix representation visually displays these decomposed functions, enabling users to identify and interpret complex interactions.

The KAN Matrix utilizes a decomposition strategy that breaks down high-dimensional functions into a series of univariate transformations. This process allows the identification of nonlinear relationships because traditional association mapping techniques, such as Pearson correlation, primarily detect linear dependencies. By representing complex interactions as combinations of simpler, one-dimensional functions, the KAN Matrix can characterize associations that would otherwise be obscured or misinterpreted. This is achieved through the application of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks, which effectively map multivariate relationships onto a univariate space for analysis, revealing functional forms beyond linear models and providing a more complete picture of variable interdependence.

The KAN Matrix facilitates improved modeling accuracy by characterizing not only the strength of associations between variables – quantified as the degree of dependency – but also their functional form. Traditional association metrics, such as linear correlation coefficients, often fail to capture nonlinear relationships; the KAN Matrix, through its decomposition of complex functions, identifies and represents these nonlinearities. This detailed characterization allows for the selection of more appropriate model structures and parameterizations, leading to reduced bias and improved predictive performance compared to models based solely on linear assumptions. Specifically, understanding the functional form enables the application of transformations or the incorporation of nonlinear terms, resulting in a more faithful representation of the underlying data generating process and, consequently, more accurate predictions.

Beyond Pairwise Associations: Unveiling Multivariate Relationships

The Multivariate KAN Matrix represents an extension of the standard KAN Matrix by facilitating the analysis of relationships between more than one independent variable and a single target variable. While the core KAN Matrix assesses the influence of a single input on an output, the multivariate variant allows for the simultaneous consideration of multiple inputs, capturing potential interactions and dependencies between them. This is achieved through a matrix construction where rows represent input variable combinations and columns represent the target variable, allowing quantification of association strengths across multiple dimensions. The resulting matrix provides a comprehensive view of how various input factors, considered jointly, contribute to the variance observed in the target variable.

The capacity to model multifaceted and nonlinear interactions is crucial when analyzing complex systems due to the limitations of traditional linear methods. Many real-world systems exhibit relationships where the effect of one input variable on an output is dependent on the values of other input variables – a phenomenon captured by interaction effects. Furthermore, responses are often not proportional to changes in inputs, necessitating nonlinear modeling techniques. The Multivariate KAN Matrix addresses these challenges by providing a framework to characterize these interactions, enabling the identification of combined effects and deviations from linearity that might otherwise remain obscured. This is particularly relevant in fields where relationships are rarely simple and where understanding these complexities is essential for accurate prediction and control.

Application of the Multivariate KAN Matrix to the CAMELS (Catchment Attributes for Large-scale Hydrological Modeling) dataset has proven effective in identifying significant relationships between various watershed characteristics and hydrological responses. Analysis utilizing this matrix revealed previously unquantified associations between attributes such as soil type, land cover, and topographic features with key hydrological variables including streamflow, evapotranspiration, and water storage. Specifically, the Multivariate KAN Matrix successfully highlighted nonlinear interactions and complex dependencies that are often obscured by traditional linear correlation methods, enabling a more nuanced understanding of watershed behavior and improved hydrological model calibration and prediction accuracy. The dataset, comprising attributes from over 700 watersheds across the contiguous United States, provided sufficient data to validate the matrix’s capacity to discern subtle but impactful relationships within complex environmental systems.

From Association to Prediction: Validating the KAN Matrix Approach

Evaluations reveal that predictive models incorporating knowledge derived from the KAN Matrix consistently exhibit enhanced performance. Utilizing metrics such as the Kling-Gupta Efficiency – which assesses how closely model-predicted values match observed values, accounting for biases and variances – and the commonly used R-squared, researchers found a demonstrable increase in predictive power. This improvement suggests the KAN Matrix effectively identifies nuanced relationships beyond simple linear associations, allowing models to better capture the underlying complexities of the data and generate more accurate forecasts. The gains observed aren’t merely statistical; they translate to a greater capacity to reliably predict outcomes and understand system behavior, showcasing the practical utility of this novel approach to data analysis.

Investigations reveal that Random Forest models, when guided by associations identified through the KAN Matrix, consistently exhibit superior predictive accuracy compared to models that rely exclusively on linear correlations. This enhancement stems from the KAN Matrix’s ability to capture non-linear and complex relationships within data, which traditional linear methods often overlook. By incorporating these nuanced associations, the Random Forest algorithms can build more robust and informative predictive models, effectively discerning patterns and making more accurate forecasts of target variables. The results demonstrate that this approach not only improves prediction rates but also offers a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying data dynamics, ultimately leading to more reliable and insightful outcomes.

Evaluations reveal that a ranking approach based on the KAN Matrix surpasses traditional methods-Pearson Correlation and Mutual Information-in the task of predicting streamflow attributes. Notably, the KAN-based system achieves comparable predictive accuracy while requiring a significantly smaller subset of input attributes. This reduction in required variables demonstrates improved efficiency, as models can be streamlined and computational costs lowered. Furthermore, the parsimony of the KAN approach-its ability to achieve strong performance with fewer parameters-suggests a more robust and generalizable model, less susceptible to overfitting and better equipped to handle complex hydrological systems. The findings highlight the KAN Matrix as a valuable tool for feature selection and model building in streamflow prediction and potentially other environmental modeling applications.

The pursuit of understanding within complex systems often leads to elaboration, yet true insight resides in distillation. This work, introducing KAN-matrices, embodies that principle. It navigates the intricacies of multivariate data, not by adding layers of abstraction, but by revealing underlying nonlinear associations with increased parsimony. As Andrey Kolmogorov observed, “The essence of mathematics is freedom.” This freedom manifests in the KAN-matrix’s ability to untangle feature contributions, offering a clearer, more direct path to physical insight – a reduction of complexity to its essential form. Clarity is the minimum viable kindness.

Further Refinements

The proliferation of data necessitates not merely collection, but distillation. KAN-Matrices offer a reduction in dimensionality through visualization; however, the efficacy of this reduction remains contingent on the underlying data’s structure. Future work must address the limits of interpretability when confronted with truly high-dimensional, chaotic systems – situations where even ‘simplified’ representations obscure more than they reveal. The current framework assumes a degree of stationarity; extending its applicability to non-stationary time series, or streaming data, represents a non-trivial, yet crucial, challenge.

A persistent tension exists between parsimony and fidelity. While KAN-Matrices prioritize clarity, quantifying the information loss inherent in this visualization remains an open question. Developing metrics to assess the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy is paramount. Further investigation into automated feature selection guided by KAN-Matrix analysis-moving beyond visual inspection-could yield algorithms capable of identifying genuinely salient variables, rather than merely those most prominently displayed.

Ultimately, the value of any interpretive tool lies not in its novelty, but in its utility. The true test will be its integration into established workflows, and its demonstrable impact on decision-making. The pursuit of ‘interpretability’ itself must be tempered by a healthy skepticism; a beautifully clear explanation, divorced from empirical validation, is merely a pleasing fiction.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.15755.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-21 20:17