Ticketmaster and Live Nation could be divorcing. What to know about the ongoing antitrust trial

by

After numerous complaints and years of frustration from ticket buyers, the Department of Justice’s antitrust trial against Live Nation has begun.

The Justice Department is accusing Live Nation of forcing musicians to use its marketing services when performing at its venues. Since Live Nation owns a large number of venues, the government argues this practice unfairly limits competition.

The trial in the antitrust case against Live Nation and Ticketmaster began Monday in New York. Lawyers are expected to present their opening arguments on Tuesday. The case, originally filed in 2024, now focuses on whether Live Nation has unfairly used its market power to stifle competition, and whether the company should be split up from its subsidiary, Ticketmaster.

The trial is predicted to take about a month, and Judge Arun Subramanian – the same judge who sentenced Sean Combs last year – will be overseeing the case.

Leaders from Live Nation, including Michael Rapino and Joe Berchtold, are scheduled to testify, along with executives from competing companies such as Anschutz Entertainment Group and Irving Azoff, who previously led Ticketmaster. Several musicians, including Ben Lovett from Mumford & Sons and Kid Rock, might also appear as witnesses.

Key claims in the lawsuit

The lawsuit, brought by the federal government, 39 states, and Washington D.C., claims that Live Nation and Ticketmaster illegally control many parts of the live music business, including promoting concerts, running venues, managing artists, and selling tickets.

I’ve been following the case, and it’s incredible how much power Live Nation and Ticketmaster have. It seems Live Nation works with over 400 artists and basically owns over 265 venues across North America. And Ticketmaster? They dominate the ticket sales game – controlling around 80% of where tickets are initially sold. What’s even more concerning is they’re also expanding into the resale market, giving them even more control over everything.

Hollywood Inc.

Because popular events often have limited tickets, fake or unverified tickets frequently appear on resale websites. California is considering a law to prohibit the sale of these kinds of tickets.

Last month, Judge Subramanian dismissed several major claims that Live Nation operates as a monopoly. This included a claim that Live Nation’s dominance in the industry leads to higher ticket prices and negatively impacts consumers.

The biggest concern revolves around whether Live Nation should be allowed to own Ticketmaster. Their merger in 2010 has always been debated. The Department of Justice also argues that Live Nation pressures venues into using only Ticketmaster for tickets, preventing them from working with other ticket sellers.

For more than ten years, Ticketmaster and Live Nation have talked about making changes, but real competition hasn’t emerged. Now, the industry is at a critical moment, according to Dustin Brighton of the Coalition for Ticket Fairness. They can either create a competitive market that encourages new ideas, or continue with the current system, which limits choices for people who buy tickets.

Brighton explained that the companies who could challenge this dominant market position and create a fairer environment are often blocked by unfair practices, which stifles new ideas and leaves consumers with fewer choices.

Hollywood Inc.

A proposed law in the state would prevent people from reselling tickets for more than 10% above their original price.

Live Nation declined to comment. They previously dismissed the allegations as without merit when the complaint was originally made.

Live Nation believes that while accusing Ticketmaster of being a monopoly might look good for the Department of Justice now, the claim won’t hold up in court. They argue it doesn’t consider how the live entertainment industry actually works.

Next steps after the trial

If Live Nation loses the case, the judge will determine how the company needs to change, potentially forcing them to sell Ticketmaster to another company. Live Nation would still have the option to challenge that decision in a higher court.

Stephen Parker, head of the Independent Venue Association, stated that fines and promises of changed behavior won’t be enough if the court determines Live Nation broke the law.

Parker explained that any financial remedy should match the extent of the damage caused. To achieve this, companies need to carefully consider completely separating their primary ticket sales, resale markets, venue management, tour organization, advertising and sponsorships, and artist representation.

Live Nation is currently dealing with legal challenges, including a lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission and several class-action suits filed by concert attendees.

Read More

2026-03-04 00:32