The terrifying real-life facts behind Netflix’s A House of Dynamite – how accurate is it?

by

Okay, so A House of Dynamite isn’t strictly a horror film, but honestly, it’s absolutely terrifying! It’s this incredible thriller directed by Kathryn Bigelow, and the premise is just… intense. Basically, a single missile is launched at the US, and the government has only about 18 minutes to figure out who’s behind it and what to do. It’s a real edge-of-your-seat kind of movie!

The script repeatedly shows the same sequence of events – from the missile launch to its possible impact on Chicago – but at different levels of government. Each time, it highlights the US defense system’s failure to intercept the missile and demonstrates that there isn’t a single, clear solution to the crisis.

The movie A House of Dynamite doesn’t offer a clear resolution, leaving the President’s decision and the fate of Chicago unknown. Don’t expect a comforting message that this is just a far-fetched story – unfortunately, it feels quite realistic.

What to Read Next

How accurate is A House of Dynamite?

Although we acknowledge there’s much we still don’t understand about how countries handle crises, the evidence suggests that the scenarios depicted in A House of Dynamite aren’t as unrealistic as we might hope.

The movie’s title comes from a quote by the US President about building “a house filled with dynamite,” and it really hits home when you think about the current nuclear state of the world. Basically, nine countries have nukes – over 12,000 of them, if the numbers are right. What’s even more unsettling is that only three of those countries are actually part of NATO. It just feels like a really unstable situation, honestly.

Eighteen minutes might seem like a quick travel time for a missile, but it’s actually realistic. The Union of Concerned Scientists, analyzing US and Russian capabilities, estimates a missile could reach the other country in about 25 minutes. Launching from a submarine would make that journey even faster.

The report also stated that if either country received a warning of an incoming attack, its leaders would have almost no time to determine if the warning was real and decide how to react.

Early warning systems can sometimes be wrong, and, as the movie illustrates, officials are often left to determine if a potential missile threat is genuine. Furthermore, the US missile defense systems aren’t foolproof, a point the movie also highlights.

People often say intercepting a missile is like hitting one bullet with another – a comparison Tom Cruise actually used when talking about the success of Top Gun: Maverick. And it appears to be a very accurate description. The assessment of how well the missile defense system works comes from a test of the US’s existing ground-based interceptors.

He told the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that while everyone agrees missile defense systems could be better, the experts he’s spoken with recognize it’s an incredibly difficult technical challenge, and a perfect solution may never be possible.

As a fan, it’s fascinating to see how the show portrays the immense pressure on the President, even in a fictional crisis! Apparently, if a missile was actually heading for the US, the President would be the one to make the call on what to do. The Pentagon would give them options, but incredibly, they wouldn’t even need to check with advisors first – it’s all on them! I learned that from the Union of Concerned Scientists, and it really highlights the weight of that responsibility.

Has such a situation happened in real-life?

Whenever I think about a really close call, like a moment where disaster almost happened, my mind immediately jumps to the Cuban Missile Crisis. It was the scariest moment of the Cold War, when the US and Soviet Union were closer to actually starting a nuclear war than ever before.

This isn’t exactly like the plot of A House of Dynamite, but it’s worth knowing that there have been a few times when things almost went wrong due to false alarms. There may be other incidents that haven’t been made public, but we’ve highlighted some of the most concerning ones from a report by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

I remember hearing about this crazy incident from October 5th, 1960! Apparently, NORAD went to its highest alert level because they thought the Soviets had launched dozens of missiles at us. It turned out to be a false alarm, though – the radar was actually picking up the moon rising over Norway! Can you believe they almost thought it was a full-scale attack?

On October 28, 1962, during the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis, radar operators in Moorestown, New Jersey mistakenly believed a nuclear attack was beginning. It turned out the alert at 9:02 am was a false alarm. Operators were running a training simulation of a missile launch when a satellite unexpectedly appeared on their screens, leading to the confusion.

On November 9, 1979, a significant incident occurred where the US detected what appeared to be a large-scale Soviet nuclear attack. It turned out to be a false alarm caused by a technician at NORAD who accidentally loaded a training tape – simulating a nuclear attack scenario – into a live computer system.

On September 26, 1983, the Soviet Union’s missile detection system mistakenly indicated that the United States had launched five missiles. Fortunately, a Soviet officer named Stanislav Petrov correctly judged it to be a false alarm and didn’t report the supposed attack. It was later determined that sunlight reflecting off clouds had tricked the satellite into thinking they were missile launches.

A House of Dynamite is available to watch now on Netflix.

The latest issue of Living Legends is now available! You can purchase Ariana & Witches at newsstands or online for only £8.99.

Read More

2025-10-25 23:50