Movies

The Shocking Truth: How ‘The Lord Of The Rings’ Movies Haven’t Aged Well

BBG News

J.R.R. Tolkien significantly shaped modern fantasy literature. His concept of crafting a “fairy story for adults” was widely embraced, and his influence remains strong even now. Nevertheless, as with many books from the 1950s, certain aspects of Tolkien’s work may not resonate as strongly with contemporary readers.

A franchise with outdated aspects doesn’t necessarily equate to a poor one. Just as some elements of The Lord of the Rings may seem dated in modern literature, it doesn’t diminish the pleasure one can derive from them. However, certain parts of the books and iconic films might appear outdated due to their problematic and offensive nature, aspects that were not addressed during their creation.

Fans Still Don’t Understand How He Didn’t Know About His Cousin’s Fate

When Saruman enchants a spell to deter the Fellowship from traversing the Redhorn Pass via mountains, he inadvertently guides them towards the Mines of Moria instead. Although Gandalf is hesitant, Gimli gleams with enthusiasm, enthusiastically sharing tales of the marvels they will encounter due to his dwarven kin’s warmth and generosity. Regrettably, upon the Fellowship’s arrival at the mine, they discover a grim rather than grand spectacle. The once thriving metropolis now resembles a burial ground.

As they make their way through Moria, the group eventually discovers that all the dwarves are deceased, slain by orcs. This left many viewers wondering why Gimli, a close relative of Balin, who was the ruler of Moria among the dwarves, didn’t know about his kin’s demise beforehand. Despite Middle-earth lacking 5G technology, information spreads swiftly, and it appears unusual in this context.

Adapting Such an Expansive Story Proved Difficult

J.R.R. Tolkien’s tale is an expansive epic brimming with intricate details about its world. However, to create a manageable movie trilogy, Peter Jackson had to omit several of these finer points. Though the Lord of the Rings films successfully incorporate significant events, due to these limitations, they inevitably leave behind quite a bit, similar to what gets discarded during film editing.

Similarly, the decisions made by films regarding what to include and leave out can sometimes be perplexing. Certain parts appear overly extended when they could be shortened, while others are abruptly cut short when they might have benefited from more development. These rhythmic inconsistencies are particularly noticeable in the The Hobbit trilogy, which at times seems to strain to expand the source material across three films. It’s worth mentioning that while some spectacular scenes were included, they did little to address the pacing issues.

It’s a Worrying Trend the Director Continued in His Career

In other words, the film adaptations of “The Lord of the Rings,” particularly “The Fellowship of the Ring,” boast impressive, tangible special effects. Detailed creatures such as the Uruk-hai and intricate sets like the Shire can’t be duplicated with digital effects alone. These practical effects contribute significantly to the viewing experience, allowing viewers to become fully engrossed in the narrative and accept the magical occurrences unfolding on screen.

As the storyline progressed in Peter Jackson’s trilogy, his reliance on computer-generated imagery (CGI) also intensified. Critics often cite the depiction of the Army of the Dead in The Return of the King as a moment that marred what should have been an iconic, climactic battle. Jackson’s use of CGI escalated even further in The Hobbit trilogy, with actor Viggo Mortensen, who played Aragorn, expressing his concerns. Mortensen remarked about the increased use of CGI: “In the first movie, there was a certain organic quality to it – actors interacting with each other and real landscapes; it was grittier. The second movie began to expand too much for my taste, and by the third one, there were numerous special effects. It became grandiose, and lost whatever subtlety there was in the first movie. With The Hobbit, it’s like that on a scale of 10.

The Tale Is Purely Good vs. Evil

Similar to other well-known science fiction and fantasy series such as Star Wars and Harry Potter, The Lord of the Rings primarily revolves around the classic theme of good versus evil. The noble dwarves, elves, and humans battle against the malevolent orcs, monsters, and wizards, emerging victorious even when the odds seem stacked against them. The narrative rarely delves into the possibility of moral complexity within a character. Characters labeled as evil consistently remain so, while those portrayed as heroes maintain their heroism throughout.

As a devoted film critic, I find myself compelled to express that Frodo Baggins, in J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic “The Lord of the Rings,” is subtly swayed by the Ring’s corrupting influence. However, it’s not hard to imagine Boromir acting differently without the Ring’s allure. Initially, he seems to covet the Ring’s power, even attempting to seize it from Frodo for his personal benefit. Yet, in a heart-wrenching turn of events, Boromir demonstrates unwavering heroism by sacrificing himself to protect Merry and Pippin. This moral complexity introduced into Middle-earth through Boromir’s character is undeniably one of the most impactful additions in “The Rings of Power.

Not Every Character Is Three-Dimensional

One potential rephrase for your text could be: “One challenge that The Lord of the Rings films encounter is providing depth to all their primary characters due to the size of the Fellowship. As the movie trilogy has a hard time giving each character their own developmental arcs across the series, characters like Sam, Gollum, and Gandalf shine, but not everyone receives equal attention.

In simpler terms, the films often present Merry and Pippin as lazy, comical characters more interested in smoking and eating rather than dealing with the conflicts at hand. Although they have redeeming moments in the second and third movies, viewers don’t get enough time to follow their stories closely enough to appreciate a true character development arc. Similarly, Gimli is primarily depicted as a comedic relief character who rarely shows any emotions other than humor.

Return of the King Fades Out Four Separate Times

The Return of the King” is often hailed as one of the best book-to-screen adaptations ever made, even winning an Academy Award for Best Picture. However, it’s not without its flaws. One aspect that many viewers find frustrating about the movie is its prolonged ending, which seems to linger despite having numerous opportunities for a more impactful conclusion.

Towards the end of the story, “The Return of the King” ends and reappears multiple times. Later, Frodo, Bilbo, and Gandalf are seen joining the Elves in the Land of the Elven-kind, fading to white instead of black this time. Yet, the movie doesn’t conclude as expected, adding an extra scene showing Sam’s life in the Shire before eventually displaying the credits.

Major Characters Like Tom Bombadil and Glorfindel Are Cut from The Films

A common critique of the “Lord of the Rings” films is that some characters directly from the books are completely left out. For instance, Arwen Undomiel, while other characters, such as Glorfindel, see their roles reduced substantially.

Initially, leaving out certain characters was considered a necessary compromise to fit the expansive tale of “The Lord of the Rings” into just three films. But with the advent of streaming, many book adaptations now have the luxury to extend their runtime by including additional characters and subplots from the original works. Consequently, the omission of certain characters in “The Lord of the Rings” becomes increasingly unsettling as time passes.

Saruman’s Death Is only Included in Return Of The King’s Extended Cut

Among the fanbase of J.R.R. Tolkien’s ‘Lord of the Rings’, a significant split emerges between those who lean towards the theatrically released film versions and those drawn to the extended editions. While the latter may be longer, they offer crucial scenes that contribute to a clearer understanding of the narrative. Those opting for the theatrical releases risk overlooking key plot elements otherwise found in the extended editions.

A particularly disheartening manifestation of this pattern can be seen in the final fate of Saruman the White, as depicted in the extended version of The Return of the King. Conversely, the standard film edition fails to address his grisly end, resulting in an oblivious audience about his ultimate destiny.

The Prequel Trilogy Condenses the Timeline of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy

From a fellow film enthusiast, let me share my perspective: Much like some prequels tend to do, the Hobbit films seem to tarnish the grandeur of the Lord of the Rings trilogy for me. Set in an era preceding the Fellowship of the Ring, these three movies aim to establish the foundation for the original series but end up complicating the timeline instead.

In the three-part adaptation of The Hobbit, new plotlines are introduced, such as a confrontation between Gandalf, Saruman, Elrond, and Galadriel against a shadowy Necromancer, who is ultimately revealed to be Sauron himself. Although they triumph in this battle, they understand that Sauron continues to pose a danger. Excluding Saruman’s betrayal, these events make it apparent that some of the most astute characters from Lord of the Rings may have acted unwisely by spending the following decades on unnecessary tasks when they could have been readying themselves for Sauron’s looming return.

Amazon Is Already Working on New Lord Of The Rings Projects

In this era where remakes and revivals are commonplace, it sadly seems unavoidable that many beloved franchises will experience a resurgence in the coming years. The Harry Potter series has already been announced for a Max re-imagining, with Twilight not far behind. Consequently, it appears only a matter of time before The Lord of the Rings franchise follows suit and undergoes its own revival too.

It’s unusual for remakes to be as acclaimed or cherished as the originals, particularly when it comes to a film franchise as admired as the Lord of the Rings adaptations, which are considered the epitome of book-to-screen translations. A series as beloved as Lord of the Rings doesn’t require a reboot. In fact, any attempt at remaking it would struggle to capture the hearts of audiences in the same way the originals did. However, with Amazon’s The Rings of Power spinoff already broadcast and more work in progress, a full Lord of the Rings reboot seems inevitable now.

Jake Gyllenhaal Was Reportedly in the Running to Play Frodo Baggins

In simpler terms, “The Lord of The Rings” boasts an illustrious cast, with Ian McKellen and Viggo Mortensen delivering standout performances that have left a lasting impact on viewers. Yet, upon revisiting the “Lord of The Rings” films, it’s evident that Elijah Wood’s portrayal of Frodo Baggins shows some inconsistencies at times.

There were instances where the scenes felt a bit unnatural and even amusing, such as when Frodo collapsed following Gandalf’s self-sacrifice during their fight with the Balrog. At times, Elijah Wood’s acting seemed overly dramatic, with excessive shouting and portraying pain, which grew tiresome rather fast. Despite this, Elijah Wood did a fantastic job as Frodo, but these moments took away from his overall performance.

Wētā FX Provided the CGI for The Lord of the Rings Trilogy

In the epic films of The Lord of The Rings, the visual effects and CGI were revolutionary, even earning Academy Awards. Yet, after two decades, some scenes appear somewhat rough around the edges to today’s viewers, who are accustomed to more streamlined and realistic CGI effects in modern productions.

A striking moment that caught my attention was Frodo’s dream sequence in “The Fellowship of the Ring,” where he was wounded by the Nazgûl’s Morgul blade. In his dream, set in Rivendell, Elrond appeared transparent and seemed to come and go. This scene was noticeably distinct from the rest of the film, giving off an odd vibe akin to a poorly executed music video. It felt out of sync with the movie’s overall tone, and even today, it maintains that strange quality for viewers.

The Lord of the Rings Includes Some Characters From the Silmarillion

In simpler terms, “The Silmarillion” and other works by Tolkien, such as “The History of Middle Earth,” delve deep into the history of the world. Characters from these works, like Glorfindel the elf, have small roles in “The Lord of the Rings,” but their impact on the storyline is minimal before they depart.

Fans of Tolkien’s works appreciate these appearances of familiar characters, but contemporary readers often find them annoying due to their impact on the storyline. This aspect of Tolkien’s writing style, where characters linger and contribute unexpectedly to the plot, is familiar in series like “A Song of Ice and Fire.” However, it appears that this technique has become less effective in novel form within Tolkien’s work. On the other hand, cameos from occasional characters have been successful in other franchises such as the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Boromir Is the Only Member of the Fellowship to Permanently Die in LOTR

In essence, “The Lord of the Rings” primarily revolves around a conflict, penned by an author who was once a war veteran. It’s surprising that despite these circumstances, none of the principal characters meet their untimely end. In truth, the only Fellowship member to suffer a permanent demise is Boromir.

Absolutely, a character doesn’t necessitate losing their life to be impacted by war; this was something Tolkien himself keenly understood. Yet, contemporary audiences often associate death and grim elements with increased realism in fiction. Some readers might find a story where all the principal characters escape harm outdated compared to their expectations from modern literature.

Merry and Pippin Have the Least Agency of the Fellowship

Modern readers tend to appreciate main characters who exhibit self-determination within their stories; those who lack this quality are often criticized. For instance, Bella Swan from Twilight was frequently disliked by readers because of her passive role throughout the storyline.

In “The Two Towers,” Merry and Pippin are predominantly characters who take minimal action. They start off as captives among a band of orcs, remaining in that state until the Rohirrim slay the orcs, effectively liberating them with minimal resistance. Subsequently, they mainly watch as the Ents demolish Isengard. The creators of the film adaptation of “The Two Towers” recognized that contemporary audiences might find this portrayal of the Hobbits unsatisfying and decided to modify their narrative to give them more active roles.

Frodo Leaves the Shire Over 40 Minutes into The Lord of the Rings

Unlike many contemporary works that aim to grab attention instantly, I find that “The Lord of the Rings” takes its time to set the stage for the story. In a world filled with an abundance of fiction, it is understandable that books today strive to captivate readers from the very beginning. However, being published in a different era, “The Lord of the Rings” doesn’t carry the same immediate urgency.

For those accustomed to fantasy tales that leap into action or reach their peak right away, the beginning of “The Fellowship of the Ring” may seem old-fashioned and leisurely paced. Today’s readers, accustomed to more dynamic storytelling styles, might find the initial, somewhat formal explanation of Hobbits a bit too slow, as reading preferences have shifted over time.

Amazon’s The Rings of Power Was Heavily Scrutinized for Its Diverse Cast

Readers of books would concur that the “The Lord of the Rings” novels boast a rich diversity, with numerous races populating the fictional universe they portray. Regrettably, when it comes to the movies, none of these diverse characters were played by Black actors, a fact that becomes strikingly apparent on repeat viewings.

It’s crucial that cinema embraces diversity now more than ever, as the absence of it in past films can diminish their impact. Representing BIPOC actors enriches the narrative landscape, making room for a variety of stories, not just those centered around white characters. For instance, while “LOtR” was deeply influenced by Norse and British mythology, it could have been made more diverse in its film adaptations, as demonstrated in the “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” television series.

Frodo’s Reunion With the Fellowship Is Ultimately Underwhelming

In one of the final scenes from “The Lord of The Rings” trilogy, as depicted in “Return of the King”, Frodo had a reunion with Gandalf. Later, he joined the rest of his Fellowship companions. This scene stood out from the rest of the movie because all characters were just laughing slowly, without any spoken dialogue between them.

The prolonged slow-motion felt excessively lengthy, making for an odd viewing experience. Despite the heartfelt conclusion and the effective use of nonverbal communication among characters, the overall combination seemed awkwardly put together.

It Is Implied That Every Orc in Lord of the Rings Is Evil

In J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” some races are consistently portrayed as universally evil, a clichéd approach to fantasy storytelling. For example, orcs, uruks, and goblins are only depicted as villainous adversaries, thus stereotyping an entire species in a rather repetitive way.

As a movie enthusiast, I find the sentiment expressed by Tolkien, “nothing is evil at its core,” profoundly true. Nevertheless, when The Lord of the Rings paints every member of a particular race as villainous, it leans towards simplistic dualism that overlooks complexity and nuance. Even if these races are fictional, the concept that an entire group shares unchangeable traits from birth is outdated and problematic.

No Female Main Characters Interact Throughout the Lord Of The Rings Trilogy

In the epic tale “The Lord of the Rings,” a significant number of characters are male. The female characters, as depicted by Tolkien, often take a secondary role or are primarily defined through their connections with the male characters in the narrative. From a modern perspective, this approach to storytelling may not meet contemporary standards.

Just as it’s crucial to have diverse racial representation in media, it is equally significant to present characters of various genders. While J.R.R. Tolkien’s female characters such as Éowyn slaying the Witch King are commendable moments, the women often lack individuality and seem more like extensions of the male-centric storyline rather than fully realized characters with their own lives and aspirations.

Read More

2025-04-20 02:26

Previous post Haley Joel Osment’s Real Reason for Ski Trip Leading to Arrest Revealed
Next post Farscape’s Unfinished Romance: Is Crichton & Aeryn’s Love Doomed?