Strictly’s bullying investigation delayed after Jermaine Jenas BBC sacking as channel goes from ‘one disaster to the next’
As a seasoned journalist with years of experience under my belt, I must say the ongoing investigations surrounding Strictly Come Dancing are proving to be quite the rollercoaster. The tension is palpable, and it’s not just the dancers who are waiting with bated breath for the outcome.
According to Mail Online, the investigation into Strictly Come Dancing at the BBC is being influenced by the controversy surrounding its former host, Jermaine Jenas.
As someone who has spent a considerable amount of time working in corporate environments, I have learned that investigations into allegations can take unexpected twists and turns. In my experience, it is not uncommon for a company to be expected to announce the findings of an investigation into accusations made by an employee within a given week. However, these timelines are often subject to change based on factors such as the complexity of the case, the need for further evidence, and the cooperation of all parties involved. In this situation, I would advise patience and caution, knowing that the Corporation will make the necessary announcements when they have fully evaluated the claims made by Amanda Abbington.
Previously, the actress who played Sherlock Holmes left the show, and at a later time, she made a sequence of allegations concerning her dance partner, Giovanni Pernice.
A reliable source connected to the investigation indicates that the BBC may not release their conclusions before next week at the absolute latest.
It’s also now thought the probe could stretch into next month.
An informant remarked: ‘Currently, the BBC is facing a series of calamities, one following another, resembling a perfect storm.’
They were already managing a situation involving Huw Edwards, but the Jermaine Jenas controversy seems to have suddenly surfaced, catching them off guard.
They fully comprehend the necessity to reveal the results of the Strictly Come Dancing inquiry, understanding that everyone is looking towards them for this information.
As a lifestyle expert, I understand that when speaking about sensitive topics, especially investigations, it’s crucial to navigate the conversation carefully. Timing is key, as we want to avoid unnecessary scrutiny and ensure all queries are addressed promptly. So, let’s make sure our words are chosen wisely and our timing is impeccable, to provide clarity and transparency throughout the process.
In January, the Strictly controversy arose when actress Amanda Abbington claimed abuse against her dance partner, Giovanni Pernice, following her sudden departure from the program only five weeks into it.
50-year-old actress Amanda, who played Sherlock, has levied a string of allegations against Giovanni regarding his instructional techniques, characterizing his behavior as “unjustified, harsh, unkind, and malicious.” However, Giovanni vigorously refutes all these accusations.
Meanwhile Jermaine was sacked from the channel this week for sending inappropriate texts to women.
41-year-old speaker confessed that he felt both embarrassed and regretful. He acknowledged his actions of incessantly exchanging explicit messages with a woman, whom he met at a professional gathering, lasted an entire day.
Regarding the current inquiries, the source noted: ‘These investigations are essentially completed. A few minor details remain to be looked into, but they are nearly concluded. There’s been a significant amount of work done this week on wrapping them up.’
‘But BBC top brass aren’t going to rushing into announcing anything until the timing is right.
It seems extremely frustrating for Amanda and Giovanni, as they have patiently waited for quite some time now, eager to learn about the final results.
They’ve both cooperated fully by answering questions, providing evidence, and collaborating with the investigators, which includes two ex-MET officers, throughout the process, so it’s only natural that they are eager to learn about the BBC’s decision now.
The row could potentially escalate, leading it to erupt at the beginning of the upcoming series, which is something the producers were keen to avoid.
1. They aim to close this matter and focus on arranging the show again, but the Strictly situation remains unresolved for now. (Paraphrased)
According to a reliable source, it has been clarified to TopMob that the inquiry within the show and Jermain’s termination are completely separate incidents, and implying any connection between them would be inaccurate.
Amanda described the dance show as “similar to the trenches” during an interview with Channel 4 News. She claimed that BBC producers were shocked and dismayed by footage that reportedly showed inappropriate and humiliating behavior of a sexual nature.
Moving forward, I found myself embroiled in a deeper controversy in July, when news surfaced that my dismissal from Strictly Come Dancing was due to an incident involving a misunderstanding with my dance partner, the talented Zara McDermott of Love Island fame. It’s important to note that I value respect and professionalism above all else in my lifestyle philosophy.
For the upcoming 20th anniversary series of the show, neither Giovanni nor Graziano will be making a comeback as rehearsals are already progressing quite nicely.
Later on, Graziano stated that he’s unaware of all the specific details regarding the actions he’s been accused of.
The BBC cannot disclose more information because it concerns confidential situations where data was obtained, and they have duties towards other involved parties.
Last week, it became known that Amanda perceived the BBC executives’ interrogation as extremely disrespectful during their investigation into misconduct.
It emerged that the actress was questioned again concerning a controversial video she received from Giovanni, along with an inappropriate comment he allegedly made about another contestant during the same incident.
The dancer was alleged to have joked inappropriately about someone from Amanda’s family. Subsequently, BBC executives inquired of Amanda if the dancer intended the comment as harmless fun.
A source told The Sun: ‘[Amanda] found this line of questioning highly offensive.’
Regarding the claimed video, they stated to the publication: ‘The BBC must acknowledge that they received the video. There appears to be a path of proof supporting this.’
Although it’s clear that the footage was likely shared with good intentions, the BBC is worried that such action might violate the agreed-upon code of conduct within their contract for the professional dancers.
A representative from the BBC stated: ‘Just as we’ve mentioned earlier, we won’t be discussing specific people or indulging in guesswork.’
Read More
- TOMI PREDICTION. TOMI cryptocurrency
- JPY KRW PREDICTION
- MANA PREDICTION. MANA cryptocurrency
- EVER PREDICTION. EVER cryptocurrency
- ORN PREDICTION. ORN cryptocurrency
- DVF PREDICTION. DVF cryptocurrency
- SYLO PREDICTION. SYLO cryptocurrency
- RTM PREDICTION. RTM cryptocurrency
- TRI PREDICTION. TRI cryptocurrency
- GGG PREDICTION. GGG cryptocurrency
2024-08-24 16:49