Movies

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan worked because Nicolas Meyer understood the villain

BBG News

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan worked because Nicolas Meyer understood the villain

As a seasoned gamer who’s traversed the vast cosmos of Star Trek lore, I can confidently say that Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan stands as one of the most iconic stories in the franchise, and quite possibly, in all of science fiction history. It’s a movie that defies conventional wisdom and leaves us awestruck, even if the so-called experts don’t always see eye to eye.

When discussing memorable tales from Star Trek, a lot of people immediately think of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. This is because it’s often considered one of the finest films not only in Star Trek lore but also in the broader history of science fiction. While its exact position compared to other movies might be debated by industry insiders, we can confidently say that it stands among the best. Despite differing opinions from experts, its quality is widely acknowledged.

1. This movie is extraordinary and accomplishes something that many struggle with. They revived a plot from the initial narrative and developed it further, yet in a manner that doesn’t require viewing of the original series to grasp the film’s purpose. Khan Noonien Singh made an impressive debut in the original series’ “Space Seed” episode, but there was a missing element.

When the story was revisited in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, director Nicholas Meyer understood the necessary course of action; it was essential to maintain distance between Khan and hero James T. Kirk. After all, if they were to engage in a physical confrontation, Kirk would undoubtedly be overmatched against a genetically enhanced adversary like Khan.

Meyer made sure to keep them separate, which resulted in him never filming them together on set. This was something he himself acknowledged during his interview with TrekMovie.com.

Well, I don’t know how good I am at analyzing my own stuff. I do know that they wanted to have a mano a mano, a fight between Kirk and Khan. And I said, “Well, they tried that in ‘Space Seed’ and it looked phony and stupid to me.” Khan is a superman. Kirk wouldn’t stand a chance against him. It just seemed kind of corny… So I resisted the idea of this mano a mano shootout, or whatever it was supposed to be, in favor of cribbing from one of my favorite movies, The Enemy Below which is a World War II duel between a destroyer and a U-boat, and Robert Mitchum, who’s the captain of the destroyer, and Curd Jürgens, who is the captain of the U-boat, they never meet. It’s just their weapons that meet.

It’s logical to separate Khan and Kirk because Khan would clearly defeat Kirk in a fight. This is why, in the revival of the concept (Into Darkness), Khan overpowered every opponent he faced – except for Spock.

From a fan’s perspective, it’s undeniable that Vulcans possess a superior strength compared to humans, making Khan an incredibly formidable adversary. The way they portrayed Khan and the intense confrontations between him and the crew were some of the film’s finest moments. These scenes beautifully echoed Meyer’s interpretation of the original story, which only served to strengthen my admiration for his adaptation.

Instead of another director opting for a more spectacular fight sequence at the expense of Khan, Meyer chose restraint. This shielded the villain from being over-exposed unnecessarily, resulting in a climactic ending that felt deserved and authentic. This decision, perhaps even the primary reason, significantly contributes to why the film has such enduring appeal.

Attempting to replicate Wrath of Khan might not result in a film that holds the same iconic status within Star Trek fan circles as the original one does.

Read More

2024-08-30 05:23

Previous post Nine, Seven and Ten caught up in wild TV blunder as networks call the same guest by three different names – and the one clue that could have spared them embarrassment