Soft Steps Forward: Teaching Robots to Feel Their Way

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

Researchers have developed a learning-based control system that allows a pneumatically powered soft quadruped robot to navigate varied terrain using tactile feedback.

This work demonstrates the benefits of integrating tactile sensing and reinforcement learning for robust closed-loop locomotion in soft robots.

Achieving robust locomotion remains a significant challenge for soft robots due to their inherent complexities and limited perceptual feedback. This is addressed in ‘SENSE-STEP: Learning Sim-to-Real Locomotion for a Sensory-Enabled Soft Quadruped Robot’, which presents a learning-based control framework integrating tactile sensing and reinforcement learning for a pneumatically actuated soft quadruped. The resulting policy demonstrably improves closed-loop locomotion speed by up to 91% on inclines, exceeding open-loop baseline performance and highlighting the benefits of sensory integration. Could this approach pave the way for more adaptable and resilient soft robots capable of navigating challenging real-world terrains?

Rigid Robots Hit a Wall: Introducing TASQ

Conventional quadruped robots, typically constructed with rigid materials and precisely engineered joints, frequently encounter difficulties when operating outside of highly structured settings. These robots often lack the flexibility necessary to negotiate uneven terrain, absorb unexpected impacts, or maintain stability when confronted with unpredictable obstacles. The rigidity that enables precise movements in controlled environments becomes a liability when faced with the complexities of real-world conditions, leading to reduced adaptability and a higher risk of falls or operational failure. Consequently, there’s been growing interest in developing robotic systems capable of gracefully handling the inherent uncertainties present in unstructured environments, inspiring designs that prioritize compliance and robustness over absolute precision.

The development of TASQ represents a significant departure from conventional quadrupedal robots, employing a unique combination of pneumatic actuation and advanced tactile sensing to achieve more adaptable and robust locomotion. Rather than relying on rigid motors and pre-programmed movements, TASQ utilizes pressurized air to power its limbs, granting it a remarkable degree of flexibility and compliance. This soft robotic approach is further enhanced by a network of tactile sensors embedded throughout its limbs and body, allowing the robot to ‘feel’ its environment and respond dynamically to uneven terrain or unexpected obstacles. By integrating these two technologies, TASQ doesn’t simply react to its surroundings, it actively senses and adapts, paving the way for robots capable of navigating complex, real-world environments with greater ease and efficiency.

TASQ distinguishes itself from conventional robots through its uniquely compliant design, yielding substantial benefits in challenging environments. The robot’s soft construction-achieved via pneumatic actuation-allows it to conform to uneven surfaces and absorb impacts, effectively mitigating the risks associated with navigating complex terrain like rocky fields or cluttered indoor spaces. This inherent flexibility isn’t merely about physical resilience; it fundamentally alters how the robot interacts with its surroundings, enabling a gentler, more stable contact that’s crucial for delicate manipulation or safe interaction with humans and fragile objects. Unlike rigid robots that often rely on precise positioning and force control, TASQ leverages its compliance to passively adapt, simplifying control algorithms and enhancing robustness against unexpected disturbances or imperfect environmental maps.

From Jerky Steps to Controlled Motion: Closed-Loop Control and Imitation Learning

Closed-loop control forms the foundational architecture for robot locomotion, operating by continuously measuring the robot’s state through sensory input – including joint angles, velocities, and ground contact forces – and comparing these values to desired setpoints. Any deviation between the measured state and the desired state generates an error signal which is then fed back into the control system. This feedback loop allows the system to dynamically adjust actuator commands in real-time, correcting for disturbances and ensuring the robot accurately follows the intended trajectory. This contrasts with open-loop control, which lacks this feedback mechanism and is therefore susceptible to accumulated errors. The implementation utilizes proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers, alongside more advanced model predictive control (MPC) strategies, to optimize these adjustments and maintain stability during locomotion.

Initialization of the robot’s locomotion controller utilizes imitation learning through behavior cloning. This process involves training the controller to mimic actions demonstrated by a pre-existing, defined gait. Specifically, the controller learns to map observed states to corresponding control actions – joint torques and positions – recorded during the execution of this reference gait. By directly learning from expert demonstrations, behavior cloning bypasses the need for extensive random exploration, enabling the rapid establishment of a functional, albeit initially limited, gait as a starting point for further learning and adaptation.

Behavior cloning, utilized to initialize the robot’s control system, relies on a pre-defined reference gait – a set of pre-recorded joint positions and velocities representing a desired locomotion pattern. This data serves as the training dataset for the imitation learning process, allowing the robot to learn a direct mapping from sensor observations to control actions. By starting with a functional gait, the robot avoids the challenges of random exploration and significantly reduces the time required to achieve stable and coordinated movement; the pre-defined gait provides a strong initial policy that is then refined through subsequent learning stages.

Establishing a functional gait through imitation learning serves as a critical initialization step, providing a robust baseline for subsequent learning algorithms to build upon. This initial phase circumvents the challenges of random exploration in complex locomotion tasks, significantly reducing training time and improving sample efficiency. By starting with a pre-defined, successful gait, the robot avoids unstable or inefficient movements during early learning stages, enabling faster adaptation to environmental variations and the incorporation of more sophisticated control strategies. This refined locomotion capability is then achieved through techniques like reinforcement learning or adaptive control, which build upon the initial gait provided by behavior cloning.

Robustness Through Chaos: Reinforcement Learning and Domain Randomization

Traditional robotic control often relies on pre-programmed behaviors which exhibit limited adaptability in dynamic or unpredictable environments. To address this, we implemented a reinforcement learning (RL) framework wherein the robot learns to optimize its control policy through iterative trial and error. This approach allows the robot to autonomously discover effective strategies for locomotion and manipulation by maximizing a defined reward function. The RL agent interacts with a simulated environment, receiving feedback on its actions and adjusting its control parameters to improve performance over time. This contrasts with manually designed controllers, which require explicit specification of all possible scenarios and responses, and are therefore less flexible and robust to unforeseen circumstances.

Generalization remains a significant hurdle in reinforcement learning, as policies trained in simulation often fail to transfer effectively to real-world scenarios due to discrepancies between the simulated and real environments. To mitigate this, we employ domain randomization during the training process. This technique involves systematically varying simulation parameters – including aspects like friction coefficients, mass distributions, actuator delays, and environmental textures – across training episodes. By exposing the reinforcement learning agent to a diverse range of simulated conditions, the resulting control policy is forced to learn robust features that are less sensitive to specific simulation settings, thereby improving its ability to adapt and perform reliably in the unpredictable real world.

Domain randomization improves controller robustness by training the system on a diverse set of simulated environments. This involves systematically varying parameters such as friction coefficients, mass distribution, actuator delays, and visual textures during the training process. By experiencing a wide range of conditions, the controller learns to generalize beyond the specific parameters of the simulation and becomes less sensitive to discrepancies between the simulated and real worlds. This approach effectively expands the “reality gap” the controller must bridge, resulting in improved performance and adaptability when deployed in previously unseen, real-world environments.

Quantitative evaluation of the implemented reinforcement learning and domain randomization pipeline demonstrates significant performance gains in locomotion. Specifically, the trained controller achieved a 41% increase in average locomotion speed on flat terrain and a 91% increase on a 5° inclined surface when compared to an open-loop control baseline. These results indicate successful transfer of learned policies from simulation to the physical robot, validating the effectiveness of the approach in bridging the sim-to-real gap and improving robot adaptability in varying environments.

The Inevitable Trade-offs: Pneumatic Hysteresis and Future Directions

Pneumatic actuation, celebrated for its inherent compliance and adaptability, presents a unique challenge in the form of hysteresis – a lagging response where the system’s current state is dependent not only on the present input, but also on its prior history. This phenomenon arises from the non-linear elasticity of the materials used and the time required for air to compress and expand within the system. Consequently, a given pressure input doesn’t translate to an immediate and predictable positional change; instead, the actuator ‘remembers’ its past movements, introducing a delay and potentially compromising precision. Addressing this hysteresis is crucial for achieving reliable and repeatable control in soft robotic systems, as it directly impacts the ability to execute complex tasks and interact predictably with external environments.

The inherent compliance of pneumatically actuated robots, while beneficial for interaction, introduces a challenge known as hysteresis – a lag between input and output due to the system’s previous state. To overcome this, a sophisticated control strategy was developed, employing feedforward terms derived from a system identification process and coupled with feedback from both tactile and inertial sensors. This approach proactively anticipates and compensates for the pneumatic delays, effectively minimizing positional errors and ensuring consistently accurate movements. By modeling and actively counteracting hysteresis, the robot achieves a level of precision typically associated with rigid systems, demonstrating the viability of soft robotics for tasks demanding repeatable and reliable performance.

The integration of tactile feedback and inertial sensing proves crucial to the TASQ robot’s performance, demonstrably enhancing its ability to overcome the limitations of pneumatic actuation. Researchers found a substantial 56% improvement in operational effectiveness when these sensors were actively utilized, compared to scenarios where sensor data was unavailable. This enhancement stems from the system’s increased awareness of its own state and its interaction with the environment; tactile sensors provide information about contact forces, while inertial measurements track movement and acceleration. By incorporating these data streams into the control strategy, the system proactively compensates for inherent delays and inaccuracies, enabling more precise and reliable movements, even in the presence of pneumatic hysteresis. This synergistic effect highlights the potential of multi-modal sensing to significantly advance the capabilities of soft robotic systems.

The TASQ robot serves as a compelling demonstration of how soft robotics, when paired with sophisticated control algorithms, can move beyond laboratory settings and address practical, real-world problems. This innovative system leverages the inherent compliance of pneumatically-actuated structures – allowing it to interact with complex and unpredictable environments – while simultaneously employing advanced sensing and control to overcome limitations like pneumatic hysteresis. Through careful integration of tactile feedback and inertial measurement, TASQ achieves precise and reliable movements, showcasing a pathway towards robots capable of navigating delicate tasks in fields ranging from minimally invasive surgery to search and rescue operations. The successful implementation of these technologies within the TASQ platform suggests a future where robots are not simply automated machines, but adaptable and intuitive partners in a variety of challenging scenarios.

The pursuit of robust locomotion, as demonstrated by this work with the soft quadruped, inevitably reveals the limitations of even the most elegant control frameworks. Researchers strive for seamless sim-to-real transfer, yet production environments-uneven surfaces, unexpected obstacles-always introduce complexity. G. H. Hardy observed, “A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns.” This pursuit of ‘perfect’ patterns in control-the idealized simulations-will always be challenged by the messy reality of deployment. The integration of tactile sensing is a practical step, acknowledging that the robot must feel its way through the world, patching the gaps in the theoretical model. It’s a sophisticated fix for a fundamentally imperfect system, and that’s simply how things go.

The Road Ahead

This work, predictably, doesn’t solve soft robot locomotion. It merely pushes the inevitable failure modes to slightly more complex scenarios. Integrating tactile sensing is a logical step – a robot bumping into things is, at least, predictably malfunctioning. The real challenge remains the translation of simulation to reality, a task perpetually haunted by the ghost of unmodeled compliance. One anticipates a future filled with increasingly baroque simulation techniques, each a desperate attempt to anticipate the myriad ways physics will stubbornly refuse to cooperate.

The emphasis on reinforcement learning, while fashionable, feels less like a breakthrough and more like exchanging one set of hand-tuned parameters for another, only now the tuning happens at runtime, and with significantly more computational expense. It’s a clever trick, certainly, but let’s not mistake statistical optimization for genuine intelligence. The system will likely excel within the training distribution, then collapse spectacularly when confronted with anything remotely novel – a slightly uneven patch of flooring, perhaps, or the audacity of an inclined plane exceeding 15 degrees.

Ultimately, this work contributes to a growing body of evidence suggesting that controlling soft robots is fundamentally hard. The elegance of the theoretical framework is almost immediately consumed by the messy realities of material properties, actuator hysteresis, and the simple fact that, unlike rigid robots, these things are designed to deform. It’s not progress, precisely. It’s just accruing technical debt. And, as anyone who’s spent time in production can attest, that debt always comes due.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.13078.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-02-16 12:23