Smarter, Greener Systems: Building Resilience into Collaborative Networks

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

New research outlines a framework for optimizing both the reliability and environmental impact of interconnected cyber-physical systems.

This work develops agent-based policies and leverages containerization to mitigate catastrophic forgetting and enhance green resilience in online learning environments for cyber-physical systems.

Balancing operational robustness with environmental sustainability presents a significant challenge for increasingly complex cyber-physical systems. This dissertation, ‘Green Resilience of Cyber-Physical Systems: Doctoral Dissertation’, introduces a novel framework to address this trade-off in online collaborative AI systems, demonstrating that agent-based policies and containerization can significantly improve recovery time, stabilize performance, and reduce human dependency while minimizing energy impact. Empirical results reveal that reinforcement learning-driven policies offer the strongest performance gains, though containerization proves highly effective in curtailing CO2 emissions. Can these strategies pave the way for truly sustainable and resilient intelligent systems across diverse application domains?

The Rising Imperative of Resilient and Sustainable Systems

The proliferation of Online Collaborative AI Systems (OL-CAIS) across diverse applications – from real-time traffic management and financial modeling to distributed scientific research and emergency response – signifies a growing reliance on their consistent and adaptable performance. These systems, characterized by their capacity to integrate inputs from multiple sources and operate continuously, are no longer confined to controlled laboratory settings; instead, they function within inherently unpredictable, dynamic environments. This shift necessitates a move beyond static benchmarks, demanding that OL-CAIS exhibit robustness not only in ideal conditions, but also when confronted with fluctuating data streams, network interruptions, and unforeseen user behaviors. Consequently, the ability to maintain accuracy and efficiency while operating in real-world complexity is paramount to the successful implementation and widespread adoption of these increasingly vital technologies.

Historically, the development of Online Collaborative AI Systems (OL-CAIS) has largely centered on maximizing computational performance, often overlooking critical considerations like energy consumption and the ability to withstand unexpected failures. This emphasis on speed and throughput frequently resulted in designs that demand substantial power resources and lack redundancy, rendering them vulnerable to disruptions – be it network outages, hardware malfunctions, or even sudden shifts in user demand. Consequently, these systems, while capable of impressive feats, present a precarious trade-off: high performance achieved at the cost of sustainability and reliability, ultimately hindering their long-term practicality and widespread adoption. This approach fails to account for the growing need for systems that can operate efficiently and consistently, even under challenging conditions, and the escalating environmental concerns associated with energy-intensive computing.

Achieving sustainable and reliable operation of Online Collaborative AI Systems (OL-CAIS) necessitates a careful balancing of resilience and greenness. Historically, system design often prioritized performance, frequently at the cost of energy efficiency and the ability to withstand disruptions like network outages or component failures. However, a solely performance-focused approach is increasingly untenable given growing environmental concerns and the escalating demand for uninterrupted service. Integrating strategies that enhance both the system’s capacity to recover from adverse events and minimize its energy footprint is therefore paramount. This involves innovative techniques in areas such as adaptive resource allocation, fault-tolerant algorithms, and the utilization of renewable energy sources, ensuring that OL-CAIS can not only perform effectively but also operate responsibly and consistently in the face of dynamic challenges and resource constraints.

The sustained functionality of Online Collaborative AI Systems (OL-CAIS) isn’t simply about achieving peak performance today; it’s inextricably linked to their ability to withstand future disruptions and operate sustainably. As these systems become increasingly integrated into critical infrastructure and daily life, their long-term viability hinges on a dual commitment to both resilience and greenness. A system that prioritizes speed or efficiency at the cost of robustness is vulnerable to outages from unexpected events – be they network failures, data corruption, or malicious attacks. Conversely, a resilient system that consumes excessive energy poses an unsustainable burden on resources and contributes to environmental concerns. Therefore, future development must recognize that true longevity for OL-CAIS demands a harmonious balance, ensuring they remain both dependable and environmentally responsible for years to come.

A Proactive Framework for Resilience and Sustainability

The GResilience Framework is a newly developed methodology designed to generate policies for Online Learning Cyber-Physical Systems (OL-CAIS) that simultaneously address resilience and greenness considerations. Unlike reactive approaches, this framework focuses on proactive policy development, meaning policies are formulated to anticipate and mitigate potential disruptions while minimizing environmental impact. The core principle is to balance competing objectives – ensuring system functionality under stress and reducing resource consumption – through a structured and repeatable process. This allows for the creation of policies that move beyond simply maintaining operational status to actively improving both the robustness and sustainability of OL-CAIS deployments.

The GResilience Framework incorporates a tiered policy approach, employing one-agent, two-agent, and reinforcement learning (RL)-based strategies to address resilience and greenness in Operational Land-Critical Infrastructure Systems (OL-CAIS). The one-agent approach facilitates centralized decision-making, while the two-agent model enables distributed control and negotiation between infrastructure operators and environmental stakeholders. Reinforcement learning provides an adaptive strategy, allowing the system to learn optimal policies through interaction with a simulated environment and iterative refinement based on defined reward functions. This multi-faceted approach allows for comparative analysis and selection of the most appropriate policy, or a hybrid solution, based on specific system characteristics and performance objectives.

The one-agent policy within the GResilience Framework employs the Weighted Sum Model (WSM) as its core optimization technique. The WSM consolidates multiple, potentially conflicting objectives – such as maximizing system resilience and promoting green infrastructure – into a single, scalar value. This is achieved by assigning a weight, $w_i$, to each objective $f_i$, resulting in a weighted sum: $\sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i f_i$. The weights, which sum to one, represent the relative importance of each objective and are determined by the policymaker. By adjusting these weights, the WSM allows for exploration of the Pareto front, enabling identification of solutions that best balance resilience and greenness according to specific priorities. The resulting scalar value then serves as the objective function for optimization algorithms.

Prior to the GResilience Framework, development of Operational Land-Critical Infrastructure Systems (OL-CAIS) resilience often relied on reactive, case-by-case solutions lacking a unifying theoretical basis. This ad hoc approach frequently resulted in suboptimal trade-offs between resilience and sustainability goals. The GResilience Framework addresses this limitation by establishing a defined, repeatable methodology for policy development. This structured approach enables systematic evaluation of diverse policy options – including one-agent, two-agent, and reinforcement learning strategies – against pre-defined resilience and greenness criteria, fostering a more principled and proactive system design process and facilitating consistent, comparable analysis of different infrastructure configurations.

Evidence of Enhanced Efficiency Through Containerization and Monitoring

Containerization enhances system resilience and sustainability through resource efficiency and isolation. By packaging applications with their dependencies into standardized units, containers enable optimized allocation of computing resources, minimizing waste and maximizing utilization. This approach demonstrably reduces energy consumption, with reported decreases of up to 50% compared to traditional deployment methods. Isolation between containers prevents failures in one application from cascading to others, improving overall system stability and uptime. The lightweight nature of containers also facilitates rapid scaling and deployment, further contributing to resource optimization and reduced operational costs.

System performance within the OL-CAIS is assessed through continuous monitoring using the Autonomous Classification Ratio (ACR). The ACR functions as a quantitative metric, evaluating the effectiveness of implemented policies by measuring the system’s ability to correctly classify inputs autonomously. This ratio is calculated iteratively, providing a dynamic assessment of policy adherence and system stability. Data contributing to the ACR includes classification accuracy, response times, and resource utilization, allowing for precise identification of performance degradation or policy failures. Regular ACR analysis enables proactive adjustments to maintain optimal system function and resilience.

Continuous system monitoring is essential to mitigate catastrophic forgetting, a phenomenon where previously learned information is lost as new data is introduced, thereby degrading overall system resilience. Within the OL-CAIS, the Autonomous Classification Ratio (ACR) serves as the primary metric for detecting and addressing this issue. A decline in ACR indicates potential forgetting, and the system initiates recovery procedures. Successful recovery, and a return to acceptable resilience levels, is defined as the ACR reaching a threshold of 30 iterations, signifying that the system has effectively relearned and retained critical information.

The Autonomous Classification Ratio (ACR) serves as the primary quantitative indicator of resilience within the Online Learning-based Cyber-Attack Intelligent System (OL-CAIS). Specifically, the ACR measures the system’s sustained ability to correctly classify attack vectors following policy implementation or system updates. Operationalizing resilience requires a verifiable metric; the ACR provides this by tracking classification accuracy over time. A consistently high ACR demonstrates the system maintains its defensive capabilities, while a declining ACR signals potential performance degradation requiring intervention. The threshold for recovery, defined as 30 iterations, is directly linked to ACR performance, ensuring resilience is not merely a stated goal but a demonstrably achieved state within the OL-CAIS.

Realizing Impact and Charting Future Directions in Green Resilient Systems

A comprehensive systematic literature review revealed a significant absence of integrated approaches addressing both resilience and sustainability within cyber-physical systems. Existing research often treated these concepts in isolation, overlooking the potential for synergistic benefits and creating vulnerabilities in increasingly complex infrastructures. This gap highlighted the need for a framework capable of simultaneously enhancing system robustness against disruptions and minimizing environmental impact. The findings from this review directly informed the development of the GResilience Framework, prioritizing adaptability, resource efficiency, and the ability to maintain critical functionality under adverse conditions while actively reducing carbon emissions. The resulting design emphasizes proactive strategies for anticipating and mitigating risks, coupled with innovative techniques for optimizing energy consumption and minimizing waste – features demonstrably lacking in previously published methodologies.

The GResilience Framework’s viability was confirmed through a focused evaluation utilizing CORAL, a collaborative robot designed for flexible manufacturing environments. This case study involved deploying the framework to manage CORAL’s operations, specifically examining its capacity to maintain performance under simulated disruptions while simultaneously minimizing energy consumption. Results indicated the framework successfully adapted to changing conditions, rerouting tasks and adjusting operational parameters to uphold productivity even when faced with component failures or unexpected demands. Importantly, CORAL’s performance under the GResilience Framework showcased a tangible balance between robust operation and environmental responsibility, proving the framework isn’t merely theoretical but a practical solution for building genuinely sustainable and resilient cyber-physical systems.

A compelling demonstration of the GResilience Framework’s efficacy involved its implementation with CORAL, a collaborative robot, revealing a significant synergy between operational resilience and environmental sustainability. Through strategic containerization-optimizing resource allocation and minimizing idle time-the study showcased a remarkable 50% reduction in CO2 emissions during robotic operations. This outcome isn’t merely theoretical; it provides concrete evidence that balancing system robustness with green computing principles is achievable in practical deployments, offering a pathway towards more ecologically responsible automation and highlighting the framework’s potential to minimize the environmental footprint of cyber-physical systems without compromising performance or reliability.

Ongoing development of the GResilience Framework prioritizes adaptation to increasingly intricate and volatile operational landscapes. Future iterations will integrate advanced predictive modeling and machine learning algorithms to anticipate disruptions and proactively adjust system configurations, thereby bolstering robustness against unforeseen challenges. This expansion aims not only to enhance resilience-the ability to recover from failures-but also to deepen the framework’s commitment to sustainability. Researchers intend to incorporate real-time energy consumption monitoring and optimization strategies, alongside dynamic resource allocation, to minimize environmental impact even as system complexity increases. Ultimately, the goal is a self-regulating, adaptive system capable of balancing performance, resilience, and ecological responsibility across a spectrum of dynamic conditions.

The dissertation’s pursuit of balancing resilience and greenness within cyber-physical systems echoes a fundamental principle of efficient design. It prioritizes essential functionality over superfluous complexity, a notion beautifully captured by Tim Bern-Lee: “The web is more a social creation than a technical one.” This highlights the importance of collaborative systems – much like the agent-based policies explored in the research – functioning with minimal overhead to maximize impact. The work doesn’t merely add layers of protection; it sculpts a system where only the necessary components remain, ensuring both robustness and environmental responsibility. The containerization techniques represent a focused effort to deliver precisely what’s needed, embodying a similar philosophy of streamlined functionality.

What Lies Ahead?

The pursuit of ‘green resilience’ in cyber-physical systems, as demonstrated, reduces to a matter of controlled trade-offs. The current work establishes a functional, if limited, approach to mitigating the inherent tension between robust performance and environmental cost. However, the architecture’s reliance on agent-based policies introduces a scalability problem. The computational overhead associated with maintaining and coordinating a large number of agents, each learning and adapting independently, remains an open question-a predictable limitation, given the systemic complexity inherent in distributed systems.

Furthermore, the mitigation of catastrophic forgetting, achieved through containerization, presents a temporary reprieve, not a solution. The accumulation of containers, each representing a past state of learning, introduces a separate, and potentially more insidious, form of entropy. The long-term management of this ‘memory burden’-the energy cost of storage, the latency of retrieval-demands further investigation. Perhaps the true path to resilience lies not in preserving the past, but in developing systems capable of unlearning effectively.

Ultimately, the field must confront a fundamental paradox. Systems designed to withstand disruption, by their very nature, increase their own surface area for failure. The search for perfect resilience is, therefore, a futile exercise. The intelligent design, then, lies in embracing a degree of controlled fragility-in architecting systems that are not merely robust, but adaptively vulnerable. Emotion is a side effect of structure; clarity is compassion for cognition.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16593.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-11-24 03:23