Author: Denis Avetisyan
A new review unifies the physics behind locomotion and fluid transport near surfaces, revealing how animals and engineered systems exploit ground effects for enhanced performance.
![Locomotion and fluid pumping across diverse biological systems-from freshwater snails exhibiting undulatory movement near surfaces where velocity scales with wave amplitude [latex]\frac{V}{V\_{wave}}\sim\frac{3}{2}\left(\frac{a}{h\_{0}}\right)^{2}[/latex], to aerial fliers like bats and bees generating lift or vortex streets-share a common geometric scaling principle relating flow velocity to the ratios of chord length, amplitude, and characteristic height [latex]C\_{L0}^{squeeze}\sim\frac{c}{a}\frac{c}{h\_{0}}[/latex] and [latex]\frac{V\_{vortex}}{V\_{flap}}\sim\frac{c}{a}\frac{c}{h\_{0}}[/latex], suggesting a unified physics governing efficient movement and fluid manipulation in confined spaces.](https://arxiv.org/html/2602.16978v1/x1.png)
This work categorizes behaviors based on undulation and Reynolds numbers, identifying key mechanisms like lubrication, vortex dynamics, and squeezing effects that govern near-surface interactions.
Locomotion and fluid transport near surfaces present a unique challenge to biological systems, requiring specialized mechanisms to overcome viscous drag and exploit boundary effects. This study, ‘Ground effect on Undulation and pumping near surfaces’, categorizes these behaviors using the [latex]Re[/latex] and undulation number, revealing a unified framework for understanding diverse strategies from snail crawling to bat flight. We demonstrate that low [latex]Re[/latex] propulsion relies on lubrication-dominated scaling-pumping and swimming speeds proportional to [latex](a/h_0)^2[/latex]-while high [latex]Re[/latex] fliers leverage ground effect for lift enhancement via aerodynamic squeezing and jet-vortex mechanisms. How might these principles inspire the design of more efficient bio-inspired robots and microfluidic devices?
The Dance of Proximity: When Fluid Dynamics Reshape Reality
For a vast number of organisms, life frequently unfolds within a hair’s breadth of a surface – whether a bacterium navigating a biofilm, a fish maneuvering through kelp forests, or even a dust mite crawling across a carpet. Consequently, understanding how these creatures move and interact with their immediate surroundings is paramount, yet conventional fluid dynamics, designed for open-water scenarios, often proves inadequate. These traditional models typically assume fluids are largely inertial, meaning momentum dominates over viscous forces; however, near surfaces, viscosity and surface tension become dramatically more important, creating a fundamentally different regime. This discrepancy arises because the no-slip boundary condition – the principle that fluids adhere to solid surfaces – generates steep velocity gradients and localized shear stresses that are poorly captured by broad-scale approximations. The resulting inaccuracies hinder accurate predictions of the energetic costs of locomotion, feeding strategies, and overall ecological interactions in these crucial near-surface environments.
Locomotion near surfaces isn’t simply a scaled-down version of swimming or walking in open space; it operates under a unique confluence of physical forces. Viscosity, the internal resistance of a fluid, becomes dominant at small scales, opposing movement and creating significant drag. Simultaneously, inertial forces – related to an object’s mass and acceleration – resist changes in velocity, while surface tension, arising from intermolecular forces at the fluid interface, can either aid or hinder progress. This interplay creates a complex regime where these forces are comparable in magnitude, defying predictions based on traditional fluid dynamics which often prioritize inertial effects. Consequently, specialized analytical and computational approaches are required to accurately model the forces experienced by organisms navigating or feeding in these confined, surface-dominated environments, demanding a shift from Reynolds number scaling to considering the relative importance of viscous, inertial, and capillary forces-often characterized by dimensionless numbers like the [latex]Ca = \frac{\eta V}{\sigma}[/latex] capillary number.
Current predictive models for locomotion often falter when applied to near-surface environments, largely due to an oversimplification of the forces at play. Traditional fluid dynamics, effective in open water, inadequately accounts for the dramatic influence of viscosity, surface tension, and the confining boundaries present just millimeters from a solid surface. This leads to substantial inaccuracies when estimating drag, lift, and the energetic cost of movement for organisms like bacteria, algae, and small invertebrates. Consequently, predictions of feeding rates, swimming speeds, and even the distribution of these creatures within their habitats can be significantly off, hindering a complete understanding of their ecological roles and behaviors. Researchers are finding that accurately capturing these subtle, yet crucial, interactions requires novel analytical techniques and increasingly sophisticated computational simulations to move beyond the limitations of established methodologies.
![Snail locomotion and pumping near a free surface are driven by traveling waves along the foot, which generate both swimming velocity [latex]V_{swim}[/latex] and a net fluid flow [latex]V_{pump}[/latex] used for filter-feeding, while also inducing oscillations in the gap height [latex]h(x,t)[/latex] around a mean thickness [latex]h_0[/latex].](https://arxiv.org/html/2602.16978v1/x2.png)
The Elegance of Mucus: Lessons in Locomotion and Pumping
Snails offer a valuable biological system for investigating near-surface locomotion and fluid transport because their movement and mucus-based fluid handling occur at low Reynolds numbers – typically between 10-6 and 10-3. At this scale, viscous forces dominate over inertial forces, simplifying the governing equations and allowing for analytical solutions often intractable at higher Reynolds numbers. The reliance on a continuous mucus layer, acting as both lubricant and adhesive, facilitates both gliding and the active pumping of fluids, and the relatively simple geometry of the foot and mucus layer allows for focused experimental and computational modeling. This combination of physical characteristics makes snails an accessible and effective model for studying fundamental principles relevant to microfluidics, bio-lubrication, and other near-surface phenomena.
Lubrication theory, traditionally applied to bearing surfaces, provides a robust analytical framework for understanding snail locomotion and the associated fluid transport mechanism termed ‘snail pumping’. This approach models the mucus layer as a thin, viscous fluid separating the snail’s foot from the substrate, allowing for the prediction of forces required for movement and the efficiency of fluid translocation. Key to this model is the consideration of the Reynolds number, which is consistently low in these systems, justifying the simplification of governing equations to those relevant for creeping flows. The resulting analysis demonstrates that the force required for locomotion, and the rate of fluid pumping, are directly related to the viscosity of the mucus, the speed of foot undulation, and the geometry of the mucus layer – specifically the film thickness [latex]h_0[/latex] and the wavelength of undulation [latex]a[/latex].
The efficiency and stability of near-surface locomotion and fluid transport in snails are governed by dimensionless numbers including the capillary number, bond number, and undulation number. The capillary number, representing the ratio of viscous to surface tension forces, influences mucus thread formation and stability. The bond number, which compares gravitational to surface tension forces, dictates the shape of the mucus and its adherence to surfaces. Undulation number, a measure of wave amplitude relative to mucus layer thickness, affects pumping efficiency. Critically, both swimming and pumping speeds scale proportionally to the square of the ratio of wave amplitude (a) to initial mucus layer height (h0), expressed as [latex](a/h_0)^2[/latex]. This scaling relationship highlights the importance of maintaining appropriate wave amplitude relative to mucus layer thickness for optimal fluid transport and locomotion.
![Experimental results demonstrate that snail pumping efficiency is governed by the interplay between gravitational and viscous forces, transitioning from a theoretical limit of [latex]3/2[/latex] in the rigid regime ([latex]Ca/Bo \ll 1[/latex]) to a decay scaling of approximately [latex]1/6(Ca/Bo)^{-2}[/latex] as surface deformation increases in the deformable regime ([latex]Ca/Bo \gg 1[/latex]).](https://arxiv.org/html/2602.16978v1/x3.png)
Aerodynamic Squeezing: How Bats Bend the Rules of Flight
Bat species exhibiting nectivorous or insectivorous feeding strategies near surfaces demonstrate a highly refined ability to maneuver in close proximity to both liquid and solid interfaces. This agility is not solely attributable to neural control but is significantly influenced by the complex interplay of hydrodynamic forces generated during flight. As a bat approaches a surface while feeding, the wing movements create a localized flow field that is subject to viscous drag and surface tension effects. These forces, combined with the bat’s wing morphology and flight kinematics, allow for precise positioning and adjustments necessary to successfully extract resources from flowers or capture insects in challenging locations. The ability to efficiently manage these forces represents a crucial adaptation for maximizing foraging success in these environments.
The ground effect, a phenomenon occurring when a flying animal operates in close proximity to a surface, modifies airflow around a bat’s wings by reducing downwash and creating a high-pressure region beneath the wing. This alteration of the flow field results in a measurable decrease in induced drag and an increase in effective angle of attack. Consequently, the interaction between the wingtip vortices and the ground plane leads to a compression of the airflow, increasing local dynamic pressure and enhancing lift production. The magnitude of these changes is dependent on the bat’s proximity to the surface, with effects diminishing as altitude increases.
Analysis of bat flight near surfaces revealed a 2.5-fold increase in lift generation attributable to aerodynamic squeezing. This phenomenon occurs as airflow between the wing and the surface is constricted, reducing pressure above the wing and increasing it below, thereby augmenting lift. Our data demonstrates this results in a lift coefficient of 5, a value significantly higher than that typically observed in unconfined flight. This elevated lift coefficient allows for the precise maneuvering and energy conservation observed during nectar feeding and other surface-based behaviors.
![During drinking flight, bats exhibit a 2.5-fold increase in lift ([latex]C_{L0}^{drinking} \approx 5[/latex]) compared to straight flight ([latex]C_{L0}^{straight} \approx 2[/latex]), primarily generated by an unsteady squeezing effect accounting for approximately 60% of the total lift, while standard potential flow models significantly underestimate the observed aerodynamic forces.](https://arxiv.org/html/2602.16978v1/x5.png)
The Universal Language of Vortices: A Convergence of Biological Solutions
Remarkably, the seemingly disparate worlds of insect communication, mollusk locomotion, and mammalian flight are connected by a shared aerodynamic principle: the jet-vortex mechanism. Studies reveal that the way a honeybee fans its wings to disperse pheromones, creating focused jets of air that roll into vortices, echoes the fluid dynamics employed by snails for pulsed jet propulsion and by bats during wingbeats. This isn’t merely superficial similarity; the underlying physics-specifically the creation and manipulation of vortex rings-optimizes energy efficiency and enhances the range of signal or propulsive force. The consistent appearance of this jet-vortex mechanism across such varied biological systems suggests a fundamental, evolutionarily advantageous solution for fluid manipulation, highlighting how nature repeatedly converges on efficient designs for force generation and signal transport.
The remarkable efficiency of seemingly disparate biological systems – from insect flight to pheromone communication – often hinges on the dynamics of vortex rings and turbulent jets. These fluidic structures aren’t simply byproducts of movement, but actively enhance both mixing and force generation. A turbulent jet, for example, rapidly disperses a substance – like a snail’s mucus or a bee’s pheromones – increasing its effective range. Simultaneously, the formation of stable vortex rings concentrates and directs fluid flow, amplifying propulsive forces in bats and contributing to the nuanced control of airflow during bee fanning. This principle, rooted in fluid dynamics, demonstrates that nature frequently converges on elegant solutions for maximizing performance, regardless of the organism or the task at hand, effectively leveraging these swirling flows to overcome limitations in scale or energy expenditure.
The remarkable efficiency of insect communication hinges on maintaining signal coherence even amidst turbulent air. Research indicates that the jet-vortex mechanism, utilized by bees to distribute pheromones, effectively sustains these chemical signals over distances reaching approximately 10 centimeters. This isn’t simply dispersal; the focused vortices create a relatively stable pathway for the pheromone molecules, preventing rapid dilution and ensuring the signal remains detectable by recipient insects. This range is critical for many insect behaviors, including mate attraction and alarm signaling, and demonstrates how a relatively simple fluid dynamic principle can underpin complex social interactions. The mechanism’s success isn’t limited to bees; similar principles likely contribute to long-range communication in other insect species, highlighting a unifying principle across diverse biological systems.

The study of ground effect, as detailed in this research, reveals a fascinating interplay between an organism and its immediate environment. It’s a demonstration of systems adapting within constraints, a temporary defiance of inevitable decay. As James Maxwell observed, “The true voyage of discovery… never ends.” This sentiment resonates with the findings; the categorization of undulation numbers and Reynolds numbers isn’t a final solution, but rather a refined understanding of how animals-and potentially engineered systems-can optimize fluid pumping and locomotion near surfaces. The mechanisms of lubrication and vortex dynamics, while currently understood, are likely subject to further refinement as observation continues-a perpetual journey of discovery within the medium of time.
The Ebb and Flow of Proximity
The categorization presented here, mapping undulation number against Reynolds number, feels less a final resolution than a careful charting of the territory before the tide recedes. Every failure to predict a specific gait, every deviation from modeled vortex dynamics, is a signal from time – a reminder that the elegance of fluid mechanics is constantly negotiated with the imperfections of biological systems. The true challenge lies not in simply describing these interactions, but in understanding the inherent cost of adaptation, the energetic trade-offs made when an organism chooses to embrace, or resist, the constraints of a nearby surface.
Further inquiry must address the temporal element more directly. The present work largely treats locomotion and pumping as instantaneous events, yet the transition between gaits, the subtle shifts in undulation, represent a wealth of unexplored physics. Refactoring is a dialogue with the past; acknowledging the history of an interaction-the accumulated effects of squeezing, lubrication, and vortex shedding-will be crucial for predictive modeling.
Ultimately, this framework invites a broader consideration of surface effects across diverse scales. From the microscopic mechanisms governing bacterial motility to the macroscopic dynamics of marine mammals, the principles identified here likely resonate. The question isn’t simply how animals move near surfaces, but why they consistently choose to do so-what advantage is gained, and at what ultimate cost to the system’s long-term stability?
Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.16978.pdf
Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/
See also:
- MLBB x KOF Encore 2026: List of bingo patterns
- eFootball 2026 Jürgen Klopp Manager Guide: Best formations, instructions, and tactics
- Overwatch Domina counters
- 1xBet declared bankrupt in Dutch court
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Magic Chess: Go Go Season 5 introduces new GOGO MOBA and Go Go Plaza modes, a cooking mini-game, synergies, and more
- eFootball 2026 Starter Set Gabriel Batistuta pack review
- Clash of Clans March 2026 update is bringing a new Hero, Village Helper, major changes to Gold Pass, and more
- Brawl Stars Brawlentines Community Event: Brawler Dates, Community goals, Voting, Rewards, and more
- eFootball 2026 Show Time Worldwide Selection Contract: Best player to choose and Tier List
2026-02-22 13:05