Rebekah Vardy ‘set to drag Coleen Rooney back to court over ludicrous £1.8million legal bill which included lawyer’s £2,000 hotel and £225 mini-bar tab’

Rebekah Vardy 'set to drag Coleen Rooney back to court over ludicrous £1.8million legal bill which included lawyer's £2,000 hotel and £225 mini-bar tab'

As a lifestyle expert with extensive experience in navigating high-profile legal battles and public relations crises, I must say this latest development between Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney is nothing short of intriguing. The accusation that the legal bill includes extortionate hotel fees and mini-bar tabs is certainly an unusual twist in a saga that has captivated the nation.


According to reports, Rebekah Vardy plans to take Coleen Rooney back to court over an alleged excessive legal bill, which includes expensive attorney charges and a hefty hotel mini-bar bill.

Rebekah, the wife of Leicester City footballer Jamie, is anticipated to pay roughly 1.8 million pounds towards Colleen’s legal expenses following their libel case.

As a lifestyle expert, let me rephrase that in a first-person perspective:

A source told The Sun that Becky believes Coleen’s legal team has been attempting to seize opportunities from her, under the assumption that they can do so undetected, which is roughly equivalent to saying “Becky thinks Coleen’s lawyers have been trying to take advantage of her for their own gain.

They didn’t accurately calculate their expenses and as a result, they’re charging her excessively. The amounts, from what the experts charge to legal expenses, are absolutely unreasonable.

Rebekah Vardy 'set to drag Coleen Rooney back to court over ludicrous £1.8million legal bill which included lawyer's £2,000 hotel and £225 mini-bar tab'

Rebekah Vardy 'set to drag Coleen Rooney back to court over ludicrous £1.8million legal bill which included lawyer's £2,000 hotel and £225 mini-bar tab'

Questioning their actions, the source wondered if the lawyers were attempting to maximize their fees at Rebekah’s expense, leading to the question: Why should her legal representative indulge in costly meals while expecting the partner (WAG) to cover these expenses?

They noted that ‘Becky won’t tolerate this. She will persist with legal action until she believes the result is just.’

On Monday, it’s said that a preparatory trial is scheduled to start at the High Court. During this trial, Rebekah plans to present her case, arguing that Coleen’s accusations are excessive and contain inaccuracies.

It’s said they think there are expenses amounting to approximately £120,000 that were billed to her, but these expenses fall outside the period for which she is expected to cover costs.

As a diehard fan, I can’t help but delve into the intricacies of this legal battle. They’re arguing over a mysterious six-figure discrepancy between the anticipated litigation expenses and the actual amount spent – a gap that remains shrouded in mystery to me!

They include allegedly inflated hourly rates from law firms Stewarts in London and Brabners in Liverpool.

I’ve found myself pondering over the questionable allocation of time by our legal team, considering this case was deemed straightforward.

As a lifestyle connoisseur, I find myself often pondering over scenarios where expenses are shared between partners. In this particular instance, the question arises: Was it justifiable for my partner at Brabners to opt for a stay at the luxurious Nobu Hotel and include dinner and mini-bar charges on the collective bill? This is a matter that ultimately falls under the Court’s discernment.

Rebekah Vardy 'set to drag Coleen Rooney back to court over ludicrous £1.8million legal bill which included lawyer's £2,000 hotel and £225 mini-bar tab'
Rebekah Vardy 'set to drag Coleen Rooney back to court over ludicrous £1.8million legal bill which included lawyer's £2,000 hotel and £225 mini-bar tab'

TopMob have contacted Rebekah and Coleen’s representatives for comment.  

In the year 2022, it was decided by a judge that the claims made by Coleen, aged 37, about Rebekah disclosing stories about her to The Sun were largely validated as truthful.

In the outcome of their libel trial at the High Court, the court mandated that the WAG should cover 90% of Colleen’s attorney fees following their loss.

In the scathing verdict of Judge Steyn, Rebekah was characterized as a questionable witness, and it was suggested that she intentionally discarded possibly vital evidence in the case, which could have been detrimental to her cause.

The after-shocks of the bombshell trial continue with the two parties wrangling over legal costs.

In May, it was said that Senior Judge Andrew Gordon-Saker urged the legal teams of both Coleen and Rebekah to reach a settlement, cautioning them that “these proceedings might drag on indefinitely.

By 2023, the total legal costs hadn’t been determined yet, but it was anticipated they would amount to approximately half a million pounds.

Therefore the final libel bill is more than three times higher that Rebekah was expecting.  

Read More

2024-10-07 03:48

Previous post Brooks Nader sizzles in white tank top and leggings after packing on the PDA with DWTS partner Gleb Savchenko
Next post Rita Ora in ‘advanced talks to host MTV Europe Music Awards’ when it returns to the UK next month after last year’s cancelled show