Oscar Isaac Accuses Disney of Succumbing to ‘Fascism’ Over Jimmy Kimmel Controversy

by

Hollywood continues to be very vocal about politics. In a recent interview with GQ, actor Oscar Isaac stated he would only return to work with Disney if the company actively resists what he calls “fascism.” This comment seems connected to Disney’s decision to temporarily remove late-night host Jimmy Kimmel after he shared inaccurate information regarding an incident involving Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA.

After Disney temporarily took Jimmy Kimmel Live off the air, Oscar Isaac was asked about the possibility of returning to the ‘Star Wars’ franchise.

I’d consider it, though I’m hesitant about working with Disney at the moment. If they can address some concerning issues and avoid leaning into extremist ideologies, I’d be more willing.

— Cosmic Marvel (@cosmic_marvel) November 10, 2025

So, Oscar Isaac has addressed the possibility of returning to the Star Wars universe, and it’s… complicated. He told GQ (as reported by Variety) that he’s not actively avoiding a return, but he’s definitely hesitant about working with Disney right now. His biggest concern? He wants to see them move away from what he described as ‘fascism’ in their approach. Basically, if Disney can change its ways, he’d be willing to talk about revisiting that galaxy far, far away – or even other projects. It’s a pretty strong statement, and it sounds like creative freedom and company direction are big factors for him.

Just weeks after Disney’s ABC network temporarily took Jimmy Kimmel Live! off the air due to comments made by Kimmel suggesting political reasons behind Kirk’s death, Isaac has spoken out.

During his show on September 15th, Jimmy Kimmel discussed how supporters of Donald Trump, often called the “MAGA gang,” were attempting to distance themselves from a young man who allegedly tried to harm Charlie Kirk.

The statement quickly faced strong backlash for being untrue and hurtful, especially because the investigation was ongoing and evidence proving it wrong had already surfaced. While some called it simply a mistake, commentators like Megyn Kelly argued it was a deliberate attempt to mislead.

Disney-owned ABC quickly pulled the show from the air for less than a week.

When Jimmy Kimmel returned to his show on September 23rd, he spoke about the recent criticism he’d received, but he didn’t offer a direct apology. He stated he never meant to downplay the tragic murder of a young man, carefully avoiding using words like “sorry” or “apologize.”

Even though it was clear Disney took action against an employee for making a false and serious statement about a well-known murder case, some in Hollywood have tried to portray the situation as a matter of free speech. Those defending Jimmy Kimmel argued his suspension was politically driven, claiming pressure from conservatives and the Trump administration were to blame.

Jimmy Kimmel and his wife recently confessed they weren’t truthful with their kids about why the show was temporarily paused, telling them it was all because of Donald Trump.

These latest Oscar Isaac comments toward Disney echo that talking point almost word-for-word.

It’s become common to see Hollywood figures accused of wrongdoing label any resulting criticism or consequences as “fascism.” Instead of taking responsibility for their actions, they often use this claim to portray legitimate consequences – whether from their companies or the public – as unfair political attacks.

Oscar Isaac, known for playing Poe Dameron in the recent Star Wars films (2015-2019), hadn’t given a clear answer about whether he’d reprise the role. He previously made light of the possibility, saying he’d only return if he needed money for a new house. Now, his comments suggest his decision would depend on more than just financial reasons, adding a new layer to his previous joking response.

It’s unknown if Disney or Lucasfilm will officially address Oscar Isaac’s statements, but this situation highlights a recurring pattern of celebrities taking public stances that conflict with the studios’ desire to avoid controversy. Isaac presented his comments as a matter of principle, but essentially, he echoed a common Hollywood response: labeling something as “fascism” when friends or colleagues are held accountable for their actions.

If this is considered real hardship in Hollywood, then the situation isn’t a dramatic fightback – it’s just a bit ridiculous.

Read More

2025-11-10 21:57