Michael Douglas refutes Sharon Stone’s claim they had blazing row before erotic thriller Basic Instinct

by

Michael Douglas disputes the allegations put forward by Sharon Stone, stating there was no heated argument between them before collaborating in the 1992 erotic suspense film, Basic Instinct.

According to Sharon, she and Michael had a disagreement about one of her friends during an interview with Business Insider, which is said to have caused him to decline a screen test together for the film “Basic Instinct.

The actress, who is 67 years old, claimed that Michael had a loud outburst during their dispute, but they eventually resolved their differences and are currently on friendly terms with each other.

However, Michael, who is 80 years old, doesn’t recall events as vividly as before. The representative of the star has stated that he cannot recollect having any argument within that specified period.

Michael’s representative, Allen Burry, stated through a obtained-by-People report, that the actor was taken aback by Sharon’s statements as he doesn’t recall having any disagreement during that period.

As Michael remembers it, he only recalls having high praise for Sharon when they first met.  

Allen stated that it wasn’t until he watched Paul Verhoeven’s audition tape of Sharon, which was for ‘Basic Instinct’, when he first encountered her, that he exclaimed, “Definitely, she’s the perfect choice.

As a devoted follower, I affirm that Michael indeed met Sharon during our visit to Cannes. However, it was later on, specifically when we were promoting “Basic Instinct” in 1992, that their presence at the French film festival occurred.

‘And by the time they’d done the movie, they were friends’, he said. 

DailyMail.com reached out to Michael for his response, but we have yet to receive a reply.

In her conversation with Business Insider, Sharon shared that her relationship with Michael initially faced some challenges.

The actress shared details of the reported disagreement while discussing her persistence in obtaining the role from Basic Instinct, a part that she claimed was rejected by everyone who was contacted.

She mentioned, ‘Everyone refused it, as she put it. However, Michael Douglas wasn’t keen on exposing himself unguardedly in front of an unknown cast member, which I could appreciate. He wouldn’t even rehearse with me, but there was another factor at play: We had a disagreement before that incident.’

Sharon asserted that the argument originated due to a close acquaintance whom Michael had been talking about earlier, prompting her to intervene and stand up for this individual.

But things allegedly got heated, and Sharon suggested they ‘step outside’ to resolve the dispute. 

In Cannes, we were all gathered together, when he began discussing someone and their children. I was quite familiar with the person he mentioned, so I interjected, which led him to ask, “What gives you the right to know?” This conversation revolved around father-child relationships, and it’s clear that his remark touched a nerve.

‘He yelled something at me in front of everyone. I’m not the type who would say, “Pardon me, star.” Instead, I moved my chair back and told him, “Let’s take this outside.” That was our initial encounter.’

After stepping outside to hash things out, Sharon said they resolved the issue ‘amicably.’ 

In simpler terms, she said that she shared her knowledge about the family he was discussing, as I was close friends with the children and their parent. Afterward, we went our separate ways, although not necessarily as best friends, but on friendly terms. Later, when it came to casting “Basic Instinct,” I believe he didn’t want me to be his co-star. She ended this with a laugh.

Sharon said the tension was actually beneficial for their roles. 

She shared that it functioned exceptionally well since I remained calm even when he would get angry with me. This was intriguing for her character because Michael is known to have a quick temper, but she didn’t let it bother her. It turned out to be beneficial in our relationship. In the end, we grew to be the closest of friends, and that continues till today. She has immense respect for him.

In 1992, I found myself immersed in the captivating world of “Basic Instinct,” a gripping crime drama. As a detective, I was tasked with investigating the chilling murder of Johnny Boz, played by Bill Cable. The film kept me on the edge of my seat as I delved into the intricate web of deception and suspense that characterized this iconic production.

In the thrilling narrative I’m immersed in, I, as a diligent observer, find myself tracking a gripping tale where the lead character is a seasoned detective. This detective’s keen instincts lead him to cast a scrutinizing eye on none other than Catherine Tramell, the girlfriend of the victim.

Catherine manages to seduce Nick into falling in love with her.

Basic Instinct features a well-known scene where Catherine is being quizzed by police.

In the midst of the whirlwind of inquiries, I subtly divert their attention by readjusting my crossed and uncrossed legs. This small gesture often leaves gentlemen momentarily disarmed, particularly when they find me bare underneath my attire.

Previously, Sharon remarked that the famous and contentious interrogation scene appears quite “ordinary” when contrasted with today’s explicit movies.

At the enchanting Taormina Film Festival, I found myself starstruck, standing before the radiant Sharon. As she spoke to Deadline, her words resonated with me like a heartfelt melody – a scene once deemed X-rated in its time would now barely raise an eyebrow, having lost its shock value.

She said:'[at the time] it seemed like a scandal, and now it seems very, very ordinary.

It seems that as women increasingly become involved in various aspects of filmmaking such as writing, directing, producing, and filming, movies are moving away from being primarily about male authors’ imaginings of how women should be portrayed.

Actresses are increasingly being given roles that don’t solely cater to male fantasies, thereby reducing the need for critics to evaluate whether those portrayals meet such expectations. Instead, the focus is shifting towards examining if these performances capture the essence of the human experience as a whole.

Read More

2025-08-04 22:34