Matthew Dowd Blames “Right Wing Media Mob” for MSNBC Firing Over Charlie Kirk Comments

by

After parting ways with political analyst Matthew Dowd due to his controversial remarks about the Charlie Kirk incident, he is now expressing his criticism towards those he believes are responsible for the situation.

In the aftermath of his contentious comments made following the sad murder of Charlie Kirk in Utah, the long-standing commentator was let go. Dowd maintains that he has been unfairly treated, asserting that his dismissal wasn’t primarily due to what he said but rather what he perceives as the undue influence of a vocal conservative media group.

What Dowd Said on Air

The debate started on September 10th, with MSNBC host Katy Tur inviting analyst Dowd to discuss a developing incident at Utah Valley University. At that point, information about the shooting was still emerging. Rather than expressing sympathy for the seriousness of the situation, Dowd publicly speculated live on air that Kirk might be one of the most divisive younger figures, often promoting hate speech or targeting specific groups.

Dowd then offered a broader take.

🔊 UPDATE: Matthew Dowd has been dismissed by MSNBC following his controversial remarks, suggesting that Charlie Kirk was responsible for his own assassination, according to Variety.

Good riddance, loser!

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 11, 2025

As a cinephile, I’ve often found myself reflecting on this: “My mind tends to revisit negative emotions, which then manifest into harsh words. I believe this is the cinematic landscape we’re immersed in… It’s impossible to harbor such repugnant thoughts and then utter those harsh words without anticipating that nasty actions will follow.

While details were still unfolding, he hinted that the event might not necessarily be a deliberate assault. Instead, it could be possible that the gunfire was more of a celebration and Kirk may not have been intentionally targeted.

Immediately, the comments ignited strong criticism online, particularly from conservative groups who alleged that Dowd was attempting to pin Kirk’s murder on him.

MSNBC Cuts Ties Immediately

Shortly after the incident, Rebecca Kutler, MSNBC’s president, released a statement labeling Dowd’s remarks as “inadequate, tactless, and unsuitable.” Swiftly, the network verified that he had been terminated from his position.

Rebecca Kutler, president of MSNBC, has expressed that during our live coverage of the shooting incident involving Charlie Kirk, Matthew Dowd made remarks that were disrespectful, insensitive, and not in line with our standards. We sincerely apologize for these comments, which Matthew Dowd himself also regrets. At MSNBC, we unequivocally condemn any form of violence.

— MSNBC Public Relations (@MSNBCPR) September 10, 2025

Leadership at Comcast issued a company-wide message emphasizing the significance of respectful communication. Signed by Brian Roberts, Mike Cavanagh, and Mark Lazarus, the memo expressed concern that “a fundamental part of our societal dialogue has become strained,” and encouraged employees to strive for improvement in their interactions.

It was a not-so-subtle rebuke of Dowd’s performance.

Dowd’s Counterattack

From the outside perspective, Dowd utilized his Substack and other outlets to provide both clarification and resistance. He contended that when he spoke, the facts were still unverified, and he never meant to imply that Kirk should be subjected to harm. He admitted that perhaps his tone was misconstrued, but he asserts that he has been unjustly slandered.

Most notably, Dowd pinned the blame on what he labeled the “right wing media mob.”

He indicates that traditional media outlets took his remarks, stirred up public anger, and put pressure on MSNBC to end his employment contract.

Dowd stated, “They contrived the entire situation.” In response, MSNBC took action due to the volatile crowd. Despite feeling disheartened, Dowd intends to keep speaking out through other platforms.

The Bigger Picture

This event touches upon several sensitive topics simultaneously. It underscores the delicate balance that media outlets and commentators must maintain when addressing sudden catastrophes. The public often demands immediate insights, yet making even minor speculations or inappropriate comments can ignite heated debates.

The statement can be rephrased as: Next, it sparks debates about cancel culture and aggressive protest movements. Supporters of Dowd claim he suffered consequences for delivering an insensitive analysis regarding how language contributes to violence. However, critics argue his timing was thoughtless and heartless, essentially assigning blame to the victim before their family had a chance to mourn.

Ultimately, this situation clearly illustrates the extreme division that now characterizes our media landscape. To conservative viewers, it appears that the commentators on MSNBC lack even a minimal level of civility when addressing political adversaries.

Conclusion

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s tragic death, Matthew Dowd’s remarks were perceived by many as insensitive and potentially defamatory. However, it appears that Dowd was trying to make a broader point about harmful discourse. Now, he is attributing his recent struggles to a supposed orchestrated smear campaign from the right-wing side.

Regarding him, opinions vary whether he’s a victim of public backlash or the master of his own downfall, depending on which part of America’s media spectrum people belong to. However, it’s undeniable that a single misplaced remark in today’s sensitive environment can lead to career termination, and this seems to have been the case with Dowd.

Read More

2025-09-12 23:57