As a follower of the entertainment industry and a fan of Kevin Hart, I find it disappointing to learn about the recent lawsuit filed against him by his former friend, Jonathan “J.T.” Jackson. The allegations of breach of contract, fraud, and emotional distress are serious and could potentially tarnish Hart’s reputation if proven true.
A lawsuit has been filed against Kevin Hart, claiming he mishandled a past settlement agreement concerning his ex-friend, Jonathan “J.T.” Jackson, and the infamous sex tape scandal involving Hart’s alleged infidelity.
In a court case initiated on Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Jackson claimed that Hart violated the intricately worked-out terms of their 2021 settlement during an Instagram post he made that year, leading to a $12-million lawsuit for breach of contract. The civil complaint, which includes Hart, Hartbeat LLC, and several unidentified parties among the defendants, additionally alleges deceit and deliberate emotional distress.
Based on my understanding of the text, it seems that Hart, a Navy veteran, professional bowler, and actor, found himself embroiled in a scandal that led to legal issues. According to the 23-page complaint I recently came across, Hart was legally bound by the July 2021 settlement to use particular language that would publicly clear his name. As someone who has had no personal involvement with this situation, it’s challenging for me to fully grasp the impact of these legal requirements on Hart’s life. However, I can imagine how essential it must have been for him to regain his reputation and move forward. The use of the term “publicly exonerate” implies that Hart’s name had been tarnished in some way, and the settlement’s stipulation for specific language suggests a high level of scrutiny and potential long-term consequences. Regardless, it’s clear that this was an important aspect of the settlement agreement, and I hope that its fulfillment allowed Hart to focus on his career and personal growth once again.
“The specific language of Hart’s statement, carefully crafted during contract talks, was vital for rectifying and healing the significant harm done to Plaintiff’s reputation due to Hart’s unwarranted extortion accusations that he widely spread,” according to the lawsuit.
In January 2018, investigators from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office raided Jackson’s home at gunpoint, aged 47, over allegations of extortion that he believes were instigated by Hart. However, these charges were later dismissed by prosecutors whom Jackson also sued in December. In his statement, Jackson expressed concern over the harm done to his reputation due to a string of deceitful acts by Hart and Hartbeat, such as the release of their 2019 Netflix docuseries “Don’t F— This Up.”
The docuseries accused Jackson and Hart of creating and sharing a sex tape filmed in a Las Vegas hotel room with a woman who wasn’t Hart’s wife. Hart and Jackson were subsequently sued for $60 million by the woman, Montia Sabbag, but that lawsuit was dropped. Jackson was exonerated of all related accusations.
In the recently filed lawsuit, it is claimed that Jackson didn’t receive any financial compensation from his settlement agreement with Hart. Instead, he viewed their deal as a necessary step to clear his name, rather than a means for monetary gain. The language Hart planned to use in his public statement was vital for Jackson’s vindication, and Jackson entered into this contract under the belief that it would ultimately repair his reputation and enable him to continue his career with honor.
According to Jackson’s account, Hart reportedly consented in writing to actively work towards having all criminal charges against Jackson dropped and made a public declaration clearing his name. Hart was supposed to declare that the charges against Jackson had been dismissed, that Jackson was completely innocent of any involvement in an extortion scheme, and that the situation had severely damaged their friendship.
The complaint added that Hart was supposed to declare, “I’ve lost someone dear to me whom I hold a deep love for, and I’m proud to announce that all accusations against JT Jackson have been dropped. He is not guilty and had no involvement in this matter. This heavy burden on me and my family that we once struggled with has now been resolved.”
Hart’s Instagram video on Oct. 27, 2021, openly violated their prior understanding and manipulated the situation’s portrayal, according to the lawsuit. However, Hart later announced that “J.T. Jackson has been cleared of any wrongdoing in the recent charges against him,” enabling him to discuss the matter publicly for the first time. Hart lamented the loss of their friendship as a result of the legal proceedings and expressed his relief that the ordeal had come to an end. He failed to acknowledge Jackson’s innocence in the incident.
According to Daniel L. Reback, Jackson’s lawyer, Hart’s declaration deviated noticeably from the prearranged language in key areas. To begin with, Hart was supposed to assert that “all charges against Jackson have been dropped, and he is not guilty and had no role in it.” However, Hart’s actual statement failed to include an explicit statement of Jackson’s innocence or absence of involvement. Additionally, the agreement required Hart to acknowledge the significant impact of the legal matter on the termination of a valuable friendship. Instead, Hart’s statement focused solely on his own progression and did not directly address the personal and professional consequences for Jackson as outlined in the contract.
Along with the requested $12 million, Jackson aims to receive punitive damages, trial costs and attorney fees, injunctions for his exoneration, and the deletion of defamatory statements regarding him from “Don’t F— This Up.”
According to Reback’s comment to The Times, “The evidence in the lawsuit clearly tells its own story. We are optimistic that Mr. Jackson will emerge as the undisputed winner and have his reputation cleared.”
A spokesperson for Hart was not available Wednesday to respond to The Times’ request for comment.
Over the past few years, Hart has openly addressed the infamous “sex-tape saga” in various public statements. Notably, during this period, his wife Eniko Parrish was pregnant with their first child. Reports surfaced of an attempt by an unnamed woman to extort Hart using a video containing sexually explicit material. In response, Hart issued an apology to Parrish through an Instagram post in September 2017.
He acknowledged in the video’s caption that he needed to improve and would do so. He has never pretended to be flawless. However, several months later, he admitted to his infidelity on “The Breakfast Club” in December 2017, expressing deep regret for his irresponsible actions.
“He admitted, ‘That’s Kevin Hart at his most foolish.’ That wasn’t one of my best moments. But as they say, actions have consequences – once you’ve made a mistake, you must face the repercussions. You can’t go back and ponder what you were thinking because, at that time, you weren’t thinking at all.”
Times staff writer Alexandra Del Rosario contributed to this report.
Read More
- Clash Royale Best Boss Bandit Champion decks
- Mobile Legends November 2025 Leaks: Upcoming new heroes, skins, events and more
- The John Wick spinoff ‘Ballerina’ slays with style, but its dialogue has two left feet
- Delta Force Best Settings and Sensitivity Guide
- Stocks stay snoozy as Moody’s drops U.S. credit—guess we’re all just waiting for the crash
- Bentley Delivers Largest Fleet of Bespoke Flying Spurs to Galaxy Macau
- Kingdom Rush Battles Tower Tier List
- Steve McQueen on making WWII personal with ‘Blitz’: ‘It’s about us fighting ourselves’
- ‘Australia’s Most Sexually Active Woman’ Annie Knight reveals her shock plans for the future – after being hospitalised for sleeping with 583 men in a single day
- Clash of Clans: How to beat the Fully Staffed Challenge
2024-07-18 21:44