Keeping Humanoid Robots Steady Under Pressure

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new control framework empowers robots to maintain balance and precision even when subjected to strong external forces and challenging interactions.

Humanoid robotics research demonstrates a capacity for adaptable locomotion and manipulation under varied constraints, as evidenced by successful navigation with sandbag loads, one-handed box carrying, transitions from lifted positions, bimanual flower pot transport, suspended policy deployment, complex dance movements, and even the performance of tasks like window cleaning while suspended-all indicative of a system that prioritizes maintaining dynamic stability rather than resisting the inevitable effects of external forces.
Humanoid robotics research demonstrates a capacity for adaptable locomotion and manipulation under varied constraints, as evidenced by successful navigation with sandbag loads, one-handed box carrying, transitions from lifted positions, bimanual flower pot transport, suspended policy deployment, complex dance movements, and even the performance of tasks like window cleaning while suspended-all indicative of a system that prioritizes maintaining dynamic stability rather than resisting the inevitable effects of external forces.

This work introduces HAFO, a force-adaptive control system utilizing a dual-agent reinforcement learning approach and dynamic modeling for robust humanoid robot control in loco-manipulation tasks with intense external disturbances.

Despite advances in humanoid robotics, robust and precise motion under significant external forces remains a key challenge. This paper introduces HAFO-Humanoid Force-Adaptive Control for Intense External Force Interaction Environments-a novel dual-agent reinforcement learning framework designed to address this limitation. By explicitly modeling external disturbances and employing an asymmetric Actor-Critic architecture, HAFO enables stable loco-manipulation even under strong loads and rope tension. Could this approach unlock more adaptable and resilient humanoid robots capable of operating reliably in complex, real-world scenarios?

The Inevitable Dance: Navigating Complexity in Humanoid Control

Humanoid robots, despite significant advancements, consistently encounter difficulties when navigating and interacting with real-world settings. Unlike the controlled conditions of research labs, everyday environments present unpredictable terrain, dynamic obstacles, and a constant stream of disturbances – a bumped table leg, a shifting rug, or uneven ground. These complexities demand a level of adaptability and robustness that current locomotion and manipulation systems often lack. Maintaining balance during walking, grasping objects with varying shapes and weights, and responding to unexpected forces require precise coordination and real-time adjustments. The challenge isn’t simply about executing pre-programmed movements, but rather about enabling the robot to perceive its surroundings, anticipate potential issues, and proactively modify its actions to maintain stability and achieve its goals, effectively bridging the gap between controlled performance and reliable operation in complex, unstructured spaces.

Conventional control strategies for humanoid robots frequently falter when confronted with the inherent unpredictability of real-world interactions. These methods, often reliant on precisely modeled dynamics and pre-programmed responses, struggle to maintain balance and execute tasks effectively when subjected to unexpected pushes, uneven terrain, or variable object weights. Consequently, engineers typically devote substantial effort to manual tuning – painstakingly adjusting numerous control parameters through trial and error to achieve acceptable performance in specific scenarios. This process is not only time-consuming and expensive but also yields controllers that are brittle and generalize poorly to even slightly different conditions, highlighting a critical limitation in the pursuit of truly robust and adaptable humanoid robots. The need for a more resilient control paradigm is thus driven by the impracticality of anticipating and compensating for every possible external disturbance through purely reactive or pre-programmed means.

The pursuit of truly versatile humanoid robots necessitates a shift away from pre-programmed responses towards systems capable of dynamic adaptation. Current control methodologies frequently falter when confronted with the inherent unpredictability of real-world interactions – an unexpected push, uneven terrain, or a shifting center of gravity can easily disrupt stability. Researchers are therefore exploring approaches rooted in model-predictive control and reinforcement learning, allowing robots to anticipate disturbances, rapidly recalculate optimal actions, and learn robust strategies through trial and error. This involves developing sophisticated sensor fusion techniques to accurately perceive the environment, coupled with algorithms that enable real-time decision-making and precise motor control. Ultimately, the goal is to create robots that don’t just react to change, but proactively maintain balance and execute tasks even amidst external forces and unforeseen circumstances, mirroring the fluid adaptability observed in biological systems.

The hierarchical adaptive force optimization (HAFO) model employs a dual-agent policy-controlling lower-body locomotion with velocity commands and upper-body manipulation with trajectory references-and incorporates dynamic perturbations to achieve robust teleoperated loco-manipulation via precise inverse kinematics.
The hierarchical adaptive force optimization (HAFO) model employs a dual-agent policy-controlling lower-body locomotion with velocity commands and upper-body manipulation with trajectory references-and incorporates dynamic perturbations to achieve robust teleoperated loco-manipulation via precise inverse kinematics.

Decoupling the System: A Dual-Agent Force-Adaptive Framework

HAFO, or the Hybrid Agent Force-Adaptive framework, implements a dual-agent control architecture to independently manage the upper and lower bodies of a robotic system. This decoupling is achieved by designating one agent for upper-body control and a separate agent for lower-body control, each operating with its own observation space, action space, and reward function. This separation allows for specialized control policies tailored to the unique dynamics and requirements of each body segment. Communication between the agents is limited to the exchange of state information, facilitating coordinated movement while maintaining modularity and simplifying the learning process. The framework is designed to enable robots to respond effectively to external disturbances by adapting the control of each body independently, improving overall stability and performance.

HAFO employs reinforcement learning (RL) to train two distinct agents: an upper-body agent and a lower-body agent. These agents are trained independently to react to external disturbances by learning optimal control policies through trial and error within a simulated environment. The RL algorithms utilized focus on maximizing reward signals associated with maintaining balance and minimizing deviation from desired trajectories when subjected to unanticipated forces. This approach allows the robot to dynamically adjust its posture and gait in response to external forces, effectively enhancing stability compared to traditional control methods that rely on pre-defined responses or static stability margins. The trained agents learn to anticipate and counteract forces, improving robustness and enabling adaptation to varying terrains and interaction scenarios.

The HAFO framework integrates a Spring-Damping System and Impedance Control to facilitate compliant interaction with the environment and ensure robust performance under external disturbances. Impedance Control regulates the robot’s dynamic behavior, defining a desired relationship between force and position. The Spring-Damping System, implemented within the Impedance Control scheme, allows the robot to respond elastically to forces, absorbing impacts and maintaining stability. Specifically, desired $stiffness$ and $damping$ parameters are tuned to achieve a desired level of compliance; higher stiffness provides greater resistance to displacement, while increased damping dissipates energy and reduces oscillations. This combination enables the robot to effectively handle unexpected forces and maintain contact during dynamic movements, improving overall robustness and interaction capabilities.

Decoupling upper and lower body control within the HAFO framework facilitates more efficient learning and adaptation to complex force interactions by reducing the dimensionality of the control problem. Traditional monolithic control approaches require simultaneous optimization of both upper and lower body dynamics, increasing computational complexity and sample inefficiency. By independently training agents for each body segment, HAFO allows for focused learning of specific force response strategies. This modularity enables faster convergence during reinforcement learning, as each agent can specialize in managing forces relevant to its respective segment. Consequently, the robot demonstrates improved adaptation to unforeseen external disturbances and complex terrains, as learned policies are transferable and require less retraining when faced with novel force interactions.

An impedance controller, modeled as a spring-damper system on a humanoid robot, demonstrates improved pelvis position control and force regulation compared to a stiffness controller during displacement.
An impedance controller, modeled as a spring-damper system on a humanoid robot, demonstrates improved pelvis position control and force regulation compared to a stiffness controller during displacement.

Accelerated Adaptation: Curriculum Learning and Simulation Fidelity

Curriculum Learning (CL) and Force Curriculum Learning (FCL) are employed to reduce training time for complex robotic locomotion tasks. CL progressively increases the difficulty of training scenarios, starting with simpler tasks and gradually introducing more challenging conditions. FCL extends this by specifically focusing on the force applied by the robot during training; it begins with easy-to-achieve force profiles and incrementally increases the required force exertion. This staged approach allows the reinforcement learning agent to first master basic movements before tackling more demanding scenarios, resulting in a statistically significant reduction in the number of training iterations required to reach a target performance level compared to standard reinforcement learning techniques. The combination of CL and FCL optimizes the learning process by efficiently exploring the state-action space and avoiding premature convergence on suboptimal solutions.

Training data generation and controller validation are performed using the high-fidelity physics simulators Isaac Gym and MuJoCo. These simulators allow for the efficient creation of diverse robotic scenarios and facilitate parallel simulation, significantly reducing training time. MuJoCo provides accurate modeling of robot dynamics and contact physics, while Isaac Gym leverages GPU acceleration for faster computation. Both simulators enable the systematic evaluation of controller performance across a range of simulated environments and conditions, including variations in terrain, object properties, and external disturbances. This simulated validation is critical prior to deployment on physical hardware.

Concurrent training of lower-body and upper-body control systems is implemented to facilitate the development of coordinated, whole-body locomotion and manipulation skills. This approach avoids the limitations of sequential training, where learned lower-body gaits may not integrate effectively with subsequently trained upper-body behaviors. By optimizing both control systems simultaneously, the agent learns to coordinate movements across the entire body, enabling more complex tasks and improving overall performance in dynamic environments. This method promotes the emergence of synergistic behaviors and allows for the efficient exploration of the combined control space, resulting in a more robust and adaptable robotic system.

The AMASS dataset, a large-scale motion capture database of human movements, is leveraged to enhance the realism of simulated upper-body behaviors during robot training. This dataset provides a diverse range of natural human motions which are used as ground truth for generating synthetic training data, specifically for the upper-body controller. By training on data informed by AMASS, the robot learns to exhibit more human-like and coordinated upper-body movements, improving the overall quality of learned behaviors and facilitating more effective transfer to real-world robotic systems. The dataset’s breadth allows for training across a wider variety of poses and actions, improving the robustness and generalization capabilities of the controller.

Toward Robust Autonomy: Generalization and Future Directions

The Hierarchical Adaptive Force Optimization (HAFO) framework exhibits remarkable resilience and adaptability, consistently achieving precise upper-body motion tracking even in challenging scenarios. Recent evaluations demonstrate HAFO’s ability to generalize effectively to unseen environments – a capability known as zero-shot transfer – maintaining a low motion tracking error of just 0.38 while subjects were suspended by ropes. This performance highlights the system’s robust control strategy, enabling accurate and stable movement replication despite external disturbances and novel conditions. The framework’s success in these tests suggests a significant advancement in robotic control, paving the way for more versatile and reliable human-robot interaction in dynamic, real-world applications.

The Hierarchical Adaptive Force Optimization (HAFO) framework is designed with a highly modular architecture, intentionally enabling the seamless incorporation of cutting-edge reinforcement learning methodologies. This flexibility allows researchers to readily experiment with and integrate techniques such as Teacher-Student Distillation, which refines performance through knowledge transfer, and Asymmetric Actor-Critic algorithms, which optimize action selection and value estimation independently. By decoupling core functionalities, HAFO avoids rigid constraints, fostering innovation and accelerating the development of more sophisticated robotic control systems capable of adapting to complex and dynamic environments. This open structure not only enhances the framework’s current capabilities but also positions it as a versatile platform for future advancements in robotic learning and control.

Recent advancements in robotic control have yielded significant improvements in upper-body motion tracking, and the Hierarchical Action Forecasting and Optimization (HAFO) framework demonstrably exceeds the performance of existing methodologies. Rigorous testing under both single and dual hand load conditions revealed that HAFO consistently achieves the lowest upper-body motion tracking error, indicating a heightened ability to accurately predict and replicate human movements. Crucially, this enhanced accuracy is coupled with exceptional action smoothness, minimizing jerky or unnatural robotic responses. This combination of precision and fluidity suggests HAFO is not merely tracking movement, but replicating it in a manner more closely aligned with natural human biomechanics, opening avenues for more intuitive and effective human-robot interaction and collaborative tasks.

The next phase of development for the Hierarchical Adaptive Force Optimization (HAFO) framework centers on seamlessly integrating it with teleoperation systems. This convergence aims to leverage HAFO’s robust motion tracking and force control capabilities to enhance the precision and adaptability of remotely operated robots. Researchers anticipate this integration will not only improve the user experience in teleoperation but also unlock the potential for HAFO to address increasingly complex real-world tasks, such as in-home assistance, disaster response, and advanced manufacturing. Exploration will extend to scenarios demanding intricate manipulation and dynamic adaptation to unforeseen environmental changes, ultimately pushing the boundaries of robotic autonomy and human-robot collaboration in practical applications.

The pursuit of robust control, as demonstrated by HAFO’s force-adaptive framework, echoes a fundamental truth about complex systems. The research highlights the robot’s ability to maintain stability amidst intense external forces-a necessary adaptation for operation in unpredictable environments. Donald Davies observed, “The art of system design is to minimize surprises.” This sentiment aligns perfectly with HAFO’s dual-agent reinforcement learning approach, which proactively anticipates and mitigates disturbances. It isn’t merely about withstanding force, but about learning to age gracefully within it, optimizing for resilience rather than rigid performance. Sometimes, observing the process of adaptation, as the system learns to manage loco-manipulation under load, is more valuable than attempting to eliminate all external influences.

What Lies Ahead?

The pursuit of robust force adaptation in humanoid robotics, as exemplified by HAFO, inevitably reveals the inherent trade-offs in system design. This work establishes a compelling advance, yet each layer of complexity introduced-dual-agent reinforcement learning, explicit dynamics-represents a crystallization of technical debt. The system gains capability now, but the cost will be manifest in future calibration, maintenance, and the inevitable brittleness that arises from tightly coupled components. The question isn’t whether the system will degrade, but how gracefully.

A natural progression lies in addressing the limitations of current simulation-to-reality transfer. The fidelity of even the most sophisticated virtual environments remains a simplification of the physical world, and the resulting discrepancies accumulate during the learning process. Future work might explore methods for continual learning, allowing the robot to refine its control policies through real-world interaction, accepting that perfect pre-training is an asymptotic goal.

Ultimately, the field must acknowledge that complete autonomy in truly unstructured environments demands more than skillful control. It requires a capacity for improvisation, a willingness to accept imperfect solutions, and perhaps even an understanding of when to yield to external forces rather than resist them. The system’s memory-the accumulated effects of past interactions and design choices-will be the defining factor in its longevity.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.20275.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-11-26 17:33