Movies

Jury to View Damning Video of Diddy Assaulting Cassie Ventura

BBG News

Today’s hearing resulted in the judge permitting the jury to watch the video of the disgraced rapper, Cassius, engaging in a physical altercation.

For Diddy, it’s a heavy setback since the alleged security footage showing him physically attacking his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway is seen as incriminating evidence, despite his lawyers claiming that the video may have been manipulated or edited.

Last Friday, Diddy’s legal team encountered a frustrating turn of events during a pretrial hearing when the judge decided to protect the identities of three individuals who have accused him. This decision left his legal team feeling enraged.

The judge, Judge Arun Subramanian, declined their plea for a two-month extension in the well-known sex trafficking case, stating that the request was submitted excessively close to the trial. The jury selection is set for May 5, and opening statements will be made on May 12.

In a courtroom, the elderly Diddy was dressed in a tanned prison outfit consisting of a top and trousers. Upon entering, he affectionately embraced his legal team. Throughout the proceedings, he would sometimes tilt his head in dissent.

Among the two rulings handed down by Judge Subramanian, one that didn’t benefit Diddy was his decision to ensure the confidentiality of sex abuse victims identified as individuals 2, 3, and 4.

Overwhelmed with excitement, I couldn’t contain my emotions as the verdict was announced. My legal team had argued that Victim 3 expressed indifference when asked about her desire for anonymity. In response, I passed a note to my lawyer, Marc Agnifilio, to address the judge on this crucial matter.

Teny Geragos, another of Diddy’s legal representatives, stated that Victim 4 had previously been active in making herself known. Their law firm has received statements from previous Diddy employees expressing disbelief over Victim 4’s allegations.

Geragos said: ‘It’s really concerning for us, this particular person’.

According to Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey, Victim 3 has yet to reveal all the aspects of the mistreatment she experienced at the hands of Diddy, as well as the highly intimate and potentially volatile specifics regarding her ordeal.

The judge instructed Comey to verify whether Victim 3 was still seeking anonymity, and the prosecutor concurred with this request.

On Wednesday, the defense asked for a delay of the trial by two months, given that new charges were added against their client on April 4th by the prosecution. Additionally, Diddy’s attorney, Marc Agnifilo, stated that they require additional time to examine certain emails that they have requested from an alleged victim, in order to prepare a thorough defense.

But the judge denied it first thing once the pretrial hearing kicked off. 

As a committed supporter, I’m thrilled to share that a victory for Diddy’s camp was secured when the judge decreed that Warner Brothers should relinquish the outtakes of interviews with two claimed victims, as portrayed in the Investigation Discovery documentary that debuted on January 27, to the defense.

The legal representative of the media conglomerate, speaking in court, mentioned that they’d require a couple of days to compile the necessary footage.

In the ongoing conflict, I found myself advocating for our cause as Diddy’s legal team contested the prosecution’s proposal to summon a clinical psychologist, who previously testified on behalf of Amber Heard during her trial with Johnny Depp, to serve as an expert witness in their case.

In that court case, Dr. Hughes stated that she had determined Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Heard, following the alleged incidents of abuse inflicted by Depp.

Lawyer Alexandra Shapiro stated that the interpretation given by Dr. Hughes on ‘coercive control’ is extremely vague and has no concrete meaning whatsoever.

Dr. Hughes pointed out that tactics like ‘showering with love,’ also known as ‘love bombing,’ can be strategies employed in exerting controlling behavior, just as expressing affection might be used for the same purpose.

Essentially, Shapiro stated that virtually anything could count, while her testimony was considered so insignificant that it had no value for the jury.

Referencing the Depp vs Heard court case as an example, Shapiro stated that if given the chance to discuss the subject, Dr. Hughes might find it hard to keep from expressing any other thoughts that pop into her mind.

In simpler terms, Judge Arun Subramanian indicated that he’d make his decision at a later time, but it seemed probable that he would restrict Dr. Hughes from discussing coercive control during his testimony.

Towards the close of the court proceedings, Diddy placed a hand over his chest, offering a gesture of affection towards his mother and son Justin who were seated in the viewing area for spectators.

A security guard wearing a black hoodie which said ‘Free Puff’ stood next to them.

Turning my chair around, I settled facing my cherished mother and son, my heart swelling with pride. Giving them a confident thumbs up, I couldn’t help but utter those three precious words, “I adore each and every one of you.

Justin placed a hand over his chest as his father blew him a kiss, gave a wave, and exited through a side doorway.

Diddy’s trial commences on May 5, with the selection of jurors taking place a week prior. The opening statements will be delivered on May 12.

55-year-old Sean Combs (formerly known as Puff Daddy or Diddy) denies the charges against him, which include conspiring in racketeering, engaging in sex trafficking, and facilitating prostitution through transportation.

Given less than three weeks before Diddy’s defense prepares its arguments, it’s understandable that this month court papers were submitted by Diddy’s team, asking his ex-partner, Cassie Ventura, to provide documents related to the memoir she is said to have written about Diddy.

Diddy expresses his hope that the memoir he has written will present a version of events distinct from what she has shared with the government, one that challenges the claims she made about him having raped and abused her for years. However, Ventura’s legal team is refusing to share this memoir, characterizing the subpoena sent by Diddy’s defense on March 19 as a ‘fishing expedition’.

On Thursday, the prosecution filed a motion, disclosing that ‘tangible proof’ amassed from searches of his residences in Miami and Los Angeles last year – such as objects intended for use at sexual gatherings, referred to as ‘Freak Offs’ – might be presented to the jury.

As a die-hard enthusiast, I can’t help but share this intriguing piece of information: It appears that one of the shocking allegations leveled against Diddy involved his rapid consumption of baby oil during intimate moments. Reportedly, he could finish an entire bottle in under five minutes!

In May 2024, over a thousand containers of baby oil and lubricants were confiscated by Homeland Security officers from various locations.

Last year, Ventura filed a startling civil lawsuit against Diddy, accusing him of sexual assault and long-term abuse. A video surfaced on CNN last year, showing him brutally attacking her at a hotel in 2016, which significantly contributed to his decline.

According to court records submitted by Diddy’s legal team, they are requesting access to Ventura’s bank records for a period of ten months, as well as any related documents or drafts pertaining to his memoir.

The partially blacked-out demand additionally requests any personal diaries or journal entries penned by Ventura, who had been in a relationship with Diddy for over ten years and separated from him in 2018.

They argue that she has significant information that could clear her, which they believe she and the prosecutors have been attempting to hide. This includes drafts of her memoirs and other writings that present a version of events distinct from what she’s previously shared with the government and plans to testify about in court.

As a devoted follower, I would express it like this: I, for one, believe that Ventura’s lawyer, Douglas Wigdor, considers the inquiry as ‘an unauthorized search,’ and deems it unsuitable and thus, it ought to be dismissed.

In my own words, I’m sharing that the prosecution supports Wigdor, stating in their response to the initial subpoena that the defendant’s demand for my bank statements was aimed at creating doubt about my financial motivations. Additionally, they argue that the defense’s pursuit of my writings through a subpoena is an entirely inappropriate use of this legal tool.

In this scenario, it’s up to Judge Arun Subramanian to determine if the presented evidence can be admitted.

In their court document submitted on Thursday, prosecutors stated that during the upcoming trial, the jury will be presented with ‘evidence physically obtained from the defendant’s premises – such as weapons, drugs, and paraphernalia related to “Freak Off” events’.

It’s quite possible that a large number, approximately dozens, of baby oil bottles will be presented in court during an emotionally impactful scene, which could strongly appeal to the jurors.

According to those allegedly victimized by Diddy, he is said to have quickly consume an entire bottle of baby oil within five minutes. One individual named ‘Nicole’ shared with Rolling Stone that after being administered two pills which caused her to lose consciousness, she awoke several hours later in a room filled with empty bottles of baby oil, towels, and wine bottles.

Additional pieces of potential evidence that might surface during the trial include a diary penned by a previous employee of Diddy, in addition to text messages exchanged between him and several alleged victims.

As a die-hard fan, I can’t help but feel a twinge of excitement when I hear that the key witnesses against my idol, Diddy, might not be as rock-solid as they seem. It appears his legal team has uncovered some baggage in their backgrounds, and they’re ready to use it to cast doubt on their credibility. The anticipation is killing me!

In simpler terms, the prosecution argues that since information regarding past convictions for DUIs, drug use, illegal sexual activities, tax violations, and a felony charge are not pertinent to the case at hand, Diddy should be prevented from questioning about these matters in court.

Nor should Diddy’s lawyers be allowed to ask about prior domestic violence incidents.

As a lifestyle advisor, I’d put it this way: In some instances, individuals who could potentially provide testimony have past allegations of misconduct on their records – an avenue that Diddy might explore in his defense strategy.

As a lifestyle expert, I’d rephrase it as follows: In relation to the ongoing trial, I should note that there’s mention of a young individual who might either take the stand or be brought up in discussion. This suggests the gravity of the accusations against him, which involve allegations of abuse concerning children – a matter that demands our utmost concern and attention due to its severity.

In a court case, prosecutors have proposed allowing three out of the four key witnesses to remain anonymous during their testimonies. However, Diddy’s legal team has voiced strong opposition to this proposal.

Read More

2025-04-25 19:06

Previous post The Best Superhero Movie of Every Year From 2000 to Today
Next post The Shadow Drop Would Have Been More Fun If I Knew I Could Play The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered