Movies

Candace Owens calls out Blake Lively over claim she’s being subpoenaed into Justin Baldoni legal drama

BBG News

As a lifestyle expert, I find myself in an interesting position today as I address recent allegations that have been leveled against me in the high-profile legal matter involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. To set the record straight, I want to make it clear that I am cooperating fully with the proceedings, but I vehemently deny any suggestion of wrongdoing on my part. I remain committed to upholding the principles I stand for and staying true to my values.

Following Baldoni’s strategic planning following the dismissal of his $400 million lawsuit against Lively, a report surfaced claiming that Owens, aged 35, was instructed to disclose correspondence involving him, Lively, and the Wayfarer parties.

Simultaneously with Owens, who often talks about the legal dispute of It Ends With Us on her podcast, there were reports that media figure Perez Hilton and YouTube content creator Andy Signore were also served subpoenas. This was a result of their comments that stirred controversy about Blake.

In response, Owens refuted Lively’s claims, stated he didn’t receive a subpoena, and surprisingly alleged that her team leaked the story to TMZ.

This way, the sentence is more conversational and easier to understand while maintaining the original meaning.

In her statement to DailyMail.com, she expressed gratitude towards Blake’s team for disclosing the information to TMZ, as she has not been served a subpoena yet and this action helped bring it to her attention.

Certainly, ‘I must admit, I’m unsure about the reason behind the subpoena since I wasn’t acquainted with any of these parties when their lawsuits were initiated. However, keep listening to my podcast, and I’ll share more details as soon as I can!’

representatives for Hilton, Lively, and Baldoni have been reached out to by DailyMail.com for a response, but no comments have been received as of now.

On their lively show, Popcorned Planet’s host Signore asserted that Lively was subtly conceding to Baldoni when she recently withdrew her emotional distress lawsuit.

Recently, Lively and Baldoni’s legal dispute over a $400 million defamation case took a turn when Baldoni announced that he would not be modifying the allegations in his lawsuit. In simpler terms, this means that Baldoni has decided to stand by his claims made against Lively in the lawsuit.

As your trusted lifestyle advisor, I’d like to share some news regarding a recent legal matter involving a prominent figure. In this case, I myself won’t be making any changes to the allegations in the dismissed lawsuit, as my attorney Bryan Freedman has made clear.

In a conversation with DailyMail.com, Freedman stated that the court’s decision to dismiss the motion has zero impact on the fact that there was neither harassment nor a smear campaign, and it doesn’t change in any way our robust defense against Ms. Lively’s allegations.

He went on to say, ‘Progress is being made, and we’re optimistic that we can overcome these unfounded allegations. Rather than modifying our current arguments, we’ll explore other legal avenues open to us for our clients.’

Although Baldoni’s lawsuit was initially dismissed in her favor, Lively has continued to pursue her own lawsuit vigorously, and more recently, she dispatched a group of new subpoenas.

A representative from Lively additionally commented on Baldoni’s decision to withdraw his lawsuit against her, speaking to DailyMail.com.

They declared that the entire Baldoni-Wayfarer lawsuit, which was considered baseless and sought a $400 million claim, was dismissed by the Court.

After the court ruling, Baldoni’s lawyer downplayed the significance of the judge dismissing their case, stating they would revise and resubmit it. However, as is often the case, this wasn’t accurate. His spokesperson further clarified that the Court’s rejection of Baldoni’s baseless lawsuit was actually a complete triumph for them instead.

In simpler terms, Judge Lewis J. Liman has given Jane The Virgin star, Baldoni, another chance until June 23rd to make changes to his lawsuit, as he dismissed it initially.

In essence, the judge decided that he was only allowed to modify the accusations related to the charges of tortious interference with a contract and breach of an implied promise.

In a comprehensive analysis spanning 132 pages, the ruling explained why the claims made in Baldoni’s lawsuit lacked substance. This included the assertion that Lively, her spouse, and her publicist, Leslie Sloane, were involved in acts of ‘coercive behavior’ or ‘financial misuse,’ often referred to as ‘civil extortion.’

Today, Blake Lively’s lawyers stated that today’s decision represents a complete triumph and absolute exoneration for Blake Lively, as well as those who were unjustly involved in Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties’ retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, and The New York Times.

From the very beginning, we’ve maintained that this $400 million legal dispute was nothing more than a hoax. The court, in its wisdom, clearly recognized this deception.

We eagerly anticipate the upcoming phase where we aim to recover legal costs, triple compensation, and punitive damages from Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the rest of the Wayfarer Parties involved in this harmful litigation.

According to DailyMail.com’s report, a representative from The New York Times expressed gratitude towards the court for recognizing that the lawsuit filed against The New York Times was baseless and an attempt to suppress truthful journalism.

‘Our reporters diligently and impartially reported on a significant issue, and the court acknowledged that such journalism is meant to be shielded by law. We remain committed to defending our journalistic efforts and our journalists when they face criticism in court.’

Last year, the dispute between Lively and Baldoni became public when accusations of tension escalated into legal conflict. Lively claimed that her co-star had engaged in sexual harassment and launched a counterattack of false claims, which Baldoni refuted.

In her legal action, Lively specifically mentioned several associates of Baldoni, such as Wayfarer Studios (his production company), its chief executive officer and principal investor, as well as public relations representatives Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.

In my role as a lifestyle advisor, let me clarify the recent rumors that have been circulating. Mr. Baldoni has refuted the allegations raised by Ms. Lively, whereas Ms. Lively, Mr. Reynolds, and Ms. Sloane have all denied the claims leveled against them in the court case initiated by Mr. Baldoni.

Baldoni’s group unveiled a site showcasing personal correspondence, like text exchanges, which were part of legal documents depicting their dealings about the creation of the romantic drama with the influential Hollywood duo.

In legal documents, he asserted that they attempted to seize control and sabotage his role as the director of It Ends with Us.

Previously, Baldoni’s team indicated that the documents submitted in court provide a transparent insight into the reasons behind the actions of both parties.

The active website, found at thelawsuitinfo.com, emerges during a series of prominent lawsuits among the movie’s creators, a blockbuster that topped the box office in August of last year.

On December 20, Lively submitted an 80-page civil rights grievance to the California Civil Rights Authority, prior to formally initiating a federal court lawsuit which was filed on December 31.

In her legal claim, the former Gossip Girl actress alleged that Baldoni engaged in sexual misconduct towards her, such as making derogatory comments about her body, and plotted a defamation scheme aimed at tarnishing her public image.

Baldoni informed the court that the group fabricated allegations of sexual misconduct against him, which were untrue.

Baldoni and his representatives have countered the lawsuit’s claims, alleging that Lively distorted the true meaning of text messages exchanged between them and deceived the public concerning their film-making communications.

On the 3rd of June, it was unveiled by DailyMail.com that Lively had withdrawn her accusation of intentionally and negligently causing emotional distress towards Baldoni.

Later, Baldoni filed a lawsuit against the newspaper for a sum of $250 million, accusing them of defamation based on an article published on December 21 entitled “We Can Bury Anyone: An Inside Look at a Hollywood Smear Machine”; however, the newspaper has refuted these claims.

Ever since Lively lodged her complaint, Baldoni has encountered several career repercussions. Among these are a legal action initiated by a past publicist; and dismissal by the agency CAA, which represents both Lively and Reynolds as well.

According to Variety, it’s been stated that WME refutes allegations suggesting that Lively and Reynolds pressured them into removing Baldoni from their list of clients.

Read More

2025-07-01 22:37

Previous post Quinta Brunson says she ‘hated’ the public aspect of her divorce from ex Kevin Anik
Next post Introducing DCU’s First-Ever Hawkgirl Funko Pop: Get Yours Now!