Beyond Statistics: Rethinking Neural Networks with Relational Logic

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new architecture, Hamiltonian Networks, offers a fundamentally different approach to AI by encoding data relationships directly, moving beyond traditional statistical methods.

This review details Hamiltonian Networks, a system leveraging graph encoding, bitwise arithmetic, and energy-based models for hierarchical relational representation.

Conventional artificial neural networks often struggle to explicitly represent and reason about relational structures inherent in data. This limitation motivates the development of a novel computational framework, detailed in ‘A logical re-conception of neural networks: Hamiltonian bitwise part-whole architecture’, which introduces Hamiltonian Networks (HNets) – an architecture that directly encodes relationships as graph-based energy landscapes and operates using radically low-precision arithmetic. By representing data as relational graphs and leveraging bitwise operations, Hnets achieve a unique blend of statistical learning and symbolic computation, enabling the identification of hierarchical, position-based encodings. Could this approach bridge the gap between connectionist and symbolic AI, offering a pathway towards more interpretable and robust machine intelligence?

The Erosion of Statistical Certainty: Towards Relational Understanding

Conventional machine learning systems frequently encounter difficulties when tasked with abstract reasoning and broad generalization due to their fundamental reliance on statistical representations. These approaches excel at identifying patterns within large datasets, but often fall short when confronted with scenarios requiring an understanding of underlying relationships or the ability to extrapolate beyond observed data. The inherent limitations of statistical models stem from their focus on correlations rather than causations, making them susceptible to spurious associations and hindering their capacity to handle novel situations effectively. Consequently, a system trained solely on statistical analysis may struggle to apply learned knowledge to even slightly modified problems, exhibiting a lack of robust intelligence characteristic of human cognition. This dependence on statistical inference restricts the system’s ability to perform tasks requiring symbolic manipulation, logical deduction, or an understanding of abstract concepts – areas where humans effortlessly demonstrate proficiency.

For decades, machine learning has been largely defined by numerical computation, prioritizing statistical patterns over explicit representation of relationships. This emphasis, while yielding impressive results in areas like image recognition and natural language processing, inadvertently overshadows the power of symbolic computation. Symbolic methods, unlike their numerical counterparts, excel at representing and manipulating abstract concepts and hierarchical structures – crucial for tasks demanding reasoning and generalization. By encoding knowledge as symbols and rules, these systems can navigate complexity with greater efficiency and interpretability, potentially unlocking solutions to problems currently intractable for purely statistical models. The continued prioritization of numerical techniques risks overlooking a fundamentally different, and potentially more robust, approach to artificial intelligence – one that mirrors the way humans often reason about the world, through the manipulation of concepts and relationships rather than vast quantities of data.

Despite remarkable advancements in deep learning, contemporary neural network architectures often exhibit limitations when confronted with data possessing inherent hierarchical structures. These systems, predominantly designed for pattern recognition within flattened data streams, struggle to efficiently represent and process relationships defined by nested organization-such as those found in language, code, or complex systems of logic. While effective at tasks like image classification or speech recognition, their performance diminishes when required to understand compositional generalizations or reason about abstract relationships between parts and wholes. This is not a fundamental limitation of artificial intelligence, but rather a consequence of architectural design; current models frequently require substantial data augmentation or specialized training to approximate hierarchical understanding, demonstrating a clear need for systems capable of natively representing and manipulating such structures to unlock more robust and generalizable intelligence.

A critical evolution in artificial intelligence lies in moving beyond purely numerical data processing to systems that explicitly represent and utilize relationships between concepts. Current machine learning models often treat data points as isolated entities, hindering their ability to generalize from limited examples or understand underlying principles. Systems designed to directly encode relational information – specifying how things connect rather than simply what they are – promise to overcome this limitation. This approach allows for the representation of hierarchical structures, causal reasoning, and analogical transfer, mirroring the way humans build knowledge. By focusing on the connections between data, these emerging methods aim to create AI systems capable of more robust, flexible, and interpretable intelligence, ultimately unlocking advancements in areas demanding complex reasoning, such as scientific discovery and problem-solving.

HNet: Encoding Relationships as the Foundation of Intelligence

The Hamiltonian Bitwise Logic Network (HNet) diverges from traditional data representation techniques, such as vectors or matrices, by employing graph structures. This approach treats data instances as nodes within a graph, with edges defining relationships between them. Unlike methods focused on feature vectors, HNet explicitly models inherent structural information present in the data itself. This graph-based encoding allows the network to capture part-whole relationships and dependencies that might be lost when data is flattened into a linear format. The use of graphs facilitates the representation of complex, non-Euclidean data, enabling a more nuanced understanding of the underlying data organization.

HNet employs graph encoding to represent data instances as nodes connected by edges, explicitly modeling part-whole relationships and inherent structural dependencies within the dataset. This approach contrasts with traditional methods that rely on feature vectors or statistical summaries, which often lose or obscure relational information. By representing data as graphs, HNet captures connectivity and dependencies, allowing the model to infer relationships between data elements without explicit feature engineering. This is particularly beneficial for data exhibiting non-Euclidean characteristics or complex dependencies where simple statistical representations are insufficient to capture the underlying structure.

The Hamiltonian Operator within HNet functions as a central mechanism for evaluating the relationships encoded in the graph representation of data. This operator calculates an energy value for each graph, where lower energy states indicate stronger, more consistent relationships between nodes. The energy calculation is based on the connectivity and attributes of the graph, effectively quantifying the strength of associations between data elements. [latex]E = -\sum_{i,j} w_{ij} s_i s_j[/latex], where [latex]E[/latex] represents the energy, [latex]w_{ij}[/latex] the weight of the connection between nodes i and j, and [latex]s_i[/latex] and [latex]s_j[/latex] their respective states. By minimizing this energy function, HNet aims to identify and represent the most salient relational structures within the input data.

To mitigate the computational demands of processing graph-based data, HNet incorporates low-precision arithmetic techniques. Specifically, computations involving the Hamiltonian Operator are performed using reduced numerical precision, such as 8-bit or 16-bit integers, rather than the standard 32-bit or 64-bit floating-point representations. This reduction in precision significantly lowers memory bandwidth requirements and allows for increased throughput via parallel processing on hardware accelerators. The use of low-precision arithmetic introduces a controlled level of approximation, but this trade-off is deemed acceptable for the observed performance gains and scalability improvements when handling large-scale graph datasets. This approach facilitates efficient computation without substantial loss of accuracy, addressing a key limitation of graph neural networks in resource-constrained environments.

Empirical Validation: Demonstrating Relational Capacity

HNet has been evaluated on both the MNIST dataset, a widely used benchmark for handwritten digit recognition, and the Credit Card Application dataset, a tabular dataset typically used for fraud detection. Performance on these datasets demonstrates the system’s adaptability to different data modalities-image data in the case of MNIST, and structured, numerical data for credit card applications. This testing confirms HNet’s functionality extends beyond a single data type, indicating potential for broader application across various machine learning tasks. Results across these datasets establish a baseline for comparative analysis with other machine learning models.

Independent Component Analysis (ICA) was utilized to assess the HNet’s feature extraction capabilities. Results demonstrate the system’s capacity to decompose complex input signals into statistically independent components, effectively isolating key features relevant for downstream tasks. This process confirms that HNet doesn’t simply learn correlations within the data, but instead identifies and separates underlying generative factors. The successful application of ICA provides evidence that the graph-based encoding and Hamiltonian calculations within HNet contribute to a more robust and interpretable feature representation, facilitating improved performance in subsequent analyses and classifications.

HNet utilizes a graph-based data representation and Hamiltonian calculations to enhance classification performance. When integrated with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) backend, HNet achieves a 14% improvement in classification accuracy. This is accomplished by encoding input data as nodes and edges within a graph structure, allowing the system to leverage Hamiltonian spectral analysis for feature extraction. The resulting features are then fed into the SVM classifier, leading to a measurable increase in predictive capability compared to using SVM alone with traditional feature sets.

Evaluations demonstrate that the Hamiltonian Network (HNet) achieves a classification accuracy of 83% across tested datasets. This represents a 14% performance increase when compared to a Support Vector Machine (SVM) utilized as a backend classifier, which achieved 69% accuracy under the same conditions. This quantitative result highlights the efficacy of HNet’s graph-based encoding and Hamiltonian calculations in enhancing classification performance, providing a measurable improvement over traditional machine learning approaches.

Position-based encoding within the HNet architecture facilitates improved relational reasoning by representing data points not as isolated entities, but as nodes within a graph where their location relative to other nodes carries semantic meaning. This positional information is incorporated into the Hamiltonian calculations, allowing the system to discern relationships and dependencies between data elements. Consequently, the network can effectively process data where the spatial or sequential arrangement of components is critical to understanding the underlying patterns and improving overall performance in tasks requiring the identification of connections between data points.

The Horizon of Relational AI: Beyond Pattern Recognition

The demonstrated capabilities of HNet signal a noteworthy evolution in artificial intelligence, moving beyond feature-based approaches towards a paradigm centered on relational AI. This emerging field prioritizes the explicit encoding of relationships between entities, rather than solely focusing on the attributes of those entities themselves. Traditional AI often struggles with tasks requiring an understanding of how things connect; for example, recognizing that ‘John is the brother of Mary’ isn’t simply about identifying John and Mary, but about the specific familial link between them. HNet’s success indicates that representing these connections directly – as first-class citizens within the AI system – unlocks a more robust and flexible form of reasoning. This shift promises advancements in areas like knowledge graphs, common sense reasoning, and the development of AI systems capable of genuinely understanding context and nuance, ultimately fostering more interpretable and trustworthy artificial intelligence.

HNet distinguishes itself through its implementation of abductive inference, a reasoning process where the system doesn’t simply deduce conclusions from known facts, but rather formulates the best explanation for observed data. This contrasts with traditional deductive or inductive approaches, allowing HNet to move beyond pattern recognition and actively generate hypotheses about the relationships within a knowledge graph. Consequently, the system isn’t merely providing answers; it’s offering a rationale for those answers, effectively revealing its thought process. This capacity for explanation is critical for building trust and understanding in AI systems, as it enables users to assess the validity of conclusions and identify potential biases. By prioritizing ‘how’ a conclusion is reached, rather than solely ‘what’ the conclusion is, HNet represents a significant step towards more transparent and interpretable artificial intelligence.

The architecture of HNet reveals striking parallels with principles found in formal grammar, opening exciting avenues for advancements in both natural language processing and knowledge representation. Specifically, the network’s relational structure, where entities are connected by explicitly defined relationships, mirrors the subject-verb-object constructions inherent in grammatical sentences. This resonance suggests HNet could be adapted to parse and generate natural language with increased accuracy, moving beyond statistical correlations to a more structurally informed understanding of meaning. Furthermore, the system’s ability to represent knowledge as interconnected relationships – analogous to a semantic network built upon grammatical rules – provides a robust framework for knowledge representation that is both interpretable and capable of supporting complex reasoning tasks. This grammatical connection isn’t merely metaphorical; it hints at the potential to leverage existing tools and techniques from computational linguistics to refine HNet’s reasoning capabilities and expand its application to diverse domains requiring nuanced understanding of language and knowledge.

Ongoing development of HNet centers on expanding its capacity to process significantly larger and more intricate datasets, a crucial step towards tackling real-world reasoning challenges. Researchers are actively investigating techniques to improve the system’s scalability without sacrificing its core strengths in relational representation and abductive inference. This includes exploring distributed computing architectures and novel data indexing methods. Beyond simply handling increased data volume, the focus extends to applying HNet to domains requiring multi-step reasoning, such as scientific discovery, medical diagnosis, and complex problem-solving, with the ultimate goal of creating an AI capable of not just identifying patterns, but also generating and validating hypotheses to arrive at informed conclusions.

The pursuit of Hamiltonian Networks, as detailed in this conception, echoes a fundamental principle of resilient systems. These networks, built upon relational representation and bitwise arithmetic, attempt to encode understanding directly, rather than relying solely on statistical approximation. This aligns with Turing’s observation that, “No subject is too difficult; it only needs to be broken down into small parts.” The architecture’s emphasis on hierarchical representations, mirroring the part-whole structure, suggests an attempt to build a system that, while complex, maintains internal coherence and can gracefully accommodate the inevitable decay inherent in all computational structures. It is a pursuit of systems designed not just to function, but to endure through logical decomposition.

What Lies Ahead?

The architecture presented here, with its insistence on relational encoding and bitwise operations, does not so much solve the problems of neural networks as relocate them. The shift from weighted sums to Hamiltonian dynamics simply alters the landscape of decay. Every bug encountered within these networks will be a moment of truth in the timeline, revealing the precise point at which the encoded relationships begin to unravel under the pressures of complexity. The elegance of symbolic computation, once hoped for through sheer scale, may instead require a deeper understanding of how information ages within this framework.

A critical juncture lies in addressing the computational cost. The current instantiation, while conceptually compelling, trades statistical efficiency for representational fidelity. This is a familiar bargain, one where technical debt is the past’s mortgage paid by the present. Future work must explore methods to prune the relational graph without sacrificing its expressive power, perhaps by embracing sparsity as an inherent feature, not an optimization target.

Ultimately, the success of Hamiltonian Networks-or any attempt to bridge the statistical and symbolic realms-will not be measured by benchmark scores, but by their capacity to gracefully degrade. A truly intelligent system does not strive for immortality; it accepts its inevitable entropy and, in doing so, reveals the underlying structure of the world it models.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.04911.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-02-07 16:27