BBC confirms it knew about Scott Mills allegations almost a year ago – as it is claimed Radio 2 star ‘was accused of sex offences against boy under 16’

by

As a lifestyle expert, I’m following this story closely. It’s come out that the BBC was actually aware of the allegations surrounding Scott Mills for nearly a year before they decided to take action. It’s surprising to learn that they had this information for so long before moving forward with any changes, and it definitely raises questions about their handling of the situation.

Radio 2 DJ Steve Wright, 53, was unexpectedly let go by the BBC on Monday, just six days after presenting what turned out to be his last breakfast show and being taken off the air.

The Daily Mirror reported last night that the firing of Mills may be connected to a 2018 police investigation. That investigation looked into allegations of serious sexual offenses against a teenager that reportedly occurred between 1997 and 2000. However, the case was closed about seven years ago because police couldn’t find enough evidence.

The Daily Mail reported today that the man was a minor – younger than 16 – when the incidents reportedly happened, and he came forward with information decades later.

Adding to the BBC’s difficulties, it’s been revealed that they received a complaint from a previous employee about allegedly inappropriate messages involving presenter Jeremy Mills, according to the Telegraph.

In May 2025, freelance journalist Anna Brees informed the Corporation that a source had provided her with information about allegations. These allegations weren’t necessarily connected to the same person questioned in relation to the 2018 questioning of Mills.

She inquired if the BBC had any knowledge of or participation in issues connected to this case, and whether they had received any complaints – official or unofficial – regarding Mills that involved the protection of vulnerable people, improper behavior, or harassment.

Ms. Brees, a news presenter for the broadcaster from 2003 to 2011, also asked if the organization had ever looked into the conduct of its popular DJ.

But she claims she was rebuffed on all fronts, never receiving a response from the BBC.

The broadcaster acknowledged on Tuesday that they should have investigated the information further and asked more questions.

A BBC representative stated that they received a media inquiry in 2025, but it didn’t contain much detail.

We should have followed up on this and asked more questions. We sincerely apologize for the oversight and are investigating why it wasn’t done.

‘More broadly, we would always urge anyone who has concerns or information to raise it with us.’

Ms. Brees explained that she received information from a source she considered reliable and, because she was worried about it, she contacted the BBC to let them know and ask for their input. Unfortunately, she didn’t receive a reply.

The criticism that the Corporation took too long to address the issues with one of its prominent personalities is reminiscent of past failures to swiftly investigate serious allegations involving figures like Jimmy Savile, Huw Edwards, and Gregg Wallace. It suggests a pattern of slow and cumbersome responses to sensitive matters.

The BBC isn’t revealing the specific reason for the dismissal, only stating it involved ‘personal conduct’. There’s now increasing public demand for the BBC to disclose what they knew about Mills’s previous involvement with the police and when they found out.

It was reported today that the man who accused Mills of sexual offenses, which allegedly occurred in the 1990s, was a minor – under the age of 16 – at the time.

I remember when the news broke – it was shocking. The presenter, just a young man of 24 back then, was actually questioned by the police in 2018 as part of the investigation. It was a serious situation, and I followed it closely.

I still can’t believe it! They actually closed the case! I’ve been following everything so closely, and Scotland Yard confirmed detectives sent all their findings to the Crown Prosecution Service, but they just…rejected it. Said there wasn’t enough evidence. It’s infuriating! This all happened back in 2019, and honestly, it feels like they just gave up. I just want justice!

The Daily Mail has learned the person who made the complaint may have been prompted to come forward again because of the recent Huw Edwards documentary.

Sources inside the BBC suggest the individual in question may have approached the corporation because of the significant media attention surrounding Martin Clunes’s involvement in the documentary ‘Power: The Downfall of Huw Edwards’.

Okay, so I’ve been following this for years, and Mark Williams-Thomas – he’s amazing, a real pro – just dropped this bombshell! Apparently, his sources inside the police told him that Nigel Mills was actually interviewed by the Met back in 2018. It was connected to Operation Yewtree, but a separate part of it, like a little offshoot investigation. I mean, this is HUGE! It confirms so many things I’ve suspected all along!

Mark Williams-Thomas played a key role in revealing the crimes of Jimmy Savile, and his investigations ultimately led to police inquiries involving Savile and other individuals, such as Rolf Harris.

He recently told the Daily Mail that after the numerous allegations following the Jimmy Savile case, police received many complaints. These complaints led to several well-known figures, including Scott Mills, being named. While Mills wasn’t charged with any crime, he was allowed to continue his career.

After beginning his radio career with local stations in Hampshire, Bristol, and Manchester, Mills moved to Heart 106.2 in 1995. He then joined BBC Radio 1 in 1998 and announced his departure yesterday after 28 years with the network.

According to one source, Tony Hall, who was the director general during the police investigation, wasn’t aware of the claims being made.

A BBC executive told the Daily Mail that many leaders at the corporation suspect the firing of Mills and the release of the Edwards drama were intentionally connected in timing.

‘The Huw Edwards drama showed that there could be a reckoning’, they said.

A BBC insider mentioned that the idea of the Huw Edwards situation being the ‘trigger’ for recent events is a common topic of discussion within the corporation.

The Daily Mirror reported last night that the firing of Mills followed a 2016 police investigation into allegations of serious sexual offenses against a teenager.

Honestly, it still drives me crazy that they never explained why they let him keep working for so long! I mean, for years, nothing happened, and now, almost ten years later, they finally fired him? They won’t even say what changed, or why it took them so long. It’s just… frustrating, as a longtime admirer of the BBC, to see them be so secretive about it all.

A BBC broadcaster reported that there was complete shock throughout the organization following the dismissal of Mills.

Staff reportedly gasped audibly when they received an email on Monday morning from BBC Director of Music, Lorna Clarke.

People who know him say he’s a kind and generous person, and his friends are deeply saddened by what’s happening.

He was also described by a radio colleague as ‘hugely popular’ internally.

‘It is not like the BBC to act so fast’, a household name broadcaster told the Daily Mail.

I’m hearing all sorts of crazy gossip from inside Broadcasting House about why he was let go. It’s really wild, and everyone seems to have a different theory!

‘No suspension period or prolonged investigation does not bode well’, another insider said.

Read More

2026-03-31 22:07