Commentary: ‘Outlander’ finale marks the end of a great show and an unprecedented age of TV

by

The eighth and final season of the Starz drama “Outlander” is here, and viewers are bracing for an emotional ending. Many are worried that the beloved story of Claire and Jamie Fraser might conclude with one or both of them dying, and no matter what happens, expect tears.

It’s not just disappointing that the show is ending – it was one of Starz’s biggest hits. It also marks the loss of a truly memorable moment in television.

In many ways, the finale of “Outlander” marks the end of an age.

In 2014, when television was experiencing a creative boom and capturing widespread attention, Ronald D. Moore brought Diana Gabaldon’s historical fantasy novels to the screen. At the time, traditional networks were thriving, and streaming services were just beginning to offer original shows – it wasn’t yet clear how dramatically they would change the television landscape. There was plenty of work for everyone, and the arrival of streaming originals felt fresh and exciting.

Television

Sam Heughan and Caitriona Balfe, who star together in the Starz series Outlander, recently discussed filming the final season, potential storylines for the ending, and how viewers might react.

When “Outlander” debuted, it was part of a wave of similarly bold and creative shows like “True Detective,” “The Leftovers,” “Penny Dreadful,” “Fargo,” “Transparent,” “Jane the Virgin,” and “How to Get Away With Murder.” These series joined a television landscape already crowded with popular, critically praised shows such as “Mad Men,” “Orange is the New Black,” “The Americans,” “Downton Abbey,” “Homeland,” “Sherlock,” “The Walking Dead,” “The Good Wife,” “Game of Thrones,” “Orphan Black,” and “Girls.”

Most anthology series have concluded, with “True Detective” and “Fargo” being notable exceptions. This makes “Outlander” unusual – it’s one of the few shows that has run throughout the major changes in 21st-century television, from its initial creative boom to the current period of having too much content and now, a shrinking landscape. Originally shown on premium cable, it’s now widely available on streaming platforms like Starz, fitting its time-travel theme both in how it’s presented and in its story.

I’m a huge “Outlander” fan, and while it hasn’t exactly dominated awards shows or created the same level of online buzz as some other shows – though Scotland definitely saw a boost in American tourists! – I think it’s really fitting that it’s lasted as long as it has. The show is all about people surviving tough times and huge changes, and it’s awesome that the final season is actually more popular than the last four, according to Starz. It feels like a little bit of poetic justice for a show that’s always been about resilience.

Similar to the way art itself has changed recently, this series focuses just as much on upheaval and change as it does on romantic relationships.

We first encounter Claire and her husband, Frank Randall, shortly after they’ve reunited following World War II – Claire worked as a nurse during the war, and Frank was in British intelligence. They’re taking a trip to Inverness, Scotland, for a second honeymoon before Frank starts a teaching position at Oxford. During their visit, they explore both the historical monuments of the Battle of Culloden – where British troops defeated the Jacobites and changed Highland culture forever – and the legendary, mystical standing stones of Craigh na Dun.

Claire returns to Craigh na Dun by herself and, upon touching the central stone, finds herself back in 1743 – three years before the Jacobite rising was lost. (Be aware: spoilers for “Outlander” follow.)

Starz was known for historical dramas filled with conflict and intensity—shows like “Spartacus,” “The White Queen,” “Da Vinci’s Demons,” and “The Pillars of the Earth.” “Outlander” offered something different—a touch of magic and romance—while still fitting into that style, and it featured a smart, though sometimes surprised, female protagonist.

I was hooked on “Outlander” from the start – it was such a clever blend of historical drama, time travel, and, let’s be honest, some seriously steamy romance! The show really captured the beauty of the Scottish Highlands, and I’m sure it gave tourism there a huge boost. What I also loved was the incredible cast – it felt like a who’s who of British and Irish acting talent, with faces like Simon Callow, Maria Doyle Kennedy, James Fleet, Laura Donnelly, Bill Paterson, and Frances de la Tour popping up. They really elevated every scene!

The show’s opening was particularly captivating for fantasy lovers, featuring a haunting version of the traditional Scottish folk song, “The Skye Boat Song.” Despite pleas from Scottish cast and crew members who felt the song was overused, the creator wisely kept it, though the tune’s style and pace were adjusted throughout the series. Raya Yarbrough sang the opening theme for the first six seasons, followed by Sinead O’Connor in Season 7 and Annie Lennox in Season 8.

The story starts with a classic time travel setup. Claire unexpectedly finds herself in the past, completely disoriented. She quickly encounters the harsh realities of the time, including danger from the villainous British officer Jonathan Randall – the ancestor of her husband Frank, and played by the same actor. After being saved by Murtagh Fraser, she’s taken captive by a group of Highlanders led by Dougal MacKenzie, who then brings her to Colum MacKenzie, the lord of Castle Leoch.

With her passionate personality, medical skills, and the historical insights Frank shared on their journey, she successfully prevents an attack on the Highlanders and starts to build a reputation as a healer, notably by tending to Jamie Fraser’s injuries. The MacKenzies, though, are wary of this enigmatic young woman who seems to know too much about British army plans. They treat her with courtesy, but don’t let her go.

With the chances of returning to her own time and being with Frank dwindling, Claire has to adjust to her new reality and rethink everything she thought she knew about history. She realizes the MacKenzies need to protect her from the British army, not the other way around. This leads to her marriage to Jamie, which starts as a practical arrangement but soon blossoms into a passionate and genuine love.

Claire and Jamie’s love and passion will carry them through many adventures over the next seven seasons—and potentially for centuries, depending on the time period you follow. Their journey takes them to places like Paris, Barbados, and America, where they face constant danger. They endure imprisonment, injuries, kidnappings, and even a witch trial for Claire and torture for Jamie. They also experience heartbreaking losses like the death of a child, survive shipwrecks, and grapple with the treacherous politics of both British and French societies. Most dramatically, their attempt to avoid the Battle of Culloden fails, leading Jamie to send a pregnant Claire back to the future, resulting in decades of separation.

Claire and Frank reconnect and have a child together, though their relationship is complicated by Claire’s continued longing for Jamie, who is a prisoner of war before returning to his estate, Lallybroch, and also missing Claire. Later, Claire discovers Jamie survived the Battle of Culloden. In Season 4, having become a doctor, she shares the truth about Brianna’s (Sophie Skelton) parentage with her grown daughter, and travels back in time through the stones once more.

That’s when the story starts to become overly complicated. It’s not necessarily more dangerous – although the growing number of characters, like Brianna, Jamie’s nephew Ian, and various children, does mean more instances of violence like assault, abduction, and imprisonment – but the time travel aspect gets increasingly convoluted.

In the 1700s, Claire crossed paths with several people who, like her, were out of place in time. Early on, she met the difficult Geillis Duncan, who became involved with Jamie’s enemy, Dougal MacKenzie. Later, while in Paris in Season 2 trying to prevent the disastrous Battle of Culloden, Claire encountered two more potential time travelers: the unsettling Comte St. Germain and the enigmatic apothecary, Master Raymond.

Throughout the series, people start traveling through portals with increasing frequency, almost like daily commuters. After Claire goes back to the 1700s, Brianna eventually joins her to meet her father and attempt to save her parents from a dangerous fate. She’s joined by her boyfriend, Roger, who unexpectedly discovers he’s related to Geillis and Dougal.

The couple spends time in the past, faces dangers, and has two children. They briefly return to the 20th century before going back to different periods in the 1700s, where Roger discovers his father and several great-uncles are also time travelers. They eventually settle on Fraser’s Ridge in North Carolina, joining a community of other time travelers – some of whom are trying to warn the local Native American tribes about future threats.

The already crowded timeline became even more packed with the new “Outlander” prequel, “Blood of My Blood.” It was revealed that Claire’s parents didn’t die in a car accident in Scotland as she thought. They actually survived and each separately found Craigh na Dun, which sent them back in time to when Jamie’s parents were first falling in love.

Honestly, the only person who appears incapable of time travel at this point is Jamie.

The way the families of MacKenzie, Fraser, and Beauchamp (Claire’s ancestors) kept intersecting, with relatives from different eras meeting, reinforced the story’s theme of destiny. This also created a playful, though sometimes unsettling, puzzle for viewers to solve. However, it started to stretch the boundaries of believability, even considering the show’s time travel elements.

I absolutely love “Outlander,” but it hasn’t been flawless lately. As the show went on, it felt like they tried to do too much, adding a lot of storylines and characters. The connection between Claire and Jamie – played by Caitriona Balfe and Sam Heughan – is still amazing, honestly, and that’s what kept me watching for so long. But even that incredible love story can’t hold up an entire eight seasons, and unfortunately, a lot of the recent episodes focused on characters I just didn’t find as compelling.

Many viewers felt tired of the American setting and wanted the show to return to Scotland. While “Outlander” does a good job of highlighting the diverse backgrounds of those who fought in the Revolutionary War – including immigrants, formerly enslaved people, and free Black Americans – the American Revolution is a more familiar story for American audiences. The conflicts between the Highlanders and the British, however, offered a more exciting and immersive experience.

Ultimately, this adaptation remains true to Diana Gabaldon’s original story, even though the television series will conclude before her tenth and final ‘Outlander’ book is released.

Like many stories about time travel, “Outlander” highlights how important it is to understand history and how each era influences the next. This final season tackles this idea more directly. Brianna travels back in time with a book written by Frank about Jamie, detailing Jamie’s predicted death in battle. It appears Frank wrote the book as a warning, hoping to give Jamie enough information to avoid that fate. (It’s worth remembering that in the very first episode, before Claire time-traveled, Frank seemingly saw Jamie’s ghost – what that means is open to interpretation.)

Even though Menzies doesn’t appear on screen in the final season, his character, Frank, is still heard through voiceover. This cleverly connects the series back to its beginning and ensures Frank isn’t forgotten. More importantly, Frank’s knowledge of history could be crucial to saving Jamie’s life and helps him prepare for what’s to come.

Again, that feels like an eerily prescient message for our own time.

Claire and Jamie have realized their efforts to change the past haven’t really worked, meaning Jamie’s safety isn’t guaranteed. As with any TV show, the biggest danger is how it all ends. While “Outlander” is aware of its own history and impact on television, some viewers will inevitably be happy with the ending, and others won’t.

That is one future no amount of foreknowledge or planning can avoid.

Read More

2026-05-12 13:32