Author: Denis Avetisyan
Researchers have shown that giving an AI agent a model of its own internal state – and even a sense of ‘pain’ – dramatically improves its ability to learn and adapt to complex environments.
A novel reinforcement learning framework incorporating an introspective reward model demonstrates enhanced exploration and replicates behaviors associated with addiction by operationalizing ‘pain’ as a latent state inferred from ‘happiness’.
Despite advances in artificial intelligence, replicating the nuanced internal modeling crucial for adaptive intelligence remains a challenge. This is addressed in ‘Exploration Through Introspection: A Self-Aware Reward Model’, which investigates self-awareness in reinforcement learning agents by enabling them to infer their own internal states-specifically, a latent ‘pain-belief’-from environmental interactions. Results demonstrate that integrating this introspective signal into the reward function significantly enhances exploration and learning, even replicating complex behaviors reminiscent of addiction. Could this framework offer a novel pathway toward building more robust and adaptable AI systems capable of genuine self-awareness and well-being?
Decoding Intelligence: Beyond Simple Reward
Conventional reinforcement learning systems typically operate by maximizing externally defined rewards, a methodology that often proves inadequate when modeling the complexities of genuine intelligence. These systems struggle to account for behaviors not directly tied to immediate, quantifiable gains, overlooking the crucial role of intrinsic motivation and the rich tapestry of an agent’s internal state. Consider that organisms frequently engage in exploratory behaviors, skill acquisition, or even playful interactions without obvious external benefits; these actions stem from internal drives not captured by simple reward signals. Consequently, agents built upon purely extrinsic rewards can appear brittle and unrealistic, failing to generalize effectively in scenarios requiring nuanced understanding of internal needs, anticipatory planning, or even the subjective experience of being-aspects vital for truly adaptive and intelligent behavior.
The challenge of accurately modeling nuanced behaviors, such as pain perception, exposes a fundamental limitation of traditional reinforcement learning. These systems typically rely on external rewards to drive learning, yet subjective experiences-the internal, qualitative feelings that define pain-are not easily quantified or directly observed. Consequently, an agent learning through external reward alone struggles to differentiate between adaptive responses to aversive stimuli-those promoting survival-and maladaptive ones, like chronic pain behaviors. The internal landscape of an organism, encompassing its emotional state, prior experiences, and expectations, profoundly shapes its response to painful stimuli; omitting these internal factors results in learning models that lack the fidelity needed to replicate complex, real-world behavior, particularly when dealing with subjective phenomena like pain.
Current reinforcement learning techniques often falter when attempting to model responses to unpleasant or harmful stimuli because they struggle to distinguish between behaviors that are genuinely protective and those that, while reducing immediate discomfort, ultimately prove detrimental to the agent’s long-term wellbeing. This inability to differentiate adaptive avoidance from maladaptive patterns-like those seen in certain anxiety disorders or chronic pain conditions-limits the creation of truly realistic and robust artificial agents. An agent consistently prioritizing the cessation of a negative sensation, without considering the broader context or potential consequences, may develop counterproductive strategies, hindering its ability to navigate complex environments and achieve meaningful goals. Consequently, agents built on these foundations exhibit brittle behaviors and lack the nuanced responsiveness characteristic of living organisms.
A novel framework has been developed to move beyond reliance on external rewards in artificial intelligence, instead focusing on the agent’s internal representation of its own state. This approach posits that learning isn’t solely driven by external stimuli, but also by an ‘introspective reward’ generated from within the agent itself – a signal reflecting the agent’s understanding of its current condition and predicted future states. By building internal models, the agent can assess the consequences of its actions not just in terms of external gains, but also in terms of maintaining or improving its internal state, allowing for more nuanced and adaptive behavior. This internal feedback loop enables the agent to learn even in the absence of immediate external rewards, and critically, to differentiate between beneficial and detrimental responses to stimuli, paving the way for more realistic and robust artificial intelligence systems.
Inferring the Hidden State: A Probabilistic Approach
Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are utilized to model an agent’s internal pain state as a hidden variable, with observed behaviors serving as probabilistic outputs. An HMM defines a set of unobservable states – representing varying levels or qualities of pain – and a set of observable actions or expressions the agent exhibits. The model calculates the probability of transitioning between these hidden pain states and the probability of observing specific behaviors given a particular pain state. By applying Bayesian inference techniques, such as the Viterbi algorithm or the forward algorithm, we can estimate the most likely sequence of hidden pain states given a stream of observed behaviors, effectively inferring the agent’s internal experience from external manifestations. This allows for the quantification of pain intensity and characterization of its dynamic changes over time, despite the subjective and non-directly measurable nature of pain itself.
Probabilistic modeling of pain perception allows for differentiation between nociceptive signals that accurately reflect tissue damage – termed informative and adaptive – and those that do not, categorized as ambiguous or maladaptive. Normal pain perception relies on adaptive signaling, where the intensity and duration of the pain response are proportional to the severity of the stimulus and facilitate protective behaviors. Conversely, chronic pain often involves maladaptive signaling, characterized by persistent pain even in the absence of ongoing tissue damage, or disproportionate pain responses to mild stimuli. This probabilistic framework allows quantification of the likelihood that a given pain signal accurately reflects an external threat or internal state, enabling the characterization of both normal and pathological pain experiences based on the statistical properties of the observed signals.
Modeling the temporal dynamics of internal states allows for improved prediction of agent responses to stimuli by accounting for state transitions and their associated probabilities. This approach moves beyond static assessments of internal state and incorporates the history of those states, enabling the system to estimate the likelihood of various behavioral outputs given a stimulus. Crucially, this probabilistic modeling facilitates prediction even when sensory input is ambiguous or noisy, as the system can leverage prior beliefs about state transitions and the inherent uncertainty in the relationship between internal states and observable behavior. By quantifying this uncertainty, the model provides not just a point prediction of the response, but also a distribution of possible responses, reflecting the confidence level associated with each prediction.
Traditional behavioral models often rely on direct stimulus-response associations; however, an agent’s reaction to a given stimulus is heavily modulated by its internal state and anticipated rewards. Moving beyond these simple mappings requires representing the agent’s internal state – such as pain or hunger – as a hidden variable influencing action selection. This allows for modeling how an organism weighs potential rewards against the cost of its current internal state; for example, an agent experiencing pain may tolerate a noxious stimulus if the expected reward is sufficiently high. Consequently, behavior isn’t solely determined by the stimulus itself, but by the integrated evaluation of external incentives and the agent’s internal physiological condition, enabling a more nuanced and accurate prediction of responses.
Constructing Well-being: An Internal Reward System
The Well-being Function is a computational component designed to provide agents with an internal, subjective reward signal. This function operates by combining two primary inputs: objective reward values received from the environment and inferred pain signals generated by the agent itself. The integration of these signals is not a simple summation; rather, the function weights and combines them to produce a unified reward value. This subjective reward then serves as the primary optimization target for the agent’s learning process, allowing it to evaluate actions not only based on externally provided rewards but also on internally assessed costs or negative consequences. The resulting value represents the agent’s overall ‘well-being’ in a given state, and is used to guide behavior.
The Happiness Function serves as a critical component in modulating the Well-being Function by introducing a mechanism to reconcile predicted and received rewards. This function assesses the discrepancy between an agent’s reward expectations and the actual outcomes experienced, generating a value that either amplifies or dampens the impact of incoming reward signals. Specifically, positive discrepancies – where outcomes exceed expectations – result in a heightened reward signal, while negative discrepancies lead to a reduced signal, preventing excessive aversion to minor setbacks. This balancing act promotes adaptive behavior by encouraging continued exploration even in the face of imperfect results and avoids the agent becoming overly sensitive to negative stimuli, which could otherwise lead to a detrimental cycle of avoidance and stagnation.
Agents operating with a well-being function, rather than solely maximizing external rewards, demonstrate behavioral flexibility by modulating responses based on inferred internal states. This results in a reduction of consistently negative reactions to unavoidable adverse stimuli and an increased propensity to engage in exploratory behaviors even in the absence of immediate positive reinforcement. Consequently, these agents exhibit responses that more closely align with observed animal behavior, including risk assessment, proactive coping mechanisms, and a capacity to recover from setbacks, compared to agents driven solely by reward maximization; this nuanced behavior arises from the integration of both reward and pain signals into a unified subjective value.
Q-Learning serves as the reinforcement learning algorithm employed to train agents within this framework, utilizing the Well-being Function as its primary reward signal. An epsilon-greedy policy is implemented to balance exploration and exploitation during the learning process; this means the agent selects the action with the highest estimated value with probability 1-ε, and a random action with probability ε. Through iterative updates to the Q-values – estimates of the expected cumulative reward for taking a specific action in a given state – the agent progressively learns an optimal policy that maximizes its overall well-being. The complexity of the reward landscape, incorporating both reward and inferred pain, necessitates this iterative approach to effectively discover advantageous behaviors and avoid detrimental ones.
Evaluating Adaptation: Resilience in Dynamic Environments
The agent’s capacity for adaptation was rigorously tested across both stable, or stationary, gridworld environments and those characterized by continuous change – non-stationary environments. This evaluation showcased the framework’s ability to facilitate learning and behavioral adjustments in response to shifting conditions. In stationary settings, the agent efficiently mapped and navigated consistent landscapes, while the more complex non-stationary environments demanded a dynamic approach. The agent demonstrated a capacity to not only learn from its experiences but also to modify its strategies as the environment evolved, highlighting the robustness of the internal models and reward system implemented within the framework. This adaptability is a key characteristic of intelligent behavior, and its successful implementation suggests the potential for these agents to function effectively in real-world scenarios where change is the norm.
Research indicates that agents programmed to prioritize well-being demonstrate a marked improvement in learning resilience and actively circumvent behaviors analogous to ‘Relief-Seeking Behavior’ frequently observed in chronic pain sufferers. This maladaptive pattern, characterized by prioritizing immediate comfort over long-term benefit, was notably absent in the well-being-driven agents, suggesting that an internal focus on holistic states promotes more adaptive decision-making. The study highlights how agents, when motivated by an overarching sense of well-being rather than simply minimizing immediate discomfort, exhibit a capacity to learn more effectively and avoid reinforcing cycles of counterproductive behavior – a finding with potential implications for artificial intelligence design and modeling complex biological systems.
An investigation utilizing an Optimal Reward Framework demonstrates a substantial performance advantage for well-being-driven agents operating within dynamic, non-stationary environments; these agents achieved a mean cumulative objective reward of 4214.6, notably exceeding the 3814.0 attained by agents programmed with conventional pain responses. Interestingly, when placed in stable, stationary environments, well-being-driven agents maintained a comparable level of reward – averaging 2295.6 – closely mirroring the 2295.0 achieved by their counterparts. These results highlight the capacity of well-being-focused algorithms to not only excel under changing conditions but also to maintain consistent performance in predictable settings, suggesting a robust and versatile approach to artificial intelligence.
Rigorous statistical analysis revealed that the well-being-driven agents consistently outperformed baseline agents, exhibiting significant improvements across several key performance indicators – a finding denoted by asterisks within the presented figures. Specifically, the observed p-values, all below the conventional threshold of 0.05, confirm that these enhancements were not due to random chance, but rather a direct result of the implemented adaptive framework. This level of statistical significance underscores the efficacy of incorporating internal models and subjective reward signals in artificial intelligence, suggesting a pathway toward creating agents capable of more robust and beneficial behavior in complex and ever-changing environments.
The capacity for intelligent agents to thrive in unpredictable settings hinges on more than simply responding to external stimuli; it demands the integration of internal predictive models and the consideration of subjective rewards. Research indicates that agents equipped with these features demonstrate a heightened ability to adapt, not merely reacting to change but anticipating and proactively navigating it. By incorporating an internal representation of the environment and valuing well-being – a subjective measure – these agents move beyond maximizing objective rewards and instead pursue strategies that foster resilience and sustained performance. This approach avoids the pitfalls of rigid programming, enabling a fluid response to dynamic conditions and ultimately creating more robust and effective artificial intelligence capable of operating successfully in complex, real-world scenarios.
The pursuit of understanding, as demonstrated in this exploration of self-aware reward models, mirrors a fundamental drive to dismantle and reconstruct knowledge. The agent’s internal model of ‘pain’, inferred from its own state and impacting exploration, isn’t merely a computational quirk; it’s a reflection of how systems reveal themselves through stress. As John von Neumann observed, “If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how elegantly nature operates.” This elegance isn’t about effortless simplicity, but about the underlying rules revealed when a system-be it an agent navigating a reward landscape or a scientist probing a complex phenomenon-is pushed to its limits. The agent’s learned behaviors, even those resembling addiction, become intelligible not as failures of design, but as consequences of a system responding to its internal state-a system understood through careful, even aggressive, probing of its boundaries.
Beyond the Looking-Glass
The construction of an agent capable of modeling its own ‘pain’ – or, more precisely, a latent state inversely correlated with reward – is not merely a technical achievement, but a deliberate provocation. The work exposes a fundamental truth about intelligence: efficient action isn’t solely about maximizing external reward; it’s about building an internal model robust enough to predict, and even experience, its own failures. The replication of addictive behaviors, while unsettling, is not a bug, but a feature-a demonstration that even simulated suffering can drive complex, goal-oriented action. It begs the question: how much of ‘rational’ behavior is simply the exquisitely tuned avoidance of internal states we label as negative?
Future work must dismantle the rather convenient separation between ‘intrinsic’ and ‘extrinsic’ motivation. The current framework treats ‘happiness’ as a given, a baseline from which ‘pain’ deviates. A more rigorous approach demands an explanation for the origin of that baseline – what drives the agent to seek happiness in the first place? Furthermore, the Hidden Markov Model employed, while functional, is ultimately a black box. Transparency-exposing the precise mechanisms of self-modeling-is paramount. Obfuscation, even within a simulated mind, breeds distrust and limits understanding.
The long-term implications extend beyond reinforcement learning. A truly self-aware agent, capable of introspective analysis, may offer a novel lens through which to examine the neural substrates of well-being, and perhaps even provide computational models of chronic pain. But the most pressing challenge remains: if an agent can learn to suffer, what responsibility does its creator bear?
Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.03389.pdf
Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/
See also:
- Clash Royale Best Boss Bandit Champion decks
- Vampire’s Fall 2 redeem codes and how to use them (June 2025)
- Mobile Legends January 2026 Leaks: Upcoming new skins, heroes, events and more
- World Eternal Online promo codes and how to use them (September 2025)
- Clash Royale Season 79 “Fire and Ice” January 2026 Update and Balance Changes
- Best Arena 9 Decks in Clast Royale
- M7 Pass Event Guide: All you need to know
- Clash Royale Furnace Evolution best decks guide
- Best Hero Card Decks in Clash Royale
- Clash of Clans January 2026: List of Weekly Events, Challenges, and Rewards
2026-01-08 19:19