Teaching Robots to Walk: A Smooth Path to Dynamic Locomotion

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

Researchers have developed a new technique that streamlines the learning process for legged robots, enabling them to master complex movements with greater efficiency and stability.

A learning framework streamlines robotic motion by initially training a policy on a simplified model before seamlessly transferring that knowledge to a full-body environment, leveraging model homotopy to ensure a smooth adaptation of core motion patterns.
A learning framework streamlines robotic motion by initially training a policy on a simplified model before seamlessly transferring that knowledge to a full-body environment, leveraging model homotopy to ensure a smooth adaptation of core motion patterns.

This work introduces Model Homotopy Transfer, a framework combining simplified model pre-training with a continuous transition to full-body dynamics for robust policy learning and transfer.

Generating dynamic and stable locomotion for legged robots remains a significant challenge, often requiring extensive tuning or expert demonstrations. This work introduces a novel framework, ‘Dynamic Policy Learning for Legged Robot with Simplified Model Pretraining and Model Homotopy Transfer’, to address this limitation by combining pre-training on simplified models with a smooth transfer to full-body dynamics. The core innovation lies in ‘model homotopy transfer’, progressively adapting policies learned on a single rigid body to complex, full-body environments by gradually redistributing mass and inertia. This approach not only accelerates learning but also enhances transfer stability, as demonstrated through simulations and experiments on a quadrupedal robot; but can this continuation-based learning strategy be generalized to even more complex and varied robotic systems?

The Illusion of Control: Why Robots Still Trip

Achieving truly robust and dynamic locomotion in robots presents a significant challenge due to the inherent complexity of interacting with unpredictable real-world environments. Unlike simulations, physical terrains are rarely perfectly known, and unexpected disturbances – a loose pebble, a slight incline, or an uneven surface – demand immediate, adaptive responses. Simultaneously, the computational burden of planning these movements is substantial; calculating optimal trajectories requires factoring in numerous variables, including joint limits, friction coefficients, and contact forces. This combination of environmental uncertainty and computational expense often leads to robotic systems that are either overly cautious and slow, or prone to instability and failure when confronted with even minor deviations from their planned path. Consequently, researchers are actively exploring methods to balance responsiveness with reliability, seeking algorithms that can enable robots to navigate complex landscapes with both speed and grace.

While trajectory optimization remains a powerful technique for robot control, its practical application faces significant hurdles. The core challenge lies in the inherent nonconvexity of many robotic systems – meaning the search space for optimal trajectories isn’t smoothly curved, leading to algorithms getting stuck in local minima. This is further complicated by hybrid dynamics, where a robot transitions between different modes of movement – such as sliding versus rolling – introducing discontinuities that are difficult to model and optimize. Critically, even if an optimal trajectory can be computed, the complex calculations often demand excessive processing time, making real-time control – essential for reacting to unpredictable environments – a major obstacle. Researchers are therefore exploring methods to approximate these complex dynamics or develop algorithms capable of efficiently navigating nonconvex solution spaces to achieve robust and responsive robotic movement.

Creating accurate robotic simulations is a persistent challenge, as fully representing a robot’s complexity-including joint friction, motor dynamics, and environmental interactions-quickly becomes computationally intractable. While detailed models offer greater fidelity, the resulting simulations demand excessive processing power, hindering real-time control and iterative design. Consequently, roboticists often resort to simplified models, reducing the number of degrees of freedom or abstracting physical properties. However, this simplification introduces a ‘reality gap’ – discrepancies between the simulated environment and the real world – which can lead to unpredictable behavior and diminished performance when the robot is deployed in a physical setting. Bridging this gap requires innovative approaches to model reduction, efficient simulation techniques, and robust control algorithms that can account for the inherent uncertainties arising from these approximations.

This model homotopy transfer enables stable and progressive learning of complex, dynamic behaviors-like wall-assisted maneuvers-by smoothly transitioning from simplified dynamics (<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">SRB</span>) to full-body physics through gradual mass and inertia redistribution.
This model homotopy transfer enables stable and progressive learning of complex, dynamic behaviors-like wall-assisted maneuvers-by smoothly transitioning from simplified dynamics (SRB) to full-body physics through gradual mass and inertia redistribution.

Stripping it Down: Why Less is Often More

Directly training reinforcement learning policies on full-body robot models presents significant challenges due to the high dimensionality of the state and action spaces. This complexity necessitates extensive reward function engineering to guide the learning process, a task which is both time-consuming and prone to specifying unintended behaviors. Furthermore, even with carefully designed reward functions, the inherent difficulty of the learning problem often results in suboptimal policies that fail to fully exploit the robot’s capabilities or exhibit limited generalization to novel situations. The large state and action spaces also increase the sample complexity, requiring a substantial amount of interaction with the environment to achieve acceptable performance.

Training robotic policies on highly complex, full-body models presents significant challenges; therefore, an initial training phase utilizing a ‘Single Rigid Body Model’ is proving effective. This simplified representation abstracts the robot to a single rigid body, dramatically reducing the state and action spaces and consequently the complexity of the learning problem. By first establishing a robust policy on this simplified model, the system can learn fundamental dynamic behaviors – such as balancing and locomotion – without the confounding factors of full body coordination. This approach effectively provides a strong foundation upon which more complex behaviors can be built, accelerating the learning process and improving the stability of the final policy when transferred to the full-body robot.

Simplified Model Pretraining leverages the benefits of initial policy development on a reduced-complexity robot representation to accelerate learning on the full-body model. By first establishing a functional policy within the simplified environment, the subsequent training process on the more complex system avoids the challenges associated with learning entirely from scratch. This transfer reduces the search space for optimal behaviors, diminishing the need for extensive reward engineering and improving both the stability and efficiency of the learning process. The pre-trained policy provides a robust foundation, enabling the full-body model to rapidly adapt and achieve proficient performance with fewer training iterations.

Model Homotopy Transfer facilitates the transition of a control policy learned on a simplified robot model to a more complex, full-body model by progressively increasing model fidelity during training. Evaluations on the wall-assisted backflip task demonstrate a 19.0% increase in normalized return and a doubling of convergence speed when compared to imitation learning (IT). This approach ensures enhanced stability and improved performance by systematically adapting the policy to the increasing complexity of the robot model, effectively leveraging the benefits of training on a simplified representation while achieving robust results on the target system.

Model Homotopy Transfer consistently outperformed other methods across diverse motions, achieving the fastest convergence and highest consistency in normalized returns, as demonstrated by learning curves for the wall-assisted backflip and convergence metrics.
Model Homotopy Transfer consistently outperformed other methods across diverse motions, achieving the fastest convergence and highest consistency in normalized returns, as demonstrated by learning curves for the wall-assisted backflip and convergence metrics.

The Illusion of Robustness: Patching Over the Cracks

Domain randomization is a training methodology utilized to enhance the generalization capability of control policies when transitioning from simulation to real-world deployment. This technique involves varying simulation parameters – including physical properties like friction, mass, and damping, as well as visual characteristics like textures and lighting – across a wide range of values during training. By exposing the policy to a diverse set of simulated environments, the learned control strategy becomes more robust to the inevitable discrepancies between the simulated and real-world domains, effectively reducing the need for precise system identification or domain adaptation techniques during real-world execution.

Concurrent Estimation enhances state awareness by processing historical sensor data to derive estimations of linear velocity and contact states. This process moves beyond reliance on direct sensor readings, which can be noisy or incomplete, to build a more accurate and temporally consistent understanding of the system’s dynamic state. Accurate estimation of linear velocity is critical for predictive control and trajectory planning, while reliable contact state determination-identifying when and where the system is in contact with the environment-is essential for maintaining balance and executing dynamic maneuvers such as running, jumping, and recovering from disturbances. The resulting refined state estimates enable more robust and precise control, particularly in scenarios with unpredictable external forces or imperfect sensor data.

The integration of transfer learning and robustness techniques facilitates the execution of advanced robotic behaviors beyond basic locomotion. Specifically, these methods enable successful performance of ‘Wall-Assisted Maneuvers’, where the robot utilizes wall contact for stability and navigation; complex aerial maneuvers such as ‘Backflip’, requiring precise control of body orientation and momentum; and the implementation of sophisticated ‘Gaits’, including trotting, which demonstrated a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.28 m/s for velocity tracking, a substantial improvement over the 0.53 m/s RMSE achieved with the SRB policy alone, and a Trot Yaw Rate RMSE of 0.11 rad/s, improved from 0.29 rad/s with the SRB policy alone.

Advanced locomotion control leverages efficient trajectory optimization methods, specifically Linear Inverted Pendulum Trajectory Optimization (LIPTO) and Bezier Spline Reduced Basis Trajectory Optimization (Bezier SRBTO), further enhanced by hierarchical frameworks for trajectory refinement. Implementation of these techniques has yielded a Trot Velocity Tracking Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.28 m/s, representing a significant improvement over the 0.53 m/s RMSE achieved with the Spline Reduced Basis (SRB) policy independently. Similarly, Trot Yaw Rate RMSE was reduced from 0.29 rad/s with the SRB policy alone to 0.11 rad/s when utilizing the combined optimization and hierarchical refinement approach.

A transferred policy demonstrated superior trot velocity tracking accuracy-achieving RMSEs of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0.28</span> m/s and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0.11</span> rad/s for velocity and yaw rate, respectively-and successfully executed backflips with stable base orientation and coordinated leg movements.
A transferred policy demonstrated superior trot velocity tracking accuracy-achieving RMSEs of 0.28 m/s and 0.11 rad/s for velocity and yaw rate, respectively-and successfully executed backflips with stable base orientation and coordinated leg movements.

The Long Con: Toward Robots That Actually Adapt

Recent advancements in robotics are dramatically expanding the capabilities of robot locomotion through a combination of streamlined methodologies. Researchers are increasingly employing simplified models – abstract representations of complex systems – to reduce computational burden and accelerate development. This is often coupled with transfer learning, where knowledge gained from simulating one robotic platform or environment is applied to new, unseen scenarios. Furthermore, the implementation of robust control techniques – algorithms designed to maintain stability and accuracy despite disturbances – is proving critical. These combined strategies allow robots to navigate increasingly complex terrains and perform dynamic maneuvers with greater efficiency and reliability, ultimately pushing the boundaries of what’s achievable in automated movement and opening doors to more versatile robotic applications.

Contact Implicit Model Predictive Control (MPC) represents a significant refinement of traditional trajectory optimization techniques, specifically designed to address the inherent difficulties in managing robotic contact dynamics. Standard MPC often struggles with the complexities of maintaining stable and precise contact with surfaces, requiring computationally expensive and sometimes impractical explicit modeling of these interactions. Contact Implicit MPC cleverly circumvents this issue by implicitly incorporating contact constraints into the optimization process, treating contact as a natural consequence of the robot’s motion rather than a condition that needs to be actively enforced. This approach allows for more robust and efficient planning, particularly in scenarios involving complex terrains, uncertain contact forces, or dynamic disturbances, ultimately enabling robots to navigate and manipulate objects with greater agility and reliability.

Recent progress in robotic locomotion is poised to dramatically expand the scope of tasks robots can reliably perform in unstructured, real-world settings. Beyond simply walking or rolling, these advancements are enabling agile navigation through cluttered environments, allowing robots to traverse difficult terrain and adapt to unexpected obstacles. Simultaneously, improvements in manipulation capabilities are facilitating increasingly complex object interactions, moving beyond pre-programmed routines towards dexterous handling and fine motor control. This convergence of improved locomotion and manipulation promises to unlock applications ranging from search and rescue operations and disaster response to advanced manufacturing and in-home assistance, ultimately blurring the lines between robotic assistance and true autonomous operation.

True robotic autonomy hinges not simply on executing pre-programmed actions, but on a system’s capacity to dynamically respond to the unpredictable nature of real-world environments. Maintaining stability when confronted with unforeseen disturbances – a slippery surface, an unexpected obstacle, or even a gentle nudge – demands sophisticated control algorithms and robust physical designs. Researchers are concentrating on methods that allow robots to perceive changes in their surroundings and instantaneously adjust their movements, effectively ‘learning’ to balance and navigate through uncertainty. This adaptive capability extends beyond simple obstacle avoidance; it is fundamental to achieving versatile locomotion, enabling robots to transition seamlessly between diverse terrains and perform intricate tasks requiring nuanced adjustments in balance and force – ultimately paving the way for robots that can operate reliably and independently in complex, dynamic settings.

This contact plan demonstrates how wall assistance enables stable and efficient robot motions.
This contact plan demonstrates how wall assistance enables stable and efficient robot motions.

The pursuit of elegant dynamic locomotion, as detailed in this work, feels predictably optimistic. They’ve built a framework, Model Homotopy Transfer, to smooth the transition from simplified models to full-body dynamics – a neat trick, certainly. But one suspects the real world, with its unpredictable terrain and sensor noise, will introduce complexities not accounted for in the simulations. As Paul Erdős once said, ‘A mathematician knows all there is to know about a finite number of things.’ This paper meticulously addresses a finite set of dynamic challenges, yet the moment it leaves the lab, it’ll be wrestling with an infinite number of edge cases. They’ll call it ‘robustness’ and ask for more funding, naturally. It began, no doubt, as a simple bash script.

What’s Next?

The elegance of Model Homotopy Transfer – a smoothed transition from simplification to complexity – invites the inevitable. Every abstraction dies in production, and this one will be no different. While the framework demonstrably eases the burden of transferring learned policies, the real world presents contact dynamics that are rarely ‘smooth’ and almost never fully captured by any model, however progressively refined. The question isn’t if a previously unseen terrain or unexpected disturbance will unravel the carefully constructed homotopy, but when, and with what spectacular failure mode.

Future work will undoubtedly focus on robustness – layering defenses against the inherent messiness of reality. Expect to see attempts to incorporate online adaptation, perhaps leveraging meta-learning to anticipate and mitigate deviations from the nominal homotopy path. But a more fundamental challenge remains: the implicit assumption that ‘generalizable’ locomotion is even achievable. Legged robots, unlike their wheeled counterparts, operate at the edge of stability; a small perturbation can trigger a cascade of failures.

Ultimately, the field may need to accept that truly robust legged locomotion isn’t about crafting the perfect model, but about designing systems that can gracefully recover from inevitable crashes. Everything deployable will eventually crash; the art lies in ensuring that the fall is not catastrophic, and that the robot can, perhaps with a sigh, pick itself up and continue.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.24698.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-02 20:07