Beyond Text: Why Speech Holds the Key to Understanding Language

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A growing body of research suggests that focusing on audio-based deep learning models offers a more complete picture of human language processing than current text-based approaches.

This review argues that speech-based deep learning models better capture crucial linguistic information – including phonetics, phonology, and bidirectional processing – often lost in textual representations.

While large language models offer exciting new avenues for studying language, a reliance on text-based approaches risks overlooking fundamental aspects of human communication. In their target article, ‘Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning models’, Futrell and Mahowald highlight a critical disconnect between current deep learning technologies and linguistic theory. We argue that focusing on audio-based models-which capture the rich, multi-dimensional signal of speech-is essential for unlocking a more comprehensive understanding of linguistic structure and processing. Can a shift towards speech-based deep learning finally bridge the gap between computational modeling and the complexities of human language use?

The Fragile Signal: Decoding the Stream of Speech

Conventional speech recognition systems frequently operate by breaking down the continuous stream of spoken language into discrete units – phonemes or even smaller segments – a process that inadvertently discards vital information embedded within the signal. This simplification neglects the nuanced phonetic details – subtle variations in articulation and acoustic properties – and, critically, the prosodic cues like intonation, rhythm, and stress that contribute significantly to meaning. While computationally efficient, this discretization can lead to misinterpretations, particularly in challenging listening conditions such as background noise or when encountering speakers with diverse accents. The loss of these continuous features hinders the system’s ability to accurately perceive and interpret the full communicative intent of the speaker, as the original signal’s richness is diminished before analysis even begins.

The discretization of continuous speech – breaking it down into isolated units for processing – presents significant challenges to accurate perception, particularly when external factors interfere. Background noise, for instance, obscures subtle acoustic cues vital for distinguishing phonemes, leading to misinterpretations. Similarly, variations in accent or speaking style alter these cues, making it difficult for systems trained on a specific speech pattern to generalize effectively. This is because the simplified representations often discard the nuanced phonetic details and prosodic features – rhythm, stress, and intonation – that provide crucial contextual information. Consequently, speech recognition systems can struggle to reliably transcribe speech in real-world conditions, highlighting the need for more robust and adaptable models capable of handling the inherent complexities and variability of human communication.

Initial forays into computational speech modeling, exemplified by connectionist approaches, faced significant hurdles in replicating human auditory perception. These early systems often relied on discretizing the continuous speech waveform into isolated phonetic segments, a process that inadvertently stripped away vital acoustic information. The nuanced interplay of coarticulation – where sounds blend together – and prosodic features like intonation and rhythm were largely lost in this simplification. Consequently, these models struggled with variability in speech – different speakers, accents, or even emotional states – leading to brittle performance and limited real-world applicability. While innovative for their time, these early connectionist networks demonstrated the immense difficulty in capturing the full complexity and continuous nature of the human speech signal, paving the way for more sophisticated approaches that prioritized retaining a greater degree of acoustic detail.

The human capacity to decipher spoken language isn’t merely about recognizing sounds; it fundamentally depends on an intricate grasp of linguistic structure. This encompasses both phonetics – the study of speech sounds themselves, their physical properties, and how they are produced – and phonology, which examines how these sounds are organized and patterned within a given language. The challenge lies in the inherent complexities of this system: sounds are rarely pronounced in isolation, but rather blend and coarticulate with neighboring sounds, creating a continuous stream of acoustic information. Furthermore, subtle variations in pronunciation, influenced by factors like accent, speaking rate, and emotional state, demand a flexible and nuanced perceptual system. A successful model of speech perception, therefore, must move beyond simple sound identification and account for these dynamic and multifaceted layers of linguistic organization to accurately interpret the intended message.

Beyond Discretization: Embracing the Continuity of Sound

Contemporary speech modeling increasingly utilizes Speech-Based Deep Learning Models that operate directly on the continuous audio waveform, bypassing the need for feature engineering typically associated with traditional methods like Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs). These models, often employing architectures such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), ingest raw audio samples as input. This approach allows the model to learn representations directly from the signal, potentially capturing finer-grained acoustic details and temporal dependencies not readily available in hand-crafted features. Processing the continuous waveform necessitates handling variable-length inputs, commonly achieved through techniques like padding or bucketing, and requires significantly greater computational resources compared to processing discrete features.

Modern speech models prioritize the extraction of nuanced acoustic features to replicate human auditory processing, a concept termed ‘Perceptual Learning’. This approach moves beyond traditional feature engineering, such as Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), to directly learn representations sensitive to subtle variations in timbre, prosody, and articulation. These learned representations aim to capture the perceptual categories humans use when differentiating speech sounds, even under conditions of noise or speaker variability. Consequently, the models are designed to be sensitive to acoustic cues that are biologically relevant to human speech perception, improving performance in tasks such as speech recognition and speaker identification, and potentially yielding insights into the mechanisms of human auditory processing.

Self-supervised speech foundation models represent a shift in speech processing by utilizing large volumes of unlabeled audio data for training. Unlike traditional supervised methods requiring extensive manual annotation, these models learn speech representations by predicting masked or future audio segments, thereby constructing robust internal models of speech characteristics. Notably, these models can achieve meaningful linguistic insights and perform competitively on downstream tasks – such as speech recognition or speaker identification – even with training datasets containing less than 1000 hours of speech. This efficiency stems from the models’ ability to extract inherent patterns and structures directly from the raw audio signal, minimizing reliance on labeled examples.

Inductive biases in self-supervised speech foundation models represent pre-programmed assumptions about the structure of speech data, designed to constrain the learning process and enhance generalization performance. These biases are implemented through architectural choices, such as convolutional layers exploiting the local correlations in spectrograms, or the use of masking strategies that encourage models to predict missing segments of audio. Specifically, biases can enforce assumptions about temporal dependencies, spectral characteristics, or the statistical properties of phonetic units. By incorporating these prior beliefs, models require less data to achieve comparable or superior results, and demonstrate improved robustness to variations in accent, recording conditions, and speaker characteristics. The effective selection of inductive biases is crucial for optimizing model performance and efficiency.

Beyond the Signal: The Dance of Meaning and Context

Human language comprehension extends beyond the acoustic signal and lexical access; it’s a constructive process heavily influenced by pragmatic principles, most notably Grice’s Maxims. These maxims – quality (truthfulness), quantity (informativeness), relevance, and manner (clarity) – represent conversational assumptions that guide both speakers and listeners. Listeners actively infer meaning, not just decoding what is said, but also what is intended by the speaker, filling in gaps and resolving ambiguities based on these assumed principles of cooperative communication. This dynamic interpretation suggests language processing isn’t a passive reception of data, but an active construction of meaning predicated on these implicit conversational rules.

Grice’s Maxims – quality, quantity, relevance, and manner – establish cooperative principles fundamental to human communication and significantly impact bidirectional processing in language models. These maxims posit that speakers aim to provide informative, truthful, and relevant contributions, expressed clearly and unambiguously. Bidirectional processing, where context from both preceding and subsequent text influences interpretation, relies on these assumed principles; a model accurately processing language must account for these implicit conversational rules to resolve ambiguities and infer meaning beyond the literal signal. Failure to adhere to or recognize these maxims results in miscommunication, indicating a lack of true language understanding, as the model cannot reliably interpret intent or context.

Researchers utilize both Minimal Pair Tests and Representational Probes to evaluate the degree to which language models demonstrate genuine speech understanding. Minimal Pair Tests present models with pairs of words differing by only one phonetic feature – such as “pat” and “bat” – to assess their ability to discern subtle acoustic distinctions crucial for accurate comprehension. Representational Probes, conversely, examine the internal representations within the model – specifically, the activation patterns in its hidden layers – to determine if and how linguistic information, such as part-of-speech or semantic roles, is encoded during processing. By analyzing these internal states, researchers can infer whether the model is merely performing pattern matching or is capturing meaningful linguistic structure.

Minimal pair tests and representational probes are employed to evaluate the linguistic capabilities of language models by assessing their sensitivity to nuanced auditory distinctions. Minimal pair tests present stimuli differing by a single phonetic feature – for example, ‘pin’ versus ‘bin’ – to determine if the model can reliably differentiate them, indicating phonetic awareness. Representational probes, conversely, analyze the internal activations of a model when processing language; these probes correlate the model’s internal states with specific linguistic features like part-of-speech or semantic roles. Successful correlation demonstrates that the model has encoded relevant linguistic information within its parameters, providing insight into how the model processes language, beyond simply achieving task accuracy.

The Echo of Progress: Shaping the Future of Speech Technology

Current speech recognition technology often relies on processing audio in short, discrete segments, creating a fragmented experience for users and hindering accuracy. A pivotal shift towards continuous speech modeling aims to overcome these limitations by enabling systems to analyze entire utterances without artificial pauses. This approach, leveraging advancements in deep learning and sequence modeling, allows algorithms to capture the natural flow and coarticulation inherent in human speech. Consequently, systems built on continuous modeling demonstrate enhanced robustness to variations in speaking rate, accent, and background noise, promising a more fluid and reliable interaction for applications ranging from hands-free device control to real-time transcription. The move promises not just improved accuracy, but a step towards systems that truly ‘understand’ speech.

The development of truly human-like conversational agents hinges on a deeper understanding of how artificial intelligence models internally represent linguistic structure. Current systems often process speech as a sequence of sounds, lacking an appreciation for the hierarchical organization of language – the way words combine into phrases, phrases into clauses, and clauses into coherent sentences. Researchers are actively investigating how these models encode grammatical relationships, semantic roles, and long-range dependencies within text. By mirroring the human capacity to parse and interpret language based on its underlying structure, future agents will be capable of more nuanced responses, improved contextual understanding, and a greater ability to engage in natural, flowing conversations – moving beyond simple keyword recognition towards genuine dialogue.

The anticipated improvements in speech technology hold significant promise for a wide range of practical applications, fundamentally altering how individuals interact with technology and each other. For those with disabilities, more accurate speech recognition translates directly into enhanced accessibility tools, offering greater independence through voice-controlled interfaces and streamlined communication. Simultaneously, the development of more nuanced and context-aware voice assistants moves beyond simple command execution, enabling genuinely helpful and intuitive interactions. Perhaps most globally impactful is the potential for better language translation; refined speech models can bridge communication gaps, fostering collaboration and understanding across linguistic boundaries and opening up new possibilities for international exchange and access to information.

The progression of speech technologies hinges on moving beyond simply recognizing words to genuinely understanding meaning, and future investigations are increasingly centered on equipping models with the ability to interpret contextual cues and apply common-sense reasoning. Current systems often struggle with ambiguity or nuances that humans effortlessly resolve, requiring an integration of world knowledge and inferential capabilities. Researchers are exploring methods to imbue these models with a richer understanding of situations, relationships, and expectations – essentially, teaching them to ‘read between the lines’ as humans do. This involves not only processing linguistic data but also incorporating external knowledge bases and developing algorithms that can simulate reasoning processes, ultimately striving for systems capable of discerning intent, handling complex dialogues, and responding with truly intelligent and contextually appropriate outputs.

The pursuit of understanding linguistic structure, as detailed in the paper, reveals a system constantly decaying from its original signal – speech. This degradation is inherent, not a flaw, but a step toward maturity. As Claude Shannon aptly stated, “The most important thing in communication is to convey the meaning, not the message.” The article champions a return to audio-based models, recognizing that the nuances of speech – phonetics and phonology – contain vital information lost when transcribed to text. These models, by grappling with the raw signal, acknowledge the inevitable ‘noise’ inherent in communication, and attempt to extract meaning despite it – a graceful aging of the system itself, accepting imperfection as a feature, not a bug. The focus on bidirectional processing acknowledges time’s passage, allowing the system to learn from the echoes of past signals.

The Echo Remains

The shift advocated for-a focus on audio-based deep learning-isn’t merely a change in input modality; it’s an acknowledgement that transcription itself is a lossy compression. Each iteration of linguistic theory, each carefully constructed syntactic tree, rests upon a foundation of vanished acoustic detail. Every commit is a record in the annals, and every version a chapter, but the original signal degrades with each rendering into discrete symbols. The challenge, then, isn’t simply to build better models, but to devise representational probes sensitive enough to recover what has been systematically discarded.

Further progress will likely demand a rethinking of bidirectional processing. Current models, even those embracing audio, often treat forward and reverse contexts as distinct streams. However, the human auditory system operates with an inherent temporal holism; the echo of a phoneme shapes its perception. To truly capture linguistic structure, models must learn to represent not just what was said, but how it unfolded in time – a subtle but crucial distinction.

Delaying fixes is a tax on ambition. The field has, for decades, operated under the assumption that language is best understood through its written form. To now fully embrace the complexities of speech, to acknowledge the information lost in translation to text, requires a willingness to revisit fundamental assumptions and accept that the path forward will be messier, more nuanced, and far more computationally demanding.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14506.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-17 15:18