Coding with a Feeling: How Generative AI is Democratizing Software Creation

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new educational approach using generative AI tools-dubbed ‘vibe coding’-is proving remarkably effective at bridging the gap for novice programmers and fostering rapid prototyping.

The exploration leverages generative artificial intelligence to investigate conceptual spaces, demonstrating a capacity for idea generation and refinement.

This paper details a successful hackathon demonstrating the inclusive potential of ‘vibe coding’ for software engineering education and AI literacy.

While democratizing software development is often touted as a benefit of AI-assisted coding, its practical impact on novice programmers remains largely unexplored. This paper, titled “Can you feel the vibes?”: An exploration of novice programmer engagement with vibe coding, reports on a one-day hackathon investigating how participants from diverse backgrounds engage with generative AI tools for rapid prototyping. Findings reveal that ‘vibe coding’ fostered cross-disciplinary collaboration and prompt engineering skills, yet also highlighted challenges related to code quality and critical evaluation of AI outputs. Could short-format, scaffolded hackathons serve as effective low-stakes environments for building AI literacy and reimagining software engineering education?

The Inevitable Erosion of Traditional Software Paradigms

The conventional software development lifecycle, predicated on meticulous planning and rigid execution, increasingly strains under the weight of modern demands. Projects now navigate a landscape of perpetually shifting requirements and escalating complexity, rendering traditional coding methods – often characterized by lengthy development cycles and cumbersome revision processes – progressively inefficient. This struggle isn’t merely a matter of speed; the inherent inflexibility of established approaches can lead to costly rework, frustrated teams, and ultimately, products that fail to adequately address evolving user needs. As systems become more interconnected and user expectations continue to rise, the limitations of painstakingly crafted, line-by-line code are becoming acutely apparent, creating a critical need for more adaptable and responsive development paradigms.

Vibe Coding represents a significant departure from traditional software development by utilizing the power of Generative AI to translate natural language instructions directly into functional code. This innovative approach bypasses the limitations of manual coding, allowing developers to articulate desired outcomes in plain language rather than meticulously crafting each line of code. The resulting increase in agility stems from the ability to rapidly iterate on ideas and adapt to evolving project requirements; changes are implemented by simply refining the natural language prompt, triggering a new code generation. Consequently, Vibe Coding dramatically accelerates the development process, reducing time-to-market and enabling faster responses to dynamic user needs, potentially reshaping how software is conceived and built.

The efficacy of Vibe Coding isn’t simply about deploying Generative AI; it fundamentally depends on the precision of Prompt Engineering. This emerging discipline involves crafting natural language instructions – the “prompts” – that effectively communicate the desired functionality to the AI model. A well-engineered prompt acts as a blueprint, guiding the AI to generate code that is not only syntactically correct but also aligns with the project’s specific requirements and intended behavior. Consequently, skilled Prompt Engineers must possess a deep understanding of both the programming task at hand and the nuances of the AI’s language processing capabilities, iteratively refining prompts to overcome ambiguity and unlock the full potential of AI-driven code generation. The art lies in translating complex technical specifications into clear, concise, and unambiguous language that the AI can readily interpret and execute, ultimately determining the quality and efficiency of the resulting code.

Teams commonly utilize a multi-stage pipeline encompassing data engineering, model training, deployment, and monitoring for successful AI implementation.

Accelerated Prototyping Through Time-Constrained Iteration

Hackathons are events characterized by a limited duration, typically ranging from 24 to 48 hours, during which teams concentrate on the rapid development of software prototypes. This time constraint encourages participants to prioritize functional implementation over exhaustive planning and refinement. The methodology employed, Vibe Coding, emphasizes iterative development and direct translation of conceptual ideas into working code. This approach facilitates quick experimentation and allows teams to bypass lengthy design phases, resulting in a demonstrable prototype within the event timeframe. The compressed schedule and focus on immediate results distinguish hackathons from traditional software development cycles.

Hackathons actively promote cross-disciplinary collaboration by assembling teams with varied skillsets and academic backgrounds. This intentional mixing of expertise – encompassing fields beyond computer science, such as design, marketing, and even non-technical disciplines – facilitates a broader approach to problem-solving. The resulting diverse perspectives can identify innovative solutions that might be overlooked by homogenous teams, leading to more comprehensive and user-centered product development. Recent events, like one study involving 31 participants including 4 non-computing students, demonstrate a successful integration of diverse backgrounds within the hackathon format, highlighting the potential for novel insights and increased creativity.

Replit and the Theme Generator App are utilized to reduce the operational overhead typically associated with hackathons, allowing participants to concentrate on project development. Replit provides a browser-based integrated development environment (IDE) that eliminates the need for local environment setup and configuration, while the Theme Generator App simplifies the creation of user interfaces. This combination minimizes time spent on infrastructure concerns – such as dependency management, version control, and deployment – and maximizes the time available for ideation, coding, and testing. By abstracting away these complexities, these tools facilitate rapid prototyping and encourage a focus on innovative solutions.

Psychological safety is a critical component of successful hackathons, directly impacting a team’s willingness to experiment and propose unconventional solutions. Recent research indicates a viable hackathon model can be implemented within a single day, broadening participation beyond traditional computing fields. A study of one such event demonstrated inclusivity, with 4 participants explicitly identified as non-computing students among a total participant count of 31, suggesting a focused environment can mitigate barriers to entry and encourage diverse contributions.

Empirical Validation: AI-Assisted Code Generation in Practice

The integration of AI-powered code editors – including Cursor, Copilot, V0, and Lovable – with large language models like Claude has demonstrably increased the velocity of Vibe Coding workflows. These tools automate code generation, suggest completions, and facilitate rapid prototyping by translating natural language prompts into functional code. Observed implementations detail a significant reduction in time-to-prototype, with teams reporting accelerated development cycles due to the AI’s ability to handle boilerplate code and suggest solutions to common programming challenges. The tools function not as autonomous coders, but as interactive assistants that respond to iterative refinement of prompts and require developer input for contextual accuracy and complex logic.

AI-powered coding tools such as Cursor, Copilot, V0, and Lovable function as developer assistants, not autonomous replacements. Their effectiveness is directly correlated with the quality of the prompts provided; ambiguous or poorly defined requests yield suboptimal results. Successful implementation necessitates a skillset focused on prompt engineering – the ability to articulate desired functionality with precision and clarity. These tools excel at translating well-defined instructions into code, but require human developers to oversee logic, address edge cases, and ensure alignment with overall project goals. Consequently, developer effort shifts from writing code directly to refining prompts and validating AI-generated output.

Despite the acceleration of prototyping through AI-assisted coding, maintaining code quality and long-term maintainability remains paramount. Teams utilizing tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Claude consistently employed human review processes to validate AI-generated code, ensuring adherence to established coding standards and architectural principles. A typical workflow involved a multi-stage pipeline where AI tools facilitated rapid initial development, followed by manual code review, unit testing, and integration testing to identify and correct potential issues. This approach allowed teams to leverage the speed of AI while mitigating the risk of introducing technical debt or compromising code integrity, ultimately enabling sustainable development practices.

Designing for Societal Benefit: A New Imperative

The landscape of hackathons is undergoing a notable shift, increasingly driven by the principles of Vibe Coding and a pronounced emphasis on projects that deliver measurable Social Impact. These events are no longer solely focused on technological prowess; instead, participants are actively tackling real-world challenges, developing solutions addressing issues like accessibility, environmental sustainability, and public health. This trend reflects a growing recognition that technology’s true potential lies in its ability to create positive change, with hackathons serving as incubators for innovation geared towards the greater good. The resulting projects are often characterized by their practicality and immediate applicability, fostering a sense of purpose and empowering participants to contribute meaningfully to society.

Inclusive Design represents a fundamental shift in how technological solutions are conceived and implemented, prioritizing accessibility and benefit for all potential users, regardless of ability, background, or circumstance. This principle moves beyond simply accommodating users after a product is developed, instead advocating for their active involvement throughout the entire design process. By considering a wide range of needs and perspectives from the outset – encompassing factors like cognitive differences, physical limitations, and socioeconomic disparities – developers can create solutions that are not only usable by a broader audience, but also demonstrably more effective and equitable. This approach frequently involves techniques like universal design principles, participatory design workshops, and rigorous usability testing with diverse user groups, ultimately fostering innovation that truly addresses the needs of a multifaceted world.

The acceleration of design cycles is now significantly enabled by generative artificial intelligence, allowing for the creation of rapid prototypes that directly address user needs. This technology moves beyond simple mock-ups, generating functional, albeit preliminary, versions of solutions at an unprecedented pace. These prototypes aren’t meant to be final products, but rather tools for gathering crucial feedback from diverse user groups, identifying usability issues, and refining designs through iterative improvements. This process, fueled by AI’s ability to quickly translate concepts into tangible forms, drastically reduces development time and cost, while simultaneously increasing the likelihood of creating truly user-centered and effective solutions. The ability to test and adapt based on real-world input, rather than assumptions, is proving to be a key differentiator in impactful design initiatives.

The convergence of technological advancement and human-centered design offers unprecedented potential for addressing complex societal issues. Recent initiatives demonstrate that innovation isn’t solely about creating novel tools, but about strategically applying them to meet genuine human needs. Participants in these endeavors are notably driven by intrinsic motivation; survey data reveals that the enjoyment of the process and the appeal of working on compelling projects are primary factors in their engagement. This suggests that fostering a positive and stimulating environment is crucial for harnessing the power of technology for social good, moving beyond purely functional outcomes to create solutions that are both effective and deeply satisfying to those who contribute to their development.

The exploration of ‘vibe coding’ within the hackathon context highlights a fascinating shift in software development pedagogy. It necessitates a focus on clear articulation of desired outcomes – a principle deeply resonant with formal computation. As Alan Turing stated, “This is only a means of bringing into being those implications which are inherent in the axioms.” The hackathon’s success stems from participants defining the ‘vibe’ – the desired application behavior – before implementation. This mirrors Turing’s emphasis on foundational axioms; a well-defined ‘vibe’ functions as the axiomatic basis for the generative AI to construct the software, ensuring a provable connection between intent and outcome, rather than relying on empirical testing alone. The study reveals that even novice programmers can leverage these tools effectively with this clearly defined approach.

Where Do the Currents Lead?

The reported success of this ‘vibe coding’ hackathon, while encouraging, sidesteps a fundamental question. Let N approach infinity – what remains invariant? The enthusiastic engagement observed is, itself, a transient phenomenon. The novelty of generative AI as a rapid prototyping tool will inevitably wane. The crucial test lies not in immediate participation, but in the lasting impact on algorithmic thinking. Does ‘vibe coding’ foster a deeper understanding of computational principles, or merely an increased facility with prompting a black box?

Future work must move beyond documenting anecdotal success and grapple with the issue of provability. Can students, after such an experience, reliably verify the correctness of the code generated by these tools? Or are they left with a superficial understanding, reliant on empirical testing rather than logical deduction? The field requires rigorous, longitudinal studies tracking the development of core software engineering skills, not just hackathon output.

Furthermore, the implicit assumption that ‘ease of use’ equates to ‘inclusive design’ deserves scrutiny. While lowering the initial barrier to entry is commendable, true inclusivity demands addressing the systemic factors that discourage participation in computer science. A fleeting moment of ‘vibing’ with AI is insufficient. The challenge remains: how to cultivate a truly equitable and sustainable pipeline of algorithmic thinkers.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.02750.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

The Inevitable Erosion of Traditional Software Paradigms

Accelerated Prototyping Through Time-Constrained Iteration

Empirical Validation: AI-Assisted Code Generation in Practice

Designing for Societal Benefit: A New Imperative

Where Do the Currents Lead?

See also: