It’s been disclosed today that Taylor Swift will take the stand and provide testimony under oath in an unusual legal dispute involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.
Recently acquired court records, as reported by The Daily Mail, indicate that the popular musician has been invited for a deposition following the upcoming release of their new album next month.
In the early part of this year, a judge decided that Mr. Baldoni was allowed to access text conversations between Swift and Lively that were related to the novel ‘It Ends With Us’.
The singer might be taken for questioning starting from the first week of October 20, but this will happen only if Justin’s lawyers manage to convince a judge to extend the deadline.
The actress known for her role in Gossip Girl is taking legal action against Baldoni, claiming sexual harassment and the creation of a harmful work environment. These charges, which he vehemently denies, have been dropped. His lawsuit against her for civil extortion and slander has been thrown out.
In a somewhat unfortunate turn of events, Ms. Swift, who serves as the godmother to one of Blake and Ryan Reynolds’ children, finds herself unwittingly involved in the contentious legal dispute between Blake Lively and the actor-director, Baldoni.
According to a recent report by The Daily Mail, it’s said that Taylor Swift, who recently got engaged, has been ignoring repeated efforts by Blake Lively to contact her via text messages, voice messages, and emails.
On Tuesday, Taylor Swift’s announcement of her engagement to Travis Kelce received an outpouring of congratulatory messages from her famous peers, yet there was no apparent response from Blake in the public domain.
Now, Justin Baldoni’s legal representatives have stated that Taylor has received a notice for a deposition scheduled approximately one month from now.
As a result they opposed a motion setting a deadline on when they can gather evidence.
In simpler terms, Ellyn S. Garofalo, Baldoni’s lawyer, wrote to Judge Lewis J. Liman that Ms. Lively suggests falsely that the Wayfarer Parties are asking for a thirty-day extension covering all discovery deadlines.
‘The Wayfarer Parties asked for an agreement that would allow them to question Taylor Swift between October 20th and 25th, as she had previous work commitments.’
The pair saw their decade-long friendship spectacularly collapse earlier this year.
Earlier this month, it was disclosed by an insider that Lively, aged 38, has ultimately acknowledged that their relationship has ended, if temporarily.
In June, it was reported by the Daily Mail that Swift had been ignoring Lively’s multiple efforts to contact her through texts, voice messages, and emails, hoping to reconcile their past relationship.
Now, Lively has given up trying.
According to a confidant, Blake did not respond after the engagement announcement and has no plans to do so. The source further stated, “Now is not the right moment.
The source stated, “Why bother contacting now? It’s entirely unnecessary since Lively has more pressing matters to attend to.
The actress seems to no longer discuss Taylor at all and finds it unproductive to ponder over what might have transpired between them.
In previous conversations, we often discussed various aspects related to her involvement in the wedding, such as plans, expectations, and potential outcomes. However, now there seems to be an unwelcome silence on the matter. As for Blake, it appears she won’t be part of the wedding anymore, and it seems she has no desire to discuss this topic further.
A few days later, it was revealed that Mr. Baldoni is under more investigation due to additional allegations of harassment from another person.
In a recent affidavit submitted by Blake Lively’s legal representative, an unnamed person claimed to have experienced numerous instances of negative encounters with Mr. Baldoni and his team, which included verbally abusive behavior from Mr. Baldoni himself.
The individual added that Baldoni was largely barred from the filming location throughout most of the production period, due to his past encounters.
Besides what was mentioned, the person added that they asked for Baldoni to stay away from marketing and public relations tasks.
A source told TMZ that the individual is ‘likely to testify against Justin in Lively’s trial.’
Even though the statement doesn’t directly involve “It Ends with Us,” the person making the accusation mentioned that they had worked together with Baldoni in a past collaboration unrelated to “Wayfarer Studios.
The filing mentions Baldoni’s business partner, Steve Sarowitz who is one of the co-founders at Wayfarer. It implies that the accuser was contacted by Sarowitz’s assistant for scheduling a meeting, but there was no specified agenda provided for the discussion.
The documents, filed September 4, 2025, were submitted under penalty of perjury.
At the moment, we haven’t received a response from Baldoni’s team following our request for comment from The Daily Mail.
New accusations have emerged, coinciding with Lively filing a broad request for legal fees, triple compensatory damages, and punitive damages aimed at Baldoni’s company, Wayfarer Studios, and its top management.
In a 30-page document submitted to federal court, Lively’s legal team contends that the defamation claim made by Wayfarer against her was unfounded right from the beginning and can be seen as a reprisal following her complaints about harassment and retaliation.
The motion alleges that the company is trying to undermine her reputation and hide their own illegal actions by submitting heavily-redacted evidence and launching personal attacks on her character, in court records accessible to the public.
The team asserts that the behavior falls directly within the scope of what California Civil Code Section 47.1 aims to prohibit – reprisal lawsuits directed at individuals who report instances of harassment.
According to that law, Lively is seeking the court to levy hefty fines, such as triple damages and additional punitive damages, and to declare her as the winning party who can claim back attorney fees.
In my expertise, I’d like to emphasize a point that surfaces in reports about potential hostile actions. It seems there are allegations against an individual named Sarowitz, who is said to have made serious threats. The claims suggest he has vowed to invest a staggering $100 million with the intention of causing significant harm to the lives of Blake Lively and her partner, Ryan Reynolds.
In the filing, it is claimed that Sarowitz made a statement comparing his protective measures to Israel’s defense against Hamas, stating: “I will secure the studio as thoroughly as Israel secured itself from Hamas. There will be no more than two individuals left unaccounted for once I’m done. They won’t be dead per se, but more like ‘you no longer exist in my book.’ Essentially, dead to many others.
Baldoni and Lively has been embroiled in a legal battle for months.
In December 2024, Blake, an actress, filed a lawsuit against Justin, alleging that he had inappropriately harassed her on set. However, Justin disputed these claims. Subsequently, Justin and Wayfarer Studios retaliated by filing a defamation suit not only against Blake but also against her publicist Leslie Sloane and her husband Ryan Reynolds.
Besides engaging in conflict, Justin initiated a legal battle valued at $250 million against The New York Times on December 31, 2024, due to their explosive exposé regarding Lively’s allegations of sexual harassment by her ex-colleague.
The New York Times denied the allegations.
On June 9th, it became known that a judge had thrown out Baldoni’s lawsuit, dealing a significant blow to the actor’s aspirations for a massive victory against the wealthy actress.
In simpler terms, the judge, Lewis J. Liman, threw out Baldoni’s lawsuit claiming defamation and extortion because all of Lively’s accusations were part of legal documents protected by privilege.
According to an order acquired by DailyMail.com, the judge stated that the ‘Wayfarer Parties haven’t accused Lively of being accountable for any statements beyond those made in her CRD complaint, which carry a privilege.’
The Wayfarer Groups claim that both Reynolds and Sloane, along with others, made extra comments implying sexual misconduct by Baldoni, and that The Times published additional pieces suggesting the Wayfarer Groups were involved in a defamatory campaign.
As a die-hard fan, I must clarify something: The Wayfarer Parties haven’t claimed that Reynolds, Sloane, or The Times would’ve had any genuine doubts about these statements being truthful, given the information they possessed. This is crucial because it’s only when such doubts exist that they can be held liable for defamation under the law that applies here.
In response to further arguments made by The Wayfarer Parties, those points are unsuccessful as well. Consequently, it is necessary to reject the entire revised lawsuit, known as the Amended Complaint.
According to the ruling, ‘The Times examined the existing proof and, possibly in an exaggerated style, shared their understanding of what they thought transpired. The Times didn’t seem to have any ulterior motive for supporting Lively’s account of the incident.’
He dismissed the lawsuit against The New York Times as well.
Read More
- Clash Royale Best Boss Bandit Champion decks
- RAVEN2 redeem codes and how to use them (October 2025)
- Ethereum’s Golden Cross: $4,000 Rally? Hold Your Breath!
- ESPN Might Drop Doris Burke From NBA Broadcast Team Next Season
- Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 Gets Trial Experience On PS Plus Premium
- Kingdom Rush Battles Tower Tier List
- Chaos Zero Nightmare Combatant Tier List
- Clash Royale Furnace Evolution best decks guide
- Brawl Stars: Did Sushi Just Get a Makeover? Players React to Event Ending
- Tom Cruise’s Emotional Victory Lap in Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning
2025-09-12 11:34