Italian reporter forced to respond after leaving Hollywood stars horrified with Black Lives Matter question

In simpler, more natural-sounding English, the statement could be:

The Italian journalist, Federica Polidoro, has given a bold reply after an interview with stars Ayo Edebiri, Julia Roberts, and Andrew Garfield from After the Hunt, which sparked controversy due to Polidoro not addressing several relevant questions regarding Edebiri.

In this rephrased version, the individuals mentioned are Julia Roberts, aged 57, Julia Edebiri, aged 29, and Andrew Garfield, aged 42, who appeared as guests on Italy’s ArtsLife TV during a segment moderated by Polidoro.

In the course of our conversation, it seemed as though my interviewer consistently overlooked The Bear’s Black actress when discussing topics such as Black Lives Matter and the #MeToo movement. At a particular moment, they explicitly excluded Edebiri from addressing one such question, creating an uneasy atmosphere.

Polidoro repeatedly steered the conversation toward Roberts and Garfield instead of the Emmy-winning actor, despite being presented with multiple opportunities to do otherwise. This behavior drew criticism from online users.

At some point, Roberts asked Polidoro, “Could you please say that again? I can’t tell who you’re speaking to with those sunglasses on.

Despite being overlooked by the interviewer, Edebiri, recognized with a Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild Awards for her work on the well-known FX series, ultimately responded to one of the questions posed.

In response to the interview clip gaining widespread attention, numerous individuals criticized the journalist for her approach during the group discussion.

Several users in the Reddit discussion forum r/FauxMoi expressed disapproval towards Polidoro’s behavior during the interview with the celebrity threesome.

One asked: ‘Why… would you ask a man about the MeToo movement but purposefully exclude a woman?

Why is it that you’d question Julia Roberts and Andrew Garfield on the topic of BlackLivesMatter, yet overlook Ayo Edebiri in your discussion? This seems rather unusual.

Another user commented that the interview was reflective of racism, to which a commenter agreed.

The user exclaimed, “Such brazen behavior! Even a high-profile celebrity in full view of cameras and spectators would find that audacious remark out of line… what on earth was that question? Ayo clearly outshines me there.

One user praised Garfield for his body language and demeanor amid the uncomfortable segment.

The user commented that ‘Andrew Garfield’s posture of turning fully towards Julia and Ayo to let them respond instead of answering the question himself suggests he recognizes he’s not the right person to address such a question, with a lighthearted chuckle added (lol). I’m thankful it was Andrew Garfield rather than Chris Pratt, as we would have likely endured a lengthy discussion on cancel culture from him.’

Furthermore, Ayo recognized the situation. Eagerly, she longed to intervene as soon as she noticed she was intentionally left out. Despite the circumstances, she retained an impressive amount of poise, yet refused to remain silent. Her love shines brightly.

In an heated post, Polidoro shared with her 19.1K Instagram followers that she had experienced cyberbullying following the interview.

After an interview, I faced derogatory comments and criticisms due to a query that seemed to upset certain individuals in the public,” Polidoro explained.

She went on to say: ‘It’s fascinating how individuals who swiftly label me as racist and claim they uphold justice, seem to tolerate the use of aggressive speech, character assaults, and online harassment.’

Polidoro expressed that she believed the public conversation around the contentious interview was off-target; furthermore, she maintained that she met all necessary professional responsibilities during her participation in the broadcast.

Polidoro stated that while he appreciates the thoughtful answers from Ayo Edebiri, Julia Roberts, and Andrew Garfield, the conversation now centers entirely around rephrasing his original question, as opposed to their responses.

She mentioned that every contribution made by those attending was accurately included in the final interview transcript, with no parts left out.

Polidoro said that she felt that criticisms of her were flimsy – and bordering on pro-censorship.

So far, as Polidorno stated, there’s no established rule requiring a specific sequence for asking questions during an interview. It’s also important to note that suppressing or discrediting questions deemed “awkward” doesn’t align with democratic practices.

‘It is only the Journalists’ Association that has the authority to judge the performance of professionals in this field; social media forums do not have this power.’

Polidoro denied she is racist, speaking about her own background when it comes to the topic.

To individuals who falsely accuse me of racism, let me set the record straight. In my professional endeavors, I’ve had the privilege of interviewing people from all walks of life and diverse ethnicities,” Polidoro explained. “On a personal note, my family is a beautiful tapestry of multiple ethnicities, we lean towards matriarchal traditions, and we embrace feminist ideologies. We also have a rich history of immigration.

I’ve had the privilege of working alongside various domestic and foreign publications spanning diverse political spectrums, for more than two decades now. Throughout this journey, I’ve consistently maintained an open-minded and disciplined approach to my craft.

In my opinion, true prejudice lies with individuals who perceive racism excessively and attempt to censor journalism, thereby stifling open debate, independent thought, and diversity of opinions.

In simpler terms, Polidoro articulated her perspective on her job, stating that journalism involves asking tough questions, even about sensitive subjects, while maintaining both respect and responsibility.

She clarified that she won’t tolerate or accept defamatory or aggressive speech. She also stated that she has the option to pursue legal action against those who, in recent times, have chosen to use the cover of online groups to insult and attack her, rather than engaging in a respectful and productive conversation.

Read More

2025-09-09 04:51