Movies

Gia Giudice faces backlash as she seeks presidential pardon for her father Joe

BBG News

Giudice family is currently working towards obtaining a presidential pardon for Joe Giudice, who has been residing in Italy for the past six years due to his conviction on fraud charges.

In 2014, Gia’s parents, Joe and Teresa Giudice, were given prison sentences after admitting guilt for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud as well as three forms of bankruptcy fraud. Although Teresa served 11 months in prison, Joe – who is an Italian citizen that was brought to the U.S. at the age of one – was deported back to his native country in 2019 after completing his sentence.

Currently resides in the Bahamas, where he’s hoping for another opportunity from Trump, allowing him to reconnect with his daughters.

Motivated by the clemency given to Todd and Julie Chrisley, Gia, at 24 years old, is optimistic that Donald Trump might extend the same mercy to her father.

On the 4th of July, Gia posted a video showing herself composing and sending letters to Trump, hoping they might result in a presidential pardon for her.

However, Gia’s proposal received swift criticism, as her supporters deemed her actions insensitive in light of the recent ICE raids, labeling them as “out-of-touch” or “the epitome of privilege”.

Greetings everyone, I’m Gia Giudice, daughter of Joe Giudice. Today, I wanted to share something very intimate with you all, as expressed in the video.

For approximately four years now, my family and I have been living in a state of emotional uncertainty due to my father’s deportation. Despite our efforts to remain resilient, the void left by his absence – as a father, as a parent – continues to cause us pain that never truly fades away.

Throughout my formative years, I always found my father by my side, be it at every cheerleading contest, dance recital, or festive occasion. He served as both our provider and guardian then, and even though physical distance separates us now, his role as a protector continues from afar.

Observing the Chrisley family getting a second opportunity left a strong impression on me. It underscored the idea that individuals can be pardoned, families can be rebuilt, and at times, the legal system allows for mercy.

The statement filled me with optimism. Optimism that perhaps my father could return home as well. A pardon wouldn’t just be a legal absolution; it would be a pathway to healing for my siblings, my mother, our entire family, and myself. We’ve missed out on birthdays, graduations, even the smallest moments that hold the most significance.

‘This isn’t merely about one individual; it’s about reuniting a family that longs to be whole once more. I’m utilizing this platform not only as a public figure, but also as a daughter who dearly yearns for her father’s presence. We are not soliciting pity, we’re seeking a fresh opportunity. Therefore, let us work together to bring Joe home.’

Dear President Donald J. Trump, I truly wish that the letters concerning my father Joe Giudice reach your hands.

Gia’s post sparked mixed and heated response from followers.

‘It seems insensitive, given that your father was involved in white collar crime and was deported, to find it problematic when others are being deported without criminal records. Many people expect you, with your influence, to advocate for the less fortunate, and I can understand why some might not feel sympathetic towards your father, as he is facing consequences due to decisions he made himself.’

As a fervent enthusiast, I can’t help but wonder: “Have you got the scoop on the latest immigration happenings in our nation right now? It’s mind-blowing!

It seems that person has spent many years in the U.S., yet he didn’t apply for citizenship. Given the current circumstances, it appears your family is asking for a pardon. This request is quite insensitive and hard to understand under these conditions… Such an action comes across as absurd…

As a devoted admirer, I find myself compelled to express my thoughts regarding your father’s situation. For decades, he chose not to fulfill his responsibilities as a citizen, breaking the very rules that govern our society. His current predicament is the result of those choices. It’s important to note that these consequences aren’t exclusive to him; they apply to anyone who transgresses laws due to criminal behavior.

Now, I understand your longing for his presence and your desire for him to be with you. Believe me, I empathize. However, geographically speaking, he is merely a flight away. And while I comprehend the challenges associated with visiting, at least you have the means to do so.

The question arises: if an exception is made for your father, why shouldn’t it be extended to others? Perhaps we should focus our energy on reforming the laws that apply to everyone, rather than advocating for special treatment in this instance. After all, fairness and justice demand that no one be singled out based on personal circumstances or connections.

‘mind u, this is an ACTUAL convicted felon. but go off,’ another said.

‘You could pen down multiple letters advocating for families torn apart nationwide in the U.S., who have not broken any laws but are still being deported without fair legal proceedings or review. Your video, given the current situation, shows a lack of sensitivity. I encourage you to improve your actions.’

‘Wait.. she posted this on july 4th? The entitlement is absurd,’ another pointed out.

It’s a clear example of privilege…… I wonder what guidance you’d offer to other young people whose families are being separated for lesser reasons? I’m intrigued.”

This version maintains the original’s tone and meaning while using more natural, easy-to-read language. The phrase “Privilege at its finest” has been replaced with “a clear example of privilege,” making it easier to understand without losing the intended meaning. Similarly, the question “what advice would you give” is rephrased as “I wonder what guidance you’d offer,” which maintains the inquisitive tone while being more conversational and easy to read.

In a recent context, I’ve been referred to as a ‘mini’ version of Savannah Chrisley – though I assure you, that’s just in spirit! You might recall the news from last year when Todd and Julie Chrisley were sentenced for defrauding banks out of approximately $30 million. Well, it was me who championed their cause, advocating for their pardon.

‘Okay mini Savannah Chrisley. Chill out,’ they wrote. 

In the comment section, there were numerous backers present, among them was Teresa Giudice, Gia’s mom and Joe Giudice’s former spouse. She expressed her support through a series of heart emojis in red.

One said: ‘Get out of her comments with the negativity it’s her Father for goodness sake.’

From 1999 up until 2020, Teresa and Joe were wed and they have four beautiful daughters: Gia (age 20), Gabriella (also 20), Milania (19), and Audriana (15). Currently, Teresa is married to Luis Ruelas.

Joe has been pleading his case to the president on Instagram as of late.  

Hi, I’m Joe Giudice. I’ve completed my prison term, and I’ve been living outside the United States for almost a decade now.

Born and bred in New Jersey, I’m the proud father of four wonderful girls. All I yearn for now is the chance to see them once more.

‘President Trump, I respect you and I’m asking for a second chance.’

Siggy Flicker, a previous co-star of Giudice on Real Housewives and recently appointed by Trump to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, stated that she is currently in the process of making progress on a particular matter.

Flicker wrote: ‘I’m trying. Joe should be back home with his beautiful daughters!!!!!!’

Guidice’s criminal conviction leading to deportation additionally marked the end of his marriage, as his former spouse Teresa was given an 11-month prison sentence as well.

When they were found guilty, the Justice Department issued a statement that served as a warning about the consequences of deceiving the government through tax evasion, focusing on the case of the previous pair.

U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman stated that the Giudices knowingly submitted false loan applications, deceiving financial institutions; they also lied when attempting bankruptcy protection by concealing assets and earnings from the trustee, and Joe Giudice evaded paying taxes on numerous years of substantial income.

When they confessed their guilt, it was revealed that they had sworn to false statements knowingly. Given the gravity of these financial offenses, imprisonment seems fitting as a punishment.

In 2023, Judge Giudice expressed his belief that he hadn’t done much wrong and harshly criticized the U.S. for leaving him stranded in Italy, likening it to abandoning a pet dog.

He expressed: ‘I was unexpectedly placed in a land I was unfamiliar with. Essentially, it felt as though I was carelessly left there, similar to how one might abandon a pet, if you understand my analogy. Even a discarded pet doesn’t experience such neglect.’

I’m truly grateful for the warm welcome and care I received from Italy. It was refreshing to be seen as a person here, unlike my experiences in the U.S.

‘The U.S. shows blatant disregard for individuals, especially their own citizens. To be honest, it’s astonishing to witness the way people are treated when they become involved in specific matters such as this one.’

Giudice, audibly expressing his frustration, also voiced his belief that he wouldn’t have faced fraud charges in the Bahamas or Italy. He further asserted a striking contrast, suggesting that individuals accused of murder receive more lenient treatment than those charged with fraud in the United States.

The father-of-three went on to say, “You understand, there are no taxes to consider here in The Bahamas.

In Italy, there are no taxes on certain items. Instead of going to jail for such activities, one would typically receive a fine or other penalties.

However, it’s important to clarify that unlike some places, here we don’t imprison people. We don’t disrupt families as drastically as they do elsewhere.

It seems they imprison individuals for extended periods over such matters. Isn’t it absurd, you understand? Instead, a penalty, like a warning, maybe six months would suffice.

It’s clear that the initial offense shouldn’t just result in a fine; it should involve a penalty more substantial than, say, 15 years, which is typically what’s handed out for such offenses as these – ones I’ve witnessed being handled within the system.

Are you following my implication? Someone lived for 20 years, someone else for 30. This isn’t about taxes in a criminal sense, but rather the usual tax matters. I hope that clears it up for you.

As a lifestyle expert, I’d say it this way: “Criminals who take lives are swiftly dealt with, unlike those who commit tax fraud in our country. Now, don’t get me wrong, but first-time offenders should receive a stern warning, perhaps a hefty fine. However, the consequences for such actions should be clear and just – confiscation of ill-gotten gains, and a strong message sent that such behavior will not be tolerated.

However, it seems unfair to dismantle a family and devastate their lives based on a single error, wouldn’t you agree?

Regardless of his anger towards his prison term and expulsion, Giudice expressed that he aims to reverse his deportation decree and rejoin the United States, so he can be nearer to his daughters once more.

Read More

2025-07-06 02:06

Previous post ‘My Lady Jane’ Star Devastated by Prime Video’s Sudden Cancellation
Next post Finally, Marvel Studios Will Make Hulk Cool Again in 2026 Movie – New Photos Tease Savage Return!