After complaining about too much focus on her courtroom catwalk… Antoinette Lattouf does a 360 and BRAGS about the designers who dressed her while asking her followers ‘what is your favourite look?’

Antoinette Lattouf shared her thoughts on her latest courtroom style in a social media update, an unexpected move following her past criticisms about the attention given to her clothing during her case with the ABC.

Last week, I was granted $70,000 in damages following my successful lawsuit for wrongful termination against a public broadcasting entity in the Federal Court. As a dedicated follower and supporter of this industry, it’s both gratifying and affirming to see justice prevail in such situations.

Following her victory, she shared a series of photos on Instagram showcasing the fashionable ensembles she donned during her appearances at the courthouse.

Additionally, she acknowledged the high-end fashion designers who provided her outfits – a move she had earlier criticized the media for emphasizing her choice of attire over other aspects.

Fashion from the court. A big salute to the pioneers who designed, sewed, and made these stylish outfits a reality (all of them tagged), wrote Lattouf.

To keep updated on high-profile scandals, fashion faux pas at premieres, and trending images and videos from the world of entertainment, sign up for our Showbiz Newsletter by DailyMail.

‘You didn’t just dress me — you armoured me. 

By the way, those gossip magazines getting worked up about me showing emotions, caring, wearing designer clothes, and admitting to being complex – that’s just called having depth. You might want to check it out, ladies.

She then asked her followers: ‘P.S. What was your fave look?’

In one of her outfits, Lattouf donned a $1,399 black coat, a creation from the studio of Australian fashion designer Rebecca Vallance. Accompanying this look was a $11,950 Chanel handbag.

She also put on a stylish display in a $990 blue suit jacket and $690 pants set by Farage. 

At her subsequent court hearing, she chose a double-breasted blazer with checks priced at $800 and coordinating pants worth $490 from the brand Farage.

Besides the outfit, Lattouf donned a complete white power set. This included a jacket worth $899 from Rebecca Vallance and pants of the same hue priced at $499. To finish off, she accessorized with a Jimmy Choo cocktail bag costing $2,425.

Or simply:
Lattouf sported a full white power suit – a $899 blazer and $499 pants from Rebecca Vallance, complemented by a $2,425 Jimmy Choo cocktail handbag.

On a different occasion, she exuded elegance in a stylish black gown designed by an Australian fashion designer, priced at approximately $799.

Another time, she was stunning in a high-end Australian designer’s black dress that costs around $799.

Lastly: On another day, she donned a chic black creation from an Australian label, retailing for roughly $799.

As a lifestyle connoisseur, I chose an exquisite $1200 hourglass-shaped white dress from the esteemed designer Lillian Khallouf to grace my wardrobe.

In this case, the original sentence is in third person, and it’s been rephrased in first person to create a more personal connection and make it sound like advice or anecdote from a lifestyle expert.

Regarding the trial, Lattouf had boasted about her wardrobe, but back in February, she had criticized the media for emphasizing her attire instead.

Anticipating that my appearance would undergo scrutiny, critique, and appraisal is inevitable, given that I am a female figure in the limelight.

‘Women who had been down this road before tried to prepare me for what to expect,’ she said.

To set the facts straight, the attire and embellishments I donned were kindly lent, borrowed, or generously given by individuals within the fashion industry (and having four sisters certainly comes in handy!).

I made it clear that all funds raised through GoFundMe are exclusively intended for legal expenses. So far, these donations have covered approximately 25% of the total cost of this court case. Not a penny from these contributions has been used for anything other than legal fees. The suggestion by certain media outlets that something else is being funded with these funds is unfortunate and simply incorrect.

By the way, while we’re talking, let me share an intriguing thought with you: it’s possible to fight for justice and express yourself through your fashion choices at the same time. Isn’t that fascinating?

Daily Mail Australia has contacted Antoinette Lattouf for comment.

In December 2023, the relaxed radio presenter and supporter of Palestine was given a temporary position on ABC Radio Sydney’s Mornings show for a full week.

She was dismissed following her third work assignment due to the posting she shared on Human Rights Watch, which claimed Israel employed starvation as a tactic in their military conflicts, specifically in Gaza.

The ABC removed Lattouf from the air due to her disregard for instructions not to share opinions on Israel or the conflict in Gaza during her five-day stint.

As a committed supporter, I’d like to express that, in my perspective, Justice Darryl Rangiah did not concur with the situation. He perceived that certain pro-Israel advocacy groups orchestrated a strategic pressure campaign directed towards then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose, aiming to remove Lattouf from broadcast.

As an ardent supporter, I can’t help but voice my concern over the unjust dismissal of Lattouf by ABC. It appears they violated the Fair Work Act by terminating her employment due to her political stance against the Israeli military campaign in Gaza.

Judge Rangiah has mandated that the ABC should compensate Mr. Lattouf in the amount of $70,000. Furthermore, there is a possibility that the ABC could face additional financial penalties for violating the law.

Read More

2025-07-03 06:50

Previous post Top gainers and losers
Next post Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Inks Record-Setting $285 Million USD Extension Contract