Movies

Stop Airing Dirty Laundry!

BBG News

The stars of Australia’s The Sunday Project had a lot to say about Prince Harry this weekend. 

As an over-the-moon fan, I couldn’t believe my eyes when I watched The Duke of Sussex unleash a barrage of sharp remarks towards his family during his groundbreaking interview with the BBC on Friday. The panel on the current affairs show was equally taken aback by this unexpected turn of events.

In a heated conversation, Harry stated that he’s been estranged from his father, King Charles, who refuses to engage with him, following the dismissal of his legal challenge regarding his personal security.

In response to watching an interview clip, Rachel Corbett from The Project suggested that it could potentially be beneficial if he would stop discussing the topic with cameras.

‘People are upset he made the comment about his dad having cancer’ chimed in co-star Sarah Harris. 

She commented, “I’m unsure for how long he might have left.” And she continued, “That’s like him spreading private matters.

‘Don’t forget he wrote a book and followed it up with a documentary and a tell-all with Oprah.’

‘There’s another book on the way by the sounds of it’ quipped Sam Taunton. 

Rachel remarked, “It’s fascinating when folks share information with me, and I’ve gathered so much data that I’m not in need of any more insights.

During an awe-inspiring interview, Harry disclosed that he is unsure about his father‘s remaining time, has no plans to return his spouse or children to the UK, and mentioned numerous disputes within his family, some of whom may never pardon him for authoring a book.

Harry similarly expressed deep disappointment following his court defeat regarding security matters, asserting that it was a manipulative scheme by the establishment.

In reply, Buckingham Palace stated that the security concerns surrounding Harry have been thoroughly and carefully reviewed by the courts multiple times, with the same result being reached every time.

In simpler terms, Sir Geoffrey Vos, one of England’s top judges, indicated to the duke today that his concerns about reduced security were not presented as a valid legal case.

And his handling of the situation following Megxit, where Harry chose to step down as a senior royal and leave Britain, was considered both ‘foreseeable’ and ‘logical’.

Over the weekend, Prince Harry expressed his desire for reconciliation with the Royal Family during an interview with the BBC while residing in California. However, at this moment, he feels disconnected from his father.

The prince expressed that he hasn’t been able to converse with someone due to these security matters, and he wasn’t certain about how much longer the King has left on his life span.

He mentioned that he had encountered numerous conflicts with certain members of his family, but now he has chosen to ‘let go of any resentment or anger’ towards them.

On the other hand, though Harry expressed a desire for reconciliation, it’s apparent that King Charles continues to feel frustrated and agitated towards his son.

According to someone familiar with the matter, the King was disappointed and angered on a deeper level because the Duke didn’t follow this fundamental rule.

Additionally, some of his backers have proposed the idea that perhaps his father isn’t concerned about his loved ones, or maybe it’s time for him to intervene.

He’s been quite worried because a significant amount of time, effort, and money have been spent by the Government to uphold their stance.

Today, Harry expressed his dissatisfaction and appeared disappointed when he referred to his court loss as an “old-style power play” orchestrated by the establishment. He believes that the Royal Family exerted influence over the decision to decrease his security provision.

Inquired about if he petitioned his father, the monarch, to interfere in the argument regarding security matters, Prince Harry clarified that he didn’t ask him for intervention – instead, he asked him to move aside and allow the professionals to handle the tasks at hand.

‘The Ravec committee is an expert committee full of professionals plus the royals.’

Every time I return to the UK now, it’s always a must for me to coordinate through the Royal Family’s estate – five years on, and it still feels like a privilege!

‘My representative on the Ravec committee still to this day is the royal household.

I don’t have the freedom to make this choice myself. Instead, I must navigate through the royal family’s administration, trusting that they prioritize my well-being while we discuss and ponder over these matters.

‘So no, I haven’t asked my father to intervene.’

Everything does.

He went on to say: ‘I wouldn’t have gone as far as I have if I didn’t have strong proof supporting the reasons behind the decision. Here we are today, having lost the appeal, while they managed to maintain my unsafe status. This leaves many unanswered questions that a great number of people will likely ponder.’

‘I have all of the truth, I have all of the knowledge now, throughout the legal process.

I learned something shocking during the legal proceedings in 2021 – that there is no law restricting the decisions of the body called Ravec, where the royal family holds power. This was news to me, as I didn’t realize this before the legal process began. When my lawyer asked me if I knew about Ravec during the initial disclosure, I was taken aback.

In a shocking revelation, Harry also said he would not bring his family to the UK.  

He clarified: At present, I don’t foresee a scenario where I would return my wife and kids to the United Kingdom with me. They will miss out on many things in that case.

I hold a deep affection for my native land, which has remained constant over time. Regardless of certain actions taken by some individuals in that country, I find myself yearning for the UK. There are specific areas within the UK that I long to revisit. Of course, it’s only natural. It saddens me that my children and I may not be able to experience the beauty and richness of my homeland together.

Today, it was sensationally revealed that Harry has lost his fight for taxpayer-funded personal security in the form of armed police officers in the UK, meaning he will have to cover a £1.5 million expense.

Prince Harry was informed that his concerns about reduced security didn’t provide a strong enough legal basis to effectively contest the decision.

For over five years now, Harry feels he’s been subjected to unfair and harsh treatment, receiving less favorable treatment than warranted, ever since the events following Megxit.

His lawyer asserted that the discontinuation of Metropolitan Police armed guards while he’s in the United Kingdom has placed the royal’s life in jeopardy.

In simple terms, a noble residing in California was battling the rejection of his lawsuit against the UK’s Home Office regarding the Ravec committee’s decision to provide him with a different level of security while in the UK.

In a statement made today in London, Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos explained that Ravec’s actions were a reasonable and foreseeable response to the claimant withdrawing from royal obligations and residing mainly outside the UK.

He stated, “These arguments were both compelling and emotional, and it seemed evident that the Duke of Sussex had been unfairly handled by the institution.

After careful examination, it appeared to me that the Duke’s feelings of being wronged didn’t provide a valid basis for contesting RAVEC’s ruling.

In his own words, Sir Geoffrey pointed out that Harry tends to blur the lines by drawing hasty comparisons between himself and high-profile individuals, yet these likenesses have failed to shed any light on the core issue at hand.

He added: ‘My conclusion was that the Duke of Sussex’s appeal would be dismissed’.

Currently, it’s not guaranteed that police protection, funded by British taxpayers, will immediately be restored for Meghan, Archie, and Lilibet during their visits to the UK. This development brings up speculation about potential future trips the Sussex family might make to Britain.

As a lifestyle expert, I find myself in a unique position to discuss recent developments involving the royal family. It appears that there’s a disagreement brewing between the monarch and his youngest heir regarding Harry’s legal battle with the Home Office. The Home Secretary has publicly urged Prince Harry to bear the brunt of the costs associated with this case, which could potentially amount to around AUD $3,099,700. This is quite a substantial sum, I must say!

Read More

2025-05-04 17:49

Previous post Wrexham Worth Millions More Thanks To Ryan Reynolds
Next post White Lotus Stars Aimee Lou Wood & Walton Goggins Reignite Friendship After Instagram Drama