Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings Is Finding an Audience in 2026

by

Ridley Scott is widely considered one of the most talented filmmakers ever. He’s known for directing iconic movies like Alien (1979), Blade Runner (1982), Gladiator (2000), Hannibal (2001), and more recently, House of Gucci (2021), The Last Duel (2021), and Napoleon (2023). Though he has an extensive filmography, certain projects truly define his remarkable career.

Ridley Scott’s 2014 film, Exodus: Gods and Kings, is widely considered one of his weakest efforts. It received poor reviews, with only a 29% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and audiences weren’t much more enthusiastic. However, after over a decade since its release, some viewers are revisiting the biblical story of the Exodus and giving the film another look.

Exodus: Gods and Kings is a Confusing Mix of Brilliant Acting & Bad Writing

As a film critic, I recently saw Exodus: Gods and Kings, and it’s a sweeping, epic retelling of the classic story of Moses leading the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt – you know, the Exodus. It’s based on the second book of the Bible, and honestly, it’s a tale that’s been brought to life on screen many times before. What sets this version apart is how powerfully, and beautifully, it manages to tell this well-known story.

The film earned $268.2 million in theaters, but it consistently came in second place due to competition from another movie. While audiences worldwide showed interest in Exodus: Gods and Kings, it received poor reviews from both viewers and critics. Today, it’s largely considered one of Ridley Scott’s weakest films and is mostly remembered for being a disappointment.

According to Rotten Tomatoes, Exodus: Gods and Kings is an ambitious but uneven film that doesn’t quite measure up to the original story. Some critics, like Alonso Duralde of The Wrap, drew comparisons to the 1956 film The Ten Commandments, pointing out that director Ridley Scott doesn’t offer a fresh take on this well-known biblical tale. The movie focuses more on spectacle than on innovative storytelling, meaning it’s unlikely to surprise viewers.

A particularly critical review comes from Pete Hammond at Deadline Hollywood, who questioned whether Ridley Scott’s latest film, despite its impressive visuals and his skill at depicting disaster, offers a story compelling enough to attract large audiences and justify its significant production costs.

Hammond raises a good point about whether the high production costs of this large-scale film were justified by its earnings. While the film grossed almost $270 million, the estimated budget of $140–200 million doesn’t leave a significant profit margin. Essentially, even with impressive visuals, retelling a well-known story wasn’t compelling enough to attract huge audiences and generate substantial returns.

If Exodus: Gods and Kings had been made for under $100 million, the conversation would be very different. However, given its high production cost and relatively low box office earnings, the film’s performance speaks for itself. While critics pointed to issues with the film’s pacing and shallow characters, its biggest problem is a lack of originality. It retreads familiar ground without offering a fresh perspective, ultimately feeling like a repetitive and uninspired retelling of a well-known story – a waste of the audience’s time.

As Exodus: Gods and Kings Finds New Life on Tubi, Some Fans are Re-evaluating the Film’s Negative Rep

When Exodus: Gods and Kings was first released, opinions were really divided. Some critics strongly disliked it, while others enjoyed it. What everyone agreed on at the time was how visually impressive it was – the sets, special effects, and overall production quality were top-notch. The film still looks spectacular today, more than twelve years later, and truly captures the scale and grandeur you’d expect from a biblical story.

Despite the script’s weaknesses – particularly its underdeveloped characters – many critics and fans were highly impressed with the performances of Joel Edgerton, John Turturro, and Sigourney Weaver. The actors received widespread praise for making the most of a challenging script and delivering strong performances.

With over a decade since its release, people are revisiting Exodus: Gods and Kings and appreciating it in a new light. The film’s impressive visual effects are still stunning, particularly now when large-scale historical and biblical dramas are less common. Plus, the movie boasts a strong cast, including well-known actors like Christian Bale.

It’s been a long time since Hollywood tackled the story of Moses and the Exodus, and revisiting it now feels surprisingly new. While Exodus: Gods and Kings still has flaws – the story feels rushed and the characters aren’t particularly well-developed – its biggest problem might have been bad timing. Seen today, it doesn’t seem nearly as disappointing as critics originally claimed.

In a review for Variety, Justin Chang described Exodus: Gods and Kings as visually stunning and immersive, even if it deviates from the original story to fit the blockbuster mold. He praised the film for letting its powerful imagery speak for itself, which is a refreshing change from many faith-based movies that explicitly tell viewers what to believe.

I recently revisited a review from 2014, and it really hit home why I still love Exodus: Gods and Kings. It’s just a stunning, epic film that truly transports you to Ancient Egypt. What struck me most, as the reviewer pointed out, is how the movie shows you the weight of the story instead of trying to preach or tell you how to feel. That approach still works incredibly well, and it makes me think this movie deserves another look.

5 Questions
Test Your Take on Ridley Scott’s Biblical Epic Flop-or-Forgotten Gem?
Your Top Score
—
Attempts
—
0
0
Report Error

Found an error? Send it so it can be corrected.

Read More

2026-04-09 21:27