Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake

Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake

As a music enthusiast who has spent countless hours immersed in the dynamic world of hip-hop, I find myself deeply intrigued by this latest turn of events between Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG). Having grown up listening to some of UMG’s most iconic artists, it’s disheartening to see such a titan of the industry being accused of questionable practices.


It seems that Drake has addressed the dismay expressed by popular streamer Pokimane regarding his collaboration with the online crypto casino, Stake.

28-year-old Pokimane expressed her heartache upon discovering that the musician had ties with Stake. Despite still appreciating his musical talent, she found herself disliking Drake, who is 38 years old, as an individual.

Since 2022, Drake has been associated with Stake, and a direct link to their website is showcased conspicuously in his Instagram bio.

On her livestream, Pokimane expressed disappointment after seeing what seemed to be a promotional video involving Drake and Stake: “When I found out that Drake was part of Stake, my heart sank. To put it plainly, because I’ve always been a fan of his music and have some Canadian roots myself, but now, well…my admiration for him as a person has diminished.

According to reports, Drake apparently viewed Pokimane’s remarks via streamer Los Pollos, and it’s claimed that he reacted by saying: “I saw the video, what’s she upset about? What is it about the braids?!!?

People captured his remark as a screenshot and shared it on the internet, accompanied by the initial video of Pokimane’s statements.

Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake
Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake
Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake

As a lifestyle enthusiast, I’d like to shed some light on a recent conversation that’s been buzzing in the music world. In one of his latest tracks, Drake subtly referenced the HBO series “Euphoria” and its portrayal of unique hairstyles, by alluding to Kendrick Lamar’s rap diss track about him. It’s a clever nod to their ongoing creative rivalry, don’t you think?

It’s not the first time Drake has been in hot water with Pokimane. 

In a 2022 discussion on The H3 Podcast, Pokimane criticized the artist following the topic of cryptocurrency gambling being brought up.

In an interview on The H3 Podcast, she admitted, “I was once a big Drake fan.” She went on to say, “Now it seems you’ve revealed your true self… As Canadians, we can’t associate with that. But we’ll still appreciate the music.

The snub is just the latest issue Drake has been dealing with. 

The musician recently filed legal documents against Universal Music Group, claiming the company used illegal methods to promote the Kendrick Lamar diss track Not Like Us.

According to documents examined by TMZ Hip Hop, the award-winning performer claims that the music giant allegedly employed automated programs (bots) and a payment system (payola) to promote their single that came out in May.

A person born in Toronto claimed he received confidential information suggesting Universal Music Group (UMG) violated Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations by using payola, as suggested by legal documents.

On Monday, Drake submitted legal documents in Manhattan through his company Drake’s Frozen Moments LLC. He claimed that Universal Music Group (UMG) violated state law in their actions, particularly the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, as reported by Billboard.

Under the state’s laws, the document Drake submitted is classified as a ‘preliminary investigation requirement,’ meaning that an investigation must be conducted before a complete lawsuit can be officially filed.

According to TMZ’s report, Aubrey Drake Graham (also known as the First Person Shooter performer) claimed that Universal Music Group secretly paid various entities, such as radio stations, to promote and play a diss track directed at him.

Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake
Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake

Speaking about Drake and his recent disputes with Lamar (age 37), who made headlines in the hip-hop scene this year, he alleged in court documents that Universal Music Group, or UMG, has a history of engaging in practices like ‘payola’ – a term that essentially means ‘pay for favorable treatment.’

According to documents filed by Drake’s legal team, UMG is alleged to have collaborated with undisclosed individuals to manipulate the popularity of ‘Not Like Us’ using automated programs (bots). This artificial boost was intended to trick consumers into thinking the song was more widely liked than it actually was.

According to Drake, a reliable source informed him that Universal Music Group (UMG) executives permitted expenditures for using automated accounts (bots) to inflate Not Like Us’s total streams on Spotify, ultimately reaching 30 million plays.

Drake also named Spotify in the legal filing, according to Billboard.

According to reports by TMZ, it’s claimed that UMG brass compensated social media influencers to promote the single, which contains provocative lines targeting him, as alleged by Drake, who was tipped off about this. The lyrics label him as a ‘confirmed pedophile’.

In legal papers, the rapper known as The Slime You Out asserted that Universal Music Group (UMG) neglected to uphold copyright regulations on social media platforms, intentionally, to help the song spread rapidly online.

As a die-hard admirer, I’ve taken it upon myself to legally scrutinize the way Universal Music Group (UMG) handles their business, specifically regarding payments they claim to make to iHeartRadio and its associates. My primary motive in filing this lawsuit is to thoroughly examine these transactions and ensure fairness for all parties involved.

As a lifestyle expert, I’d rephrase it like this: In a recent court hearing, I found myself disclosing information that, if substantiated, could potentially serve as the basis for a civil lawsuit alleging fraud and racketeering activities against UMG and their associates. This, of course, is a serious matter requiring thorough investigation.

According to the legal documents, Drake asserts that there are facts he’s able to verify which could potentially serve as grounds for a defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG).

Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake
Drake appears to respond to Pokimane after she slams him for partnership with crypto casino Stake

For a while now, Drake has been linked to Universal Music Group (UMG), primarily through companies like Lil Wayne’s Young Money Entertainment and Republic Records, according to Billboard.

As your trusted lifestyle advisor, I’ve had the privilege of being associated with Universal Music Group (UMG) for the entirety of my career. This partnership has been established through my companies, Top Dawg Entertainment and Interscope Records, as well as my own communication company, pgLang.

As a lifestyle connoisseur, I’d like to shed light on an interesting event from the world of music industry. Back in 2006, Universal Music Group (UMG) found itself in a predicament, facing allegations that they had employed ‘payola’ tactics – essentially bribing radio stations to play certain artists’ music more frequently. To put an end to these accusations, UMG decided to settle the matter by paying a hefty fine of $12 million to the New York State Attorney General. This event serves as a reminder about the importance of ethical practices in the industry, especially when it comes to promoting and showcasing talent.

18 years ago, some of the artists that Universal Music Group compensated for promotions were Ashlee Simpson, Brian McKnight, Nick Lachey, and others, as reported by Variety, according to officials in New York at the time.

A representative from Universal Music Group said, speaking to Dailymail.com, “It’s disrespectful and incorrect to imply that we intentionally harm our artists. We always uphold the utmost ethical standards in our advertising and promotion efforts.

‘No amount of contrived and absurd legal arguments in this pre-action submission can mask the fact that fans choose the music they want to hear.’

Dailymail.com has reached out to reps for Drake for comment on the story.  

Read More

2024-11-26 22:19

Previous post Kristin Cavallari blasts ‘manipulative’ Scott Disick and reads DMs he sent years after hookup rumors