Formula 1: Europe schedule shift could backfire in a critical way

Formula 1: Europe schedule shift could backfire in a critical way

As a lifelong Formula 1 enthusiast with memories of cheering for my favorite drivers at iconic tracks like Monaco and Spa-Francorchamps etched into my heart, I find myself grappling with the prospect of some races becoming biannual events. The charm of Formula 1 lies not just in the high-speed thrills on the track, but in the camaraderie and shared passion of fans across the globe.


As a gaming enthusiast, I’m constantly vying for a spot on the roster among numerous potential contenders when it comes to securing a slot in the grand racing tournament. The competition is fierce because there are more eligible venues than available spots on the calendar.

Approximately half of this season’s 24 events take place in Europe, and as there is growing enthusiasm from locations in South America, Africa, and parts of Europe not currently represented, some races might occur only every other year rather than annually in the future.

Over recent years, many conventional racing tracks have given way to urban street circuits. However, Formula 1 appears reluctant to let some classic road courses disappear entirely, largely because of their rich heritage.

Stefano Domenicali, CEO of Formula 1, expressed his intense focus on maximizing financial gains, fostering market expansion, and ensuring overall business success. In striving for these goals, Formula 1 intends to handle the situation thoughtfully while preserving its prestigious status as the pinnacle in motor racing.

But there is much risk involved with such a schedule shift.

As Formula 1 seeks to expand both the sport and its commercial endeavors, it’s crucial to pay closer attention to the venues and spectators. Each Grand Prix event throughout the season draws over 100,000 fans during race weekends. Changing some races from annual events to biannual ones could potentially stir up a significant response.

1) The enthusiasm of Formula 1 fans contributes greatly to what makes the sport unique. After each race, all 20 drivers on the grid express gratitude towards their supporters. A large number of fans choose to attend their home races annually, and making some Grands Prix only semi-annual could be detrimental to these fans, potentially causing a substantial loss in revenue for Formula 1 and the hosting tracks as well.

Some facilities find it challenging to host a race every two years due to the necessity of financial support from sponsors and other revenue sources that contribute significantly to their survival. Moreover, certain venues prefer not to overlap their schedules, as demonstrated by Circuit Zandvoort’s decision to decline the offer to share its slot with Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya.

If Domenicali and Formula 1 consider changing their methods, merely swapping race locations isn’t the best solution. A more effective approach would be to evaluate the overall performance of each race, considering various aspects, when planning the schedule for the next season.

Each Grand Prix venue from this season is expected to submit their data to Formula 1. This information will be utilized to design the 2026 calendar. If a race consistently performs poorly, it will be replaced with another event. This setup encourages all Grands Prix to strive for excellence and innovation, fostering growth in every aspect.

Read More

2024-11-15 14:32

Previous post Shoegaze rocker Wisp is Gen Z’s ambassador for the opaque and brutal—even at rap festivals