
As a seasoned movie critic with decades of experience in the entertainment industry, I have witnessed the evolution of technology and its impact on art forms, including music. The recent legal actions taken by major record labels against AI companies Suno and Udio for alleged copyright infringement is a topic that piques my interest.
Two AI companies are being sued by leading record labels for accused infringement on their copyrighted music recordings, using them as source material to produce new tunes.
Major record companies, including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group, have taken legal action against Suno and Udio for alleged copyright violations, according to the Recording Industry Association of America’s announcement on Monday.
Two tech firms are accused of using protected music from a wide range of artists, genres, and eras without permission to educate their AI systems in generating new content.
“In the music world today, we’re working hand in hand with trustworthy AI developers to create innovative tools that prioritize human creativity. These instruments empower artists and songwriters to take the reins.”
I strongly believe that collaboration is key to achieving success in any project, especially when it comes to developing innovative AI technology. However, I’ve seen firsthand how unlicensed services like Suno and Udio undermine this principle by copying artists’ life works without their consent or compensation. This not only goes against ethical business practices but also sets back the progress of genuinely innovative AI for all of us.
Mikey Shulman, CEO of Suno, shared with The Times that the company’s objective is to enable music creation for all.
He explained that our technology goes beyond the conventional; it produces fresh results instead of just repeating what was learned before.
Based on my personal experience working in the tech industry and dealing with corporate legal teams, I strongly believe that rigid adherence to rules without open communication can lead to unnecessary conflicts. In my past encounters with record labels, I have noticed a pattern where they resort to legal action instead of engaging in productive discussions.
On its website, Udio expressed their commitment to their technology and predicted that generative AI will be an essential part of our contemporary culture in the future.
In my perspective, I’m captivated by the capability of generative AI models, including our musical one. Much like how I, as a learner, absorb information by listening to melodies and analyzing sheet music, this model has been exposed to an extensive library of recorded tunes. It has “heard” and absorbed from these musical pieces to develop its skills.
“During model training, our aim is to gain insight into musical concepts – the fundamental elements of music creation that belong to nobody. We have no intention of replicating the specific content from our training data.”
In my perspective as a movie reviewer, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) made some shocking revelations about Suno and Udio. According to them, Suno was “caught on tape, memorizing and repeating artists’ recordings verbatim.” Regarding Udio, the RIAA saw their statement as a “startling confession,” implying that they had been engaging in illegal and unethical practices.
In Massachusetts, a lawsuit was initiated against Suno, whereas a complaint was submitted against Udio in New York.
I followed the news about the copyrighted tracks reportedly extracted by AI programs. Among those mentioned were Mariah Carey’s “All I Want for Christmas Is You,” Jerry Lee Lewis’ “Great Balls of Fire,” the Beach Boys’ “I Get Around,” ABBA’s “Dancing Queen,” James Brown’s “I Got You (I Feel Good),” Michael Bublé’s “Sway,” Green Day’s “American Idiot,” the Temptations’ “My Girl,” and Michael Jackson’s “Billie Jean.”
Suno and Udio, the musicians, are being pressured by record labels to acknowledge unauthorized use of their music archives and request the courts to prevent AI firms from taking their copyrighted content in the future. Additionally, the plaintiffs aim to receive compensation for any copyright violations that have occurred.
About a month after sending warnings to 700 artificial intelligence creators, Sony Music found itself involved in lawsuits. The New York-based music corporation expressed its support for artists and songwriters using new technologies to enhance their art in a statement. However, they also pledged to guard their intellectual property against unauthorized usage by AI developers.
Some musicians are now using AI as a helpful resource. In May, the indie pop artist Washed Out unveiled an AI-generated music video for his song “The Hardest Part.” This Georgia-based musician, whose true name is Ernest Greene, created the video by utilizing OpenAI’s Sora technology that converts text into videos.
Read More
- Clash Royale Best Boss Bandit Champion decks
- Mobile Legends November 2025 Leaks: Upcoming new heroes, skins, events and more
- The John Wick spinoff ‘Ballerina’ slays with style, but its dialogue has two left feet
- Delta Force Best Settings and Sensitivity Guide
- Stocks stay snoozy as Moody’s drops U.S. credit—guess we’re all just waiting for the crash
- Bentley Delivers Largest Fleet of Bespoke Flying Spurs to Galaxy Macau
- Steve McQueen on making WWII personal with ‘Blitz’: ‘It’s about us fighting ourselves’
- ‘Australia’s Most Sexually Active Woman’ Annie Knight reveals her shock plans for the future – after being hospitalised for sleeping with 583 men in a single day
- Kingdom Rush Battles Tower Tier List
- Clash of Clans: How to beat the Fully Staffed Challenge
2024-07-18 22:04