28 Years Later: The Shocking Truth Behind the Franchise’s Deeper Meaning!

In the movie titled “28 Years Later“, it’s not just zombies that are changing, but rather the “infected” beings. Although this might appear to be a minor alteration in terminology, director Danny Boyle considers it significant. He is back to direct the eagerly awaited third installment of the post-apocalyptic horror series, which originated from his groundbreaking outbreak thriller “28 Days Later“, almost 25 years later.

He explains, “Our concept was that they aren’t actually zombies, they’re just infected individuals. We aimed to portray them differently physically, yet we wanted to emphasize that they aren’t undead either. They can die, as can anyone else, but they pose a threat that could lead to your demise if you come into contact with them.

28 Days Later, despite not strictly adhering to traditional zombie terminology, still managed to become a massive success story in the zombie genre. Released in the U.K. in November 2002, followed by a release in the United States in June of the following year, this groundbreaking collaboration between director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland quickly spread like a contagion. It grossed over $80 million worldwide on a reported budget of just $8 million. Following their previous work together in 2000’s The Beach, this was Boyle’s second film based on a novel or screenplay by Garland. In 28 Days Later, Cillian Murphy portrays bike courier Jim, who wakes up from a coma in an empty London hospital to discover that a virus known as the Rage Virus has ravaged the U.K. This virus, the result of flawed human experimentation on chimps, has left swarms of incredibly fast, uncontrollable, aggressive, and bloodthirsty infected behind.

Twenty-eight years after its initial release, the film titled “28 Years Later” infuses fresh vigor into the franchise’s infectious metaphor, set in a world that is still grappling with the aftermath of a prolonged global contagion. Despite the original movie’s success being partly due to its innovative spin on a genre, its allure was never solely about the excitement and fear it offered. At its core, the narrative serves as a thought-provoking political parable, warning us about how society can descend into violence when people are abandoned by their institutions.

In my humble opinion as a film critic, “28 Days Later” revolutionized the concept of zombies for today’s audience by reinventing the rules about how these undead creatures could move. Unlike the slow, lumbering monsters from George A. Romero’s 1968 masterpiece, “The Night of the Living Dead“, these new beasts were swift and relentless, making them truly terrifying. As Danny Boyle puts it, “It made perfect sense that they would be much more frightening if they could move at breakneck speed.” At the time, this change was quite daring and innovative.

In July 2001, Boyle filmed scenes for the movie “28 Days” depicting a deserted London. This was less than a month before the 9/11 attacks, and Boyle notes that the circumstances surrounding its release significantly altered the film’s essence. He explains, “It was the first movie to be released post-9/11 that focused on citywide terror, emphasizing the notion that these seemingly indestructible cities could be transformed in an instant. They could lose their purpose – the people – rendering them senseless. That’s one reason we were hesitant to use the term ‘zombie,’ as it would limit our ability to create a unique identity.

Over the past ten years or so, there was a significant surge in the production of media focused on zombies. This boom was fueled by the increased fascination of the public with horror subgenres. During this time, many notable horror films were released such as 2004’s “Dawn of the Dead,” 2007’s “28 Weeks Later,” and 2013’s “World War Z.” Additionally, beloved parody films like “Shaun of the Dead” from 2004 and “Zombieland” from 2009 were produced. Furthermore, this trend extended to other media formats, as evidenced by the 11-season run of the TV series “The Walking Dead” and video games like “Call of Duty: Black Ops” and “The Last of Us,” which also adopted the infected theme.

28 Years Later, hitting theaters June 20, director Danny Boyle revisits the site of the initial Rage Virus outbreak after a span of nearly three decades. The upcoming film focuses on 12-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) who ventures out from the secluded Holy Island community, an area linked to the British mainland only by a tidal causeway, to discover the world beyond his sole known home. Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Jodie Comer portray Spike’s parents, Jamie and Isla, while Ralph Fiennes takes on the role of Dr. Kelson, a survivalist Spike encounters during his journey. The story reveals that the infection was ultimately contained within the U.K., as it was isolated and allowed to run its course while the rest of the world continued to progress.

Boyle expressed a desire to create a storyline where the focus was on their own country, rather than allowing the virus to spread globally as hinted at in “28 Weeks Later.” To achieve this, they decided to set the film within the U.K., with all characters being British and dealing with the issues independently without external intervention.

The story draws some influence from Brexit, the U.K.’s departure from the European Union in 2020, which Boyle likens to the country moving in reverse. However, the film’s exploration of how society might reconstruct itself following a catastrophic event was also significantly shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Initially, during the COVID outbreak, we used gloves and sanitized our groceries, according to him. However, as time passed, one tends to become less cautious and take more chances. You don’t remain in a hyper-vigilant state forever. Instead, you adapt. This is similar to what happens in “28 Years“. Initially, they are careful, but over time, they start taking risks. Jamie even takes his 12-year-old son to the mainland, which the mom considers reckless.

The ghost of COVID-19 influenced the way the film portrayed its characters honoring those who perished from the Rage Virus, with a particularly moving tribute represented by an impressive physical memorial within the movie. As Boyle explains, “This act serves as a testament to humanity, reminding us that even though they are no longer here, we remember and respect them.

It’s reasonable for Isla to worry about Spike leaving home given the ongoing presence of infected individuals. The virus has transformed into a supercharged strain, referred to as Alphas, due to its steroid-like effects on certain carriers. According to Boyle, “The virus is adaptable, which means it continues to evolve.” He explains that because the virus requires so much energy from its hosts, it’s found new hosts capable of hunting to sustain it. When you hunt in a group, organization naturally follows, and as a result, these Alphas have started leading pack hunts.

The instinctual traits reminiscent of the original characters crafted by Garland and Boyle serve as a basis for a chilling antagonist. Unlike mindless zombies shambling for brains, these pose a far greater menace to Spike and his fellow inhabitants.

Despite seemingly arriving late in the wave of zombie movie popularity, the enthusiasm for “28 Years Later” remains robust. In fact, the first official trailer released in December garnered the second highest number of views within 24 hours among all horror movie trailers ever, trailing only the trailer for “It Chapter Two” (2019). Furthermore, with impressive ticket presales, it’s projected to have a record-breaking opening weekend of approximately $34 million at the domestic box office, making it the strongest start yet for this franchise.

The strength of its attraction lies in the fact that since the release of “28 Days Later” 23 years ago, Danny Boyle hasn’t produced a film even slightly resembling a zombie movie. After his dramedy “Millions,” which was a follow-up to “28 Days,” Boyle went on to direct notable award contenders such as “Slumdog Millionaire” (which won the Oscar for Best Picture in 2008), “127 Hours” in 2010, and “Steve Jobs” in 2015. Some might argue that Boyle’s filmography lacks a common theme. However, the filmmaker claims he was convinced differently.

He expressed that each movie he directed was distinct in his mind, but then he encountered a French journalist who pointed out, “All your films bear striking similarities. They usually feature a central character, who is often male, and they revolve around the protagonist facing seemingly impossible obstacles before triumphing over them.” And to some extent, that assessment holds water.

In this case, the struggle to surmount those challenges will span across three movies, starting with “28 Years Later“. Recognizing that fans had been eagerly awaiting a sequel for quite some time, directors Boyle and Garland chose to unfold the remainder of the tale as a trilogy. According to Boyle, “the concept evolved of three films that stand independently yet are interconnected.” There’s a consistent character development woven throughout the series.

As Garland works on all three scripts simultaneously, it was decided that Nia DaCosta (known for “Candyman” and “The Marvels”) would direct the second installment titled “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple”. This choice, according to Boyle, was made to disrupt the predominance of male directors, often referred to as a ‘boys club’. “The Bone Temple” was filmed alongside its predecessor and is scheduled for release in cinemas in January 2026. After that, Boyle will take over directing duties again for the third film, which he suggests will delve deeper into themes of redemption, focusing on Murphy’s character Jim, thereby concluding the series.

After three films in the series, with two more left, does director Boyle care about how his horror masterpiece is categorized? “Feel free to label it as you wish,” he states. “All I ask is that you find it entertaining and believe it belongs among the greats.

Read More

2025-06-16 21:06